2009 DC Metro Fatal Crash: All Parties Admit Liability

Still years before computer control of subway trains is returned

2 min read
2009 DC Metro Fatal Crash: All Parties Admit Liability

In June 2009, a Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA aka DC Metro) Red Line subway train traveling at a high rate of speed rear-ended a stationary subway train, killing nine people including the train's operator, with 52 injured passengers sent to the area hospitals. At the time, the Washington Post stated that given Metro's automated safety systems the crash was supposed to be "impossible."

In July of 2010, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) concluded that the probable cause of the collision was

"... a failure of the track circuit modules that caused the automatic train control (ATC) system to lose detection of one train, allowing a second train to strike it from the rear. The NTSB also cited WMATA for its failure to ensure that a verification test developed after a 2005 incident near Rosslyn station was used system wide. This test would have identified the faulty track circuit before the accident."

In other words, the accident was attributable to not just faulty equipment but also a faulty safety culture within the DC Metro organization that essentially created a situation where an accident was inevitable.

On Tuesday, the Washington Examinerreported that all the parties to the accident—DC Metro which managed, operated and monitored train operations; Alstom Signaling and Ansaldo STS USA, which supplied components that were part of Metro train control and detection system; and ARINC, which supplied the software that monitored the movement of trains—are not contesting their liability in the crash.

This is the first time that DC Metro publicly admitted responsibility for the crash, the Examiner says.

The NTSB recommended a number of safety improvements to the DC Metro, which, to its credit, it has been implementing at a cost of over $1 billion. It will still be a few more years, however, before all the upgraded safety equipment is in place so that train operations are returned to automatic control from their current manual operation.

For a full list of blog posts on the crash and the NTSB's investigation of it, go to the search box at the top of the page, specify "blogs," and enter "DC Metro."

The Conversation (0)

We Need More Than Just Electric Vehicles

To decarbonize road transport we need to complement EVs with bikes, rail, city planning, and alternative energy

11 min read
A worker works on the frame of a car on an assembly line.

China has more EVs than any other country—but it also gets most of its electricity from coal.

VCG/Getty Images
Green

EVs have finally come of age. The total cost of purchasing and driving one—the cost of ownership—has fallen nearly to parity with a typical gasoline-fueled car. Scientists and engineers have extended the range of EVs by cramming ever more energy into their batteries, and vehicle-charging networks have expanded in many countries. In the United States, for example, there are more than 49,000 public charging stations, and it is now possible to drive an EV from New York to California using public charging networks.

With all this, consumers and policymakers alike are hopeful that society will soon greatly reduce its carbon emissions by replacing today’s cars with electric vehicles. Indeed, adopting electric vehicles will go a long way in helping to improve environmental outcomes. But EVs come with important weaknesses, and so people shouldn’t count on them alone to do the job, even for the transportation sector.

Keep Reading ↓Show less