FCC Votes "Yes" on Net Neutrality

The FCC approves Net Neutrality rules for wireless and fixed broadband

2 min read
FCC Votes "Yes" on Net Neutrality
Image: Getty Images

As expected, the Federal Communications Commission today approved proposed Net Neutrality rules by a 3 to 2 vote. Two Democrats joined FCC chairman Tom Wheeler in voting for the rules. Two Republicans dissented at great length. The audience at the open meeting greeted the approval with loud applause. The rules apply to both wireless and fixed broadband. 

At the heart of the FCC proposal are three "bright line rules" embraced by net neutrality advocates. They bar broadband providers from blocking or throttling legal content and services transmitted over the Internet, and prohibit providers from charging content or service providers such as Netflix a premium for high-speed connections. 

The Internet is too important to allow broadband providers to be the ones making the rules.

Throttling became a hot-button issue after widespread claims that cable companies had deliberately slowed to a crawl streaming video from third-party services such as Netflix. Cable companies denied they deliberately throttled the video traffic, and a study [PDF] by Measurement Lab found the choke points were at interconnections between local broadband services and long-distance traffic routes. But users remained worried that broadband providers could throttle traffic if they wanted to. 

Net neutrality advocates also jumped on plans for paid priority services because of worries that they could create a two-tier Internet, with the fast lanes reserved for companies with deep pockets. Cable companies contributed to that concern when they pressed large content providers such as Netflix to pay them to make direct high-speed connections.

The new rules do allow carriers to use "reasonable network management" techniques other than paid prioritization, as needed for various services. Details are not yet available, but this presumably would allow assignment of priority codes to speed transmission of packets carrying time-sensitive data such as for voice telephony and interactive gaming.

An earlier FCC attempt to impose open Internet rules was blocked by the courts on the ground that the agency lacked authority. The new FCC proposal seeks to overcome that limit by classifying broadband Internet service as a "Title II telecommunications service" akin to wireline telephony, which it does have the authority to regulate.

Republican commissioners vehemently objected both to using Title II authority and to giving the FCC authority to regulate the Internet. "The Internet is not broken, there is no problem for the government to solve," said commissioner Ajit Pai. Retorted Wheeler, "The Internet is too important to allow broadband providers to be the ones making the rules."

The Conversation (0)

How Police Exploited the Capitol Riot’s Digital Records

Forensic technology is powerful, but is it worth the privacy trade-offs?

11 min read
Vertical
 Illustration of the silhouette of a person with upraised arm holding a cellphone in front of the U.S. Capitol building. Superimposed on the head is a green matrix, which represents data points used for facial recognition
Gabriel Zimmer
Green

The group of well-dressed young men who gathered on the outskirts of Baltimore on the night of 5 January 2021 hardly looked like extremists. But the next day, prosecutors allege, they would all breach the United States Capitol during the deadly insurrection. Several would loot and destroy media equipment, and one would assault a policeman.

No strangers to protest, the men, members of the America First movement, diligently donned masks to obscure their faces. None boasted of their exploits on social media, and none of their friends or family would come forward to denounce them. But on 5 January, they made one piping hot, family-size mistake: They shared a pizza.

Keep Reading ↓Show less
{"imageShortcodeIds":[]}