Tech Talk iconTech Talk

The Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition Wants You to Make a Video about Electronic Waste

17175.jpgToday I herded the obsolete or dead electronics in my officeâ''an ancient external hard drive that connects to no inputs on my current computer, an LCD monitor that has become excruciatingly hard to read, bunches of old power supplies and dead rechargeable batteries, a tangle of redundant cables, and that box of empty printer cartridges Iâ''ve been meaning to drop off somewhereâ''into a pile of electronic waste. This wasnâ''t random busywork; on Monday our neighborhood is getting a free e-waste pickup from One World Recycling. Last time I tackled the electronic waste that accumulates in my house (an obsolete iMac, a few dead VCRs), I had to take them to Green Citizen and pay a recycling fee for the non-display hardware, so I donâ''t want to miss this opportunity.

This pile of e-waste offers another opportunity, if I can just figure out how to turn next weekâ''s recycling day into a catchy 90-second movie, because the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition is offering cash for the best videos about the e-waste problem and responsible recycling.

So far, I donâ''t have any brilliant ideas. But if you do, here are the contest details:

Videos can be no longer than 90 seconds and must show the human and environmental impacts of e-waste, the toxic chemicals found in e-waste, and what it means to recycle responsibly, and encourage others to communicate about the e-waste problem and the use of responsible recyclers.

You submit your video on YouTube, and fill out a separate entry form. Information on both is on the SVTC web site. The deadline is June 12, the current date of the analog television shutdown, which may create a wave of electronic waste. First prize is $500.

IEEE Celebrates 125 Years of Engineering the Future

Happy Birthday, IEEE!

IEEE, the world's largest technical professional society, is commemorating its 125th anniversary today with a variety of activities including the first IEEE Engineering the Future Day. Follow all events on the IEEE 125th Anniversary Web site.

Engineering the Future Day, which takes place on IEEEâ''s â''officialâ'' anniversary date, recognizes the contributions and impact that IEEE, its members and engineering and technology professionals have made for the benefit of humanity.

Designed to raise public awareness of the diverse opportunities in different technology fields, Engineering the Future Day is part of a series of celebrations in major world cities throughout the year in an effort to increase awareness of technology advancements around the world. IEEE groups from Belgium to India, to Australia and Panama and around the U.S. have local celebrations planned for today, and additional celebrations are planned for throughout the year.

Today also kicks off two competitions that were launched in conjunction with IEEEâ''s 125th Anniversary:

IEEE Presidentsâ'' Change the World Competition â'' Beginning on today IEEE members and the public may cast their vote for the peopleâ''s choice award in the Presidentsâ'' competition from among the 15 finalists posted on the Web site. The competition, which invites students or teams of students to identify a real-world problem and apply engineering, science, computing and leadership skills to solve it, closed 28 February. Prizes will be awarded to the finalists in June.

IEEE Engineering Your World Competition â'' Kicking off on Engineering the Future Day, this contest, open to everyone, invites individuals to submit videos of how they use science, engineering or technology to make their living spaces (i.e. â'' dorm, apartment, car, work area, etc.) more livable, fun and convenient. A panel of judges will select the top five entries which will compete in online voting competitions. Details will be posted today on the IEEE 125th Anniversary Web site.

Checking in on Dream Jobber David Downey at the 2009 Kansas City Corporate Challenge

djobdav01.jpgRemember David Downey, featured in IEEE Spectrumâ''s February 2008 Dream Jobs Special Report? Downey, an EE working on fitness equipment for Garmin International in Kansas City, KS, also organizes that companyâ''s team for the annual Kansas City Corporate Challenge going on right now (and in its thirtieth year). Entrants compete in a vast variety of sportsâ''those you might expect, like basketball, soccer, football, swimming, and trackâ''as well as those you might not expect, like darts, bowling, fishing, and tug-of-war.

Downey reports that the Garmin team is doing well this year, in second place in its division at the end of the first full week of competition. He personally is competing in the bike race and the triathalon; the triathalon fitting neatly in with the final testing of his latest product for Garmin, the Forerunner 310XT, a GPS watch designed for triathletes, designed to track distance, pace, and heart rate, in and out of the water; it also tracks the transition time between events. It will go on the market 8 June.

Nanotechnology Detractors Grumble over Lack of Public Concern

Sometimes it can be just so frustrating when trying to stir up public hysteria and all you get is a shoulder shrug. So goes the lament in this article, entitled â''Fearing the Invisibleâ''Selling Nanotechnology Hazardsâ'' at the Safety at Work blog.

It seems like all the effort to link nanotechnology to asbestos has just not got the public demanding a total moratorium on nanotechnology as some NGOs have proposed.

This lack of response could be that the main evidence that finds a similarity in the behavior between asbestos and some nanoparticles (namely, multi-walled nanotubes (MWNTs)) rests upon research of Ken Donaldson at Edinburg University, which did not really address the issues of dose and exposure.

No, the author of the article is probably right, it has little to do with the science, but rather how effective the sell has been on the connection. At least one of the problems, according to the author, is that itâ''s hard to get people afraid of the invisible. Not sure I am buying that one since the unknown of anything thatâ''s invisible (say, for example, the swine flu virus) does a pretty good job of freaking people out beyond all reason.

The article comes a little closer to the mark when it points out that unlike asbestos, which had visible products such as roofing or insulation materials, nanotechnology may be contained in products but people canâ''t â''seeâ'' the nanotechnology.

Thatâ''s not quite right either, Iâ''m afraid.

I think one possibility not discussed in the article for the causes of the â''Who cares?â'' attitude could be that the idea of over 500 consumer products that use nanomaterials just doesnâ''t stir up a lot of public concern.

Another possibility may be that while ignorance can be fantastic accelerant for fueling public hysteria, it seems in the case of nanotechnology to be mated to such complete apathy to try and learn anything about the subject that it never seems to ignite.

Or a third option might be that the prospects of better treatments to disease like cancer, or improving alternative energy sources like photovoltaics may be a bit of better tradeoff than better pipe insulation and roofing shingles we got from asbestos.

You know, the public may be on to something.

Space Shuttle Heads for Orbiting Telescope One Last Time

The shuttle Atlantis blasted off today on the final scheduled mission to service the Hubble Space Telescope.

The US $900 million mission, designated STS-125, will rendezvous with the orbiting observatory Wednesday and begin performing a series of procedures in space intended to upgrade the Hubble with sophisticated new equipment that should extend its functionality for years.

During the 11-day trip, astronauts from Atlantis are tasked with installing two new instruments, repairing two inactive ones, and swapping out a number of key components. The crew will perform five spacewalks over five days to complete the servicing operations, one of which will involve installing a replacement for the Hubble's faulty Science Instrument Command and Data Handling Unit, which failed in September 2008, temporarily blinding the telescope (please see Hubble Telescope Failure Causes NASA to Scramble). That equipment failure delayed the current mission for seven months, as NASA labored to construct a replacement.

The crew of STS-125 consists of its commander, Scott Altman, pilot Gregory C. Johnson (Capt., USN Ret.), and mission specialists John Grunsfeld, Mike Massimino, Andrew Feustel, Michael Good, and Megan McArthur.

"The teams here at [Kennedy Space Center] gave us a great vehicle, and ascent was good," said Bill Gerstenmaier, NASA's associate administrator for space operations, after the launch. "It was a great start to a very challenging mission."

In a widely publicized move, NASA has taken the unique precaution of preparing another shuttle launch vehicle, for the Endeavour, to sit on a pad at Cape Canaveral and place a four-member crew on standby, just in case a major malfunction should occur during the Atlantis mission. Previous planned missions in years past were canceled for safety concerns. The Hubble travels in an orbit that is much further from the earth than the International Space Station and inhabited by much more debris, or "space junk," raising the level of concern at NASA.

Here's to hoping that the space agency does not have to resort to such a drastic emergency measure.

Life After DARPA


After the end of his 8-year tenure as director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in February, Tony Tether signed on today to become a member of the board of Massachusetts-based Qteros. Qteros as far as I can tell from the dense thicket of jargon in the press release is a technology transition biofuels company.*

What Tony Tether will bring to the company will be experience with transitioning new technologies--the one-off DARPA research results (for example Dean Kamenâ''s Luke Arm prototype) and making such products commercially producible and reproducible.

Qteros makes cellulosic ethanol. The original research came out of the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Heavy hitters like BP and Valero have contributed investment dollars since.

Qteros, formerly known as SunEthanol, has developed a proprietary, game-changing technology known as "C3" (Complete Cellulosic Conversion), using the Q Microbe. First discovered in Western Massachusetts by Qteros Founder and Chief Scientist Dr. Susan Leschine, the Q Microbe has the unique ability to transform virtually any cellulosic material into ethanol.

As Spectrum editor Bill Sweet explained back in December, cellulosic alcohol has given the new Democratic leadership a graceful retreat from a reckless prior love affair with corn ethanol.

*corrected 5/13/2009

Nanoelectrode probes single cells with minimal damage

Researchers at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign have developed a needle less than 100 nanometers thick that can be used to deliver molecules into single cells and collect electro-chemical recordings. The group has published its work in Nano Letters.

Over the past 5 years, other groups have unveiled similar nano-needles, but to my knowledge there are two characteristics that make this one superior. Instead of tapering to a point, the needle remains the same width along its entire length, allowing researchers to fully insert it without increasing damage to the cell; It is also capable of delivering single molecules into a cell.

It's this second characteristic that makes the development so exciting and could lead to a whole slew of new ways to investigate cells at the molecular level.

The probe is fashioned from a boron-nitride nanotube and then coated in a thin layer of gold that allowed the researchers to temporarily dock molecules onto the tip. Once inside the environment of the cell, the molecules break free from the gold. Min-Feng Yu, the lead author on the paper, used the needle in his own studies to transfer quantum dots into the cytoplasm of living cells.

He expressed his expectations for the device in an email to me:

"The significance of having such functional electrochemical needle probes is that it is now possible to directly interface with biological system at the cellular level and communicate the intracellular activities with external electronic circuitry. This can then potentially lead to the development of bioelectronics at the individual cell level either for the fundamental study of cell [sic] itself or for controlling or exploiting the complex biological processes in cell for practical sensing or other broad applications."

Sun Micro Says It May Have Broken Bribery Laws

In the middle of a blockbuster takeover by Oracle Corp., Sun Microsystems has admitted that it may have violated U.S. anti-bribery statutes recently.

According to a news report from the Associated Press, the management at Sun has informed the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission that an internal review found evidence of wrongdoing in transactions committed on its behalf. The AP report notes that Sun revealed the potentially illegal activity to executives at Oracle prior to the announcement of its US $7.4 billion acquisition offer three weeks ago. The alleged bribery took place in an unspecified location outside of the United States by one or more unnamed individuals, the AP reported Friday, drawing on public documents filed with the SEC.

The regulatory statements from Sun stated that the Santa Clara, Calif., computer firm had found "potential violations" of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by its employees and that it has since taken remedial measures to begin making amends. The Justice Department and the SEC have reportedly opened investigations into the matter. The AP was unable to get a spokesperson for Sun to comment officially on the news.

Liability for the illicit activity could range from hefty fines to criminal indictments, with the federal government possibly even banning Sun from participation in future government contract awards for a period, a major source of revenue for Sun.

The news of corruption within its midst marks yet another black eye for Sun, which has been roiled by management blunders in recent years. Look for the resignation of a top executive at Sun to be forthcoming in the weeks ahead, at the very least.

EPAâ¿¿s Nanomaterial Stewardship Program is Encouraging to Some and a Failure to Others

Back in January 2008, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) launched a program called the Nanomaterials Stewardship Program in which companies manufacturing products containing nanomaterials would be asked to provide voluntarily information on those materials to the EPA.

In a recent article, entitled Nanotechnology: New Risks but No Rules, published by the Miller-McCune Center for Research, Media and Public Policy, the author after making a bit of a mess of his nanotechnology definition and array of applications presents two different perspectives on the how the EPA program has fared to date.

Well, not really. He presents one and trots out the other for ridicule. We are initially presented with Richard Denisonâ''s, senior scientist with the Environmental Defense Fund, rather dark assessment of the program. We get what I imagine for the author constitutes fair and balanced reporting with phrases like â''â'¿11 months into the program, only 29 companies and organizations had enrolled, submitting information on a mere 123 out of a total of 2,084 potential nanomaterials.â''

In case you didnâ''t notice the words â''onlyâ'' and â''mereâ'' were to indicate to us that these numbers fall rather short of what they should be. And he gets Denison to chime in with agreement. Oh boy, big businesses are being bad.

And to give you further evidence of their bad behavior, the author presents a chemical industry spokesman who says that the voluntary program has been successful in getting the largest players in the field of nanotech to sign up. How dare he, especially after the author and Denison had so clearly established what a failure it is.

After making its main point the article does manage to get down to the real issue facing regulating nanomaterials: do you regulate a material because of its chemical composition or its particle size? You know, are carbon nanotubes graphite or something different?

This is a big issue and so it gets bounced to the back of the article. And what is the answer to this problem? Why put at least $100 million into researching it, of course. Fair enough, but could you maybe give us a theoretical framework by which we reinvent the periodic table?

The funny part of this is that the one specific nanomaterial mentioned in the article, nanosilver, could be a risk not because of its particle size but because silver ions may be released from the product it is integrated into. In other words, its risk appears to be associated with its chemical composition rather than its size.

Oh dear, this does get complicated. Maybe we should make it $200 million.


Tech Talk

IEEE Spectrum’s general technology blog, featuring news, analysis, and opinions about engineering, consumer electronics, and technology and society, from the editorial staff and freelance contributors.

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up for the Tech Alert newsletter and receive ground-breaking technology and science news from IEEE Spectrum every Thursday.

Load More