Virginia Information Technologies Agency Believes in the Perfect Network Fairy

Used to Have Redundant Network Capability Before Outsourcing Contract, But No More

2 min read
Virginia Information Technologies Agency Believes in the Perfect Network Fairy

Okay, how many of you would willingly sign a multi-billion dollar IT outsourcing contract that didn't include a contract deliverable requiring that redundancy be provided for your organization's critical infrastructure networks?

None of you?

Well, we the taxpayers of Virginia need you to go work for our Virginia Information Technologies Agency (VITA).

Apparently, when VITA negotiated its 10-year, $2.3 billion outsourcing contract with Northrop Grumman to modernize Virginia's 85 state government agencies' IT systems and networks, it forgot to require network that backup capability be provided in case of network failure, the Richmond Times-Disptachreported over the weekend.

The new Virginia state CIO, George F. Coulter, was quoted as saying,

"The first thing I noticed was that the network that Northrop Grumman rolled out didn't have redundancy, backup. .. The contract does not call for redundancy in carriers . . . in the network. .. Why that wasn't put into the network, I don't know. This is a service we have to have."

During the first six months of 2009, Virginia's Department of Transportation (VDOT) experienced 101 significant IT outages totaling 4,677 hours: an average of more than 46 hours per outage. One outage, the Times-Dispatch said, took 360 hours to correct. The state's Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has experienced over the course of 5 weeks this autumn some 12 outages that put individual DMV offices out of business for a total of more than 100 hours the paper says.

Before the outsourcing contract, VDOT had network redundancy.

So much for the benefits of IT modernization.

The state is now planning an emergency meeting in early December to try to figure out how to negotiate this capability into its outsourcing contract with Northrop Grumman. CIO Coutler says he doesn't having pricing on it yet, nor a timeline on how it would take to roll-out out.

Somehow, I don't think Northrop Grumman is going to provide it cheaply or quickly.

I also wonder how much the lack of providing network redundancy made up some of the original cost savings the IT outsourcing contract supposedly would generate.

You can read more about this troubled contract here and here.

Kind of makes Texas's outsourcing problems look manageable in comparison.

The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
A plate of spaghetti made from code
Shira Inbar

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less