The article describes the work of Stanford researchers, led by H.-S. Philip Wong, in testing the capabilities of two different types of alternative memory to flash, namely resistive random-access memory (RRAM) and phase-change memory (PCM). I myself have covered in this blog Eric Pop's research into PCM.
But in the recent past, those alternative memories that have taken on flash, such as IBM's much ballyhooed Millipede Project, have suffered ignominious ends.We are told, however, that flash memory cannot rule the roost forever because of density limits. So alternatives must be found. With the pressure on, up step RRAM and PCM. And in the article we learn that some companies are planning to introduce PCM and RRAM memories in the near future. With commercial introduction possible so soon, Wong thought it might be worthwhile to see how far the technology can scale. So they went right to the limit, using 1.2-nanometer-wide nanotubes as electrodes. Ultimately, Wong and his team were able to produce an RRAM cell measuring 6 by 6 nm that was fully operational. Since the memory cell switches with less than 10 microamperes of current and about 10 volts, which meets expectations derived from previous experiments, it serves as a sign that RRAM will scale well, according to Wong. But while I was reading this I couldn’t help but think about the paper recently presented by Professor Mike Kelly at Cambridge University that claims that structures with dimensions of 3 nm or less cannot be mass-produced. Now, drawing a line in the sand of technological progress is a risky—and rarely rewarding—exercise. But Kelly would seem to have presented some pretty plausible reasons for why he drew that line. I wonder how seriously the companies that are nearing the introduction of some kind of PCM or RRAM products in the coming years are considering this theoretical threshold. Maybe a 3-nm test should be instituted.