The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

According to various news reports like this one in the New York Times, initial National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) analysis of data from 58 crashes involving Toyota vehicles indicate that driver error rather than sudden unintended acceleration (SUA) caused by faulty electronics were to blame.

The findings were part of NHTSA's interim report into its investigation into SUA in Toyota vehicles.

Upon release of the findings, Toyota immediately said in a press release:

"Toyota's own vehicle evaluations have confirmed that the remedies it developed for sticking accelerator pedal and potential accelerator pedal entrapment by an unsecured or incompatible floor mat are effective. We have also confirmed several different causes for unintended acceleration reports, including pedal entrapment by floor mats, pedal misapplication and vehicle functions where a slight increase in engine speed is normal, such as engine idle up from a cold start or air conditioning loads."

"Having conducted more than 4,000 on-site vehicle inspections, in no case have we found electronic throttle controls to be a cause of unintended acceleration. Toyota is committed to listening more attentively to our customers and continuing to investigate unintended acceleration concerns."

Toyota's press release basically reiterated what it said last month.

Last week, says this story in USAToday, Steve St. Angelo, Toyota’s chief quality officer in North America, pressed the company's case further when he told the audience at a seminar hosted by the Center for Automotive Research that:

"Look, we're engineers; we're scientists. We thrive on finding something wrong. I am 100% confident that there is nothing wrong with our electronic throttle control systems."

The New York Times stated that NHTSA reported that while it had received over 3,000 complaints involving sudden unintended acceleration, its investigators could only find fifty-eight crashes to study. The event data recorders in the vehicles indicated that in thirty-eight of the vehicles, the brakes were not applied before the crash. The Times story says this suggested "the possibility that the drivers had mistakenly floored the gas pedal instead of the brake."

In fourteen crashes, the brakes were applied, but in nine of those cases, the brakes were applied late. In one crash, both the brake and the gas pedal were applied. In the remaining seven cases, no useful data could be found.

Furthermore, the Times story notes, "... the government investigators, by examining the vehicles and interviewing the drivers in addition to downloading data, found one instance of the accelerator pedal’s becoming stuck under the floor mat, and no cases of a sticky pedal."

Critics pointed the NHTSA findings shouldn't be viewed as the final answer to the question of SUA in Toyota vehicles, since the event data recorders aren't designed to provide information indicating sudden unintended acceleration in non-crash situations, and the NHTSA data may be biased.

NHTSA itself said to be careful about interpreting the initial findings. This LA Timesarticle says that:

 "Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration head David Strickland told three members of Congress in the briefing that the agencies had drawn 'no conclusion' on the causes of sudden acceleration and noted that investigations by NHTSA, NASA, and the National Academy of Sciences were ongoing, with final results a year or more away."

And one can expect the court cases against Toyota in regard to SUA to drag on much longer than that.

The Conversation (0)

We Need More Than Just Electric Vehicles

To decarbonize road transport we need to complement EVs with bikes, rail, city planning, and alternative energy

11 min read
A worker works on the frame of a car on an assembly line.

China has more EVs than any other country—but it also gets most of its electricity from coal.

VCG/Getty Images

EVs have finally come of age. The total cost of purchasing and driving one—the cost of ownership—has fallen nearly to parity with a typical gasoline-fueled car. Scientists and engineers have extended the range of EVs by cramming ever more energy into their batteries, and vehicle-charging networks have expanded in many countries. In the United States, for example, there are more than 49,000 public charging stations, and it is now possible to drive an EV from New York to California using public charging networks.

With all this, consumers and policymakers alike are hopeful that society will soon greatly reduce its carbon emissions by replacing today’s cars with electric vehicles. Indeed, adopting electric vehicles will go a long way in helping to improve environmental outcomes. But EVs come with important weaknesses, and so people shouldn’t count on them alone to do the job, even for the transportation sector.

Keep Reading ↓Show less