Green Data: The Next Step to Zero-Emissions Data Centers

If the IT industry can halve its carbon emissions in each of the next three decades, it can help the planet reach net zero by 2050

4 min read
Image of the solar panels at a solar farm in Arizona.
Apple's 50-megawatt solar farm in Arizona provides renewable energy to its data center in Mesa, Ariz.
Photo: Apple

Data centers consume just two to three percent of the planet’s total electricity usage. So reducing data centers’ climate footprint may not seem, at first blush, to be a high priority as world leaders gather in New York next week to consider practical climate change solutions at the U.N. Climate Action Summit.

However, there are at least two reasons why data centers will likely play a key role in any attempt to curb global emissions. First, as cloud computing becomes more energy efficient and increasingly relies on renewable sources, other sectors such as manufacturing, transportation, and buildings could turn to green data centers to reduce their own emissions. For example, a car manufacturer might outsource all of its in-house computing to zero-emission data centers.

Even without such partnerships, though, data centers will likely play an important part in the climate’s future. The rise of AI, machine learning, big data, and the Internet of Things means that data centers’ global electricity consumption will continue to increase. By one estimate, consumption could jump to as much as 13 percent of the world’s total electricity demand by 2030.

For these reasons, says Johan Falk, senior innovation fellow at the Stockholm Resilience Center in Sweden, data centers will have outsized importance in climate change mitigation efforts. And the more progress society makes in the near term, the sooner the benefits will begin to multiply.

Falk is initiator and coauthor of an omnibus 2018 report called the Exponential Climate Action Roadmap, which lays out a plan for what further actions are needed to reach net zero emissions by 2050. That goal was recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to restrict warming to no more than 1.5 degrees C above preindustrial levels (the planet has already warmed by about 1 degree C).

As Falk describes the report: “We translate something really complicated from science in terms of trajectories and IPCC curves to an easy rule of thumb—halving emissions every decade.”

Simply put, the road map presents a plan to halve global emissions during the 2020s, halve them again in the 2030s, and halve them once more into the 2040s. Three halvings, Falk says, can effectively get the planet to zero emissions by the IPCC’s 2050 deadline.

The road map sees the shift toward renewable-powered data centers as a necessary step to halve emissions from the digital and IT industry. Indeed, the authors find, switching to renewables alone (for powering data centers as well as networks, devices, and IT manufacturing) gets the industry through its first emissions halving.

Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and Apple have led the way in running data centers on renewable power. In the past two years, both Google and Apple have achieved 100 percent renewable-powered operations. Facebook has said it will hit 100 percent by next year, and Microsoft plans to run 60 percent of its data centers with renewable power by next year.

Amazon, by contrast, has lagged behind. Greenpeace criticized Amazon earlier this year for using only 12 percent renewable energy in its Virginia data centers—after the company had laid out an ambitious road map for reaching 100 percent.

Meanwhile, a separate coalition in Sweden has approached green data centers as a problem of standards. Fossil Free Data is a new label that its creators hope can represent a climate seal of approval (like the Energy Star certification) for consumers, governments, and businesses.

“The idea behind Fossil Free Data is really to get those companies who are doing this in a sustainable way to also be able to show that they are—to be proud of what they do and brag about it,” says Christoffer Svanberg, chief communication officer at Node Pole in Kyrkgränd, Sweden (one of the sponsors of the Fossil Free Data organization).

Fossil Free Data launched earlier this year and is currently developing its standard for Nordic countries and Northern Europe. The group expects to expand to the E.U. and ultimately to certify U.S. data centers as well. “I would argue that the everyday [consumer]’s notion about this is obviously very low,” Svanberg says. “But I believe that will change.”

The group designed its standard to be unambiguous and easy to determine. “We have deliberately tried not to make it confusing or make some sort of 15-week audit with a 10-person team going through your business,” he says.

The three-point criteria mandates, first, that a data center have a power usage effectiveness (PUE) rating of 1.2 or less. (A PUE rating of 1.0 would mean 100 percent of the facility’s energy consumption went to powering the IT equipment. Anything above 1.0 represents additional energy spent in cooling, operations, and other non-IT energy consumption.)

Second, the center must be 100 percent powered by renewable sources. And third, it must ensure that any electric grid power that it does use produces a minuscule amount of carbon dioxide emissions (0.19 kilogram for every kilowatt-hour of IT energy consumption).

“If the data center industry does not get their head around this, I believe they will be the next coal industry,” Svanberg says. “I believe this is the time when this industry needs to take responsibility for how they grow their data center capacity.”

Editor’s note: This story is published in cooperation with more than 250 media organizations and independent journalists that have focused their coverage on climate change ahead of the U.N. Climate Action SummitIEEE Spectrum’s participation in the Covering Climate Now partnership builds on our past reporting about this global issue.

The Conversation (0)

Smokey the AI

Smart image analysis algorithms, fed by cameras carried by drones and ground vehicles, can help power companies prevent forest fires

7 min read
Smokey the AI

The 2021 Dixie Fire in northern California is suspected of being caused by Pacific Gas & Electric's equipment. The fire is the second-largest in California history.

Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images

The 2020 fire season in the United States was the worst in at least 70 years, with some 4 million hectares burned on the west coast alone. These West Coast fires killed at least 37 people, destroyed hundreds of structures, caused nearly US $20 billion in damage, and filled the air with smoke that threatened the health of millions of people. And this was on top of a 2018 fire season that burned more than 700,000 hectares of land in California, and a 2019-to-2020 wildfire season in Australia that torched nearly 18 million hectares.

While some of these fires started from human carelessness—or arson—far too many were sparked and spread by the electrical power infrastructure and power lines. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) calculates that nearly 100,000 burned hectares of those 2018 California fires were the fault of the electric power infrastructure, including the devastating Camp Fire, which wiped out most of the town of Paradise. And in July of this year, Pacific Gas & Electric indicated that blown fuses on one of its utility poles may have sparked the Dixie Fire, which burned nearly 400,000 hectares.

Until these recent disasters, most people, even those living in vulnerable areas, didn't give much thought to the fire risk from the electrical infrastructure. Power companies trim trees and inspect lines on a regular—if not particularly frequent—basis.

However, the frequency of these inspections has changed little over the years, even though climate change is causing drier and hotter weather conditions that lead up to more intense wildfires. In addition, many key electrical components are beyond their shelf lives, including insulators, transformers, arrestors, and splices that are more than 40 years old. Many transmission towers, most built for a 40-year lifespan, are entering their final decade.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less