The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

Not Surprising: Brain Scans Show Humans Empathize With Robots

Nobody likes to see robots getting tortured, but scans reveal that it bothers us almost as much as seeing it happen to humans

3 min read
Not Surprising: Brain Scans Show Humans Empathize With Robots

Last year, we posted about a study investigating whether people care if a robot friend of theirs gets unfairly stuffed into a closet, featuring one of the saddest robot videos ever. Turns out, people do care. A lot. And they care even though robots don't have feelings. Today, we're looking at another study from researchers at the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany that uses a functional MRI procedure to see just exactly how much people empathize with robots compared to humans.

IEEE Spectrum contributor Charles Q. Choi has a detailed story on this, with psychologists and experts in human-machine interaction describing how they see the experiment. Below, I include some more details and also my own take on the results.

From the study:

In the first study, 40 participants watched videos of a small dinosaur-shaped robot that was treated in an affectionate or a violent way and measured their level of physiological arousal and asked for their emotional state directly after the videos. Participants reported to feel more negative watching the robot being abused and showed higher arousal during the negative video.

The second study conducted in collaboration with the Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Essen, used functional magnetic-resonance imaging (fMRI), to investigate potential brain correlations of human-robot interaction in contrast to human-human interaction. The 14 participants were presented videos showing a human, a robot and an inanimate object, again being treated in either an affectionate or in a violent way. Affectionate interaction towards both, the robot and the human, resulted in similar neural activation patterns in classic limbic structures, indicating that they elicit similar emotional reactions. However, when comparing only the videos showing abusive behavior differences in neural activity suggested that participants show more negative empathetic concern for the human in the abuse condition.

Here's one of the videos used in the study. Warning: not safe for lovers of robots.

Okay, well, I suppose it's probably unrealistic to expect that humans should feel just as empathetic towards robots as they do towards other humans, but what I'm really curious about at this point is how much more empathetic we (might) feel towards an animal than towards a robot. And you've got to figure that there's a line somewhere. Like, would we feel more empathetic towards dogs and cats than towards robots? Sure. Rabbits? Probably. Turtles? Maybe. Insects? Probably not. But where is that line, and why does it exist where it does? And what does that say about us, and the future of human-robot interaction?

Here's what really kerfuffles my noggin: when I read about these sorts of studies, I think to myself, "I know exactly what's going on here." I mean, I know that this robot is getting a certain pattern of sensor input from the user, and that input pattern is calling up some code written by a human that instructs servos to move and sound files to play. The robot isn't feeling anything. It's just executing a series of commands that are specifically designed to exploit certain human emotions.

But it doesn't matter.

I have a Pleo. I would never do this to my Pleo. Never, ever, ever. Because it would be cruel. I don't care that it's a robot, and I don't care that it doesn't have emotions, because I have emotions. And ultimately, that's what it's about, isn't it? So maybe this research just says good things about humans. Maybe this means that we really are decent folk, and that we'll treat robots well because not treating robots well reflects badly on ourselves.

Via [ LiveScience ]

The Conversation (0)

The Bionic-Hand Arms Race

The prosthetics industry is too focused on high-tech limbs that are complicated, costly, and often impractical

12 min read
A photograph of a young woman with brown eyes and neck length hair dyed rose gold sits at a white table. In one hand she holds a carbon fiber robotic arm and hand. Her other arm ends near her elbow. Her short sleeve shirt has a pattern on it of illustrated hands.

The author, Britt Young, holding her Ottobock bebionic bionic arm.

Gabriela Hasbun. Makeup: Maria Nguyen for MAC cosmetics; Hair: Joan Laqui for Living Proof

In Jules Verne’s 1865 novel From the Earth to the Moon, members of the fictitious Baltimore Gun Club, all disabled Civil War veterans, restlessly search for a new enemy to conquer. They had spent the war innovating new, deadlier weaponry. By the war’s end, with “not quite one arm between four persons, and exactly two legs between six,” these self-taught amputee-weaponsmiths decide to repurpose their skills toward a new projectile: a rocket ship.

The story of the Baltimore Gun Club propelling themselves to the moon is about the extraordinary masculine power of the veteran, who doesn’t simply “overcome” his disability; he derives power and ambition from it. Their “crutches, wooden legs, artificial arms, steel hooks, caoutchouc [rubber] jaws, silver craniums [and] platinum noses” don’t play leading roles in their personalities—they are merely tools on their bodies. These piecemeal men are unlikely crusaders of invention with an even more unlikely mission. And yet who better to design the next great leap in technology than men remade by technology themselves?

Keep Reading ↓Show less