The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

For whatever the motivation behind the timing, the US government has decided to very publicly accuse China and Russia, as well as some unamed "US Partners" of conducting "persistent", "extensive", "sophisticated" cyber and human intelligence spying and information collection operations against US government, commercial and academic interests.

The accusations are contained in a new report to the US Congress by US intelligence agencies titled (PDF), "Foreign Spies Stealing US Economic Secrets in Cyberspace." The report, which was released yesterday, was produced by the Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive with the inputs from some 13 mostly intelligence-related US government agencies and departments.

The report highlights China and Russia as the two main cyber bad actors, with some US allies and partners also involved:

"- Chinese actors are the world’s most active and persistent perpetrators of economic espionage. US private sector firms and cybersecurity specialists have reported an onslaught of computer network intrusions that have originated in China, but the IC cannot confirm who was responsible.

- Russia’s intelligence services are conducting a range of activities to collect economic information and technology from US targets.

- Some US allies and partners use their broad access to US institutions to acquire sensitive US economic and technology information, primarily through aggressive elicitation and other human intelligence (HUMINT) tactics. Some of these states have advanced cyber capabilities."

What is interesting is that while there are large sections on Chinese and Russian spying, there is not that much detail provided on the activities of US allies and partners.

The report goes on to list some of the primary targets of cyberspying:

"- Information and communications technology (ICT), which forms the backbone of nearly every other technology.

- Business information that pertains to supplies of scarce natural resources or that provides foreign actors an edge in negotiations with US businesses or the US Government.

- Military technologies, particularly marine systems, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and other aerospace/ aeronautic technologies.

- Civilian and dual-use technologies in sectors likely to experience fast growth, such as clean energy and healthcare/pharmaceuticals."

The report says that the, "losses of sensitive economic information and technologies to foreign entities represent significant costs to US national security," but can't put a dollar figure on the amount since:

"Estimates from academic literature on the losses from economic espionage range so widely as to be meaningless - from $2 billion to $400 billion or more a year - reflecting the scarcity of data and the variety of methods used to calculate losses."

China today called the report "irresponsible" according to Reuters, while Russia, has at least for now, apparently ignored it. I have no doubt, though, that similar reports from both countries are in the offing ready to accuse the US of the same if not worse cyber activities.

There are also a bunch of economic espionage posters the Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive has just released for those interested in plastering them up around your office cubicle or laptop.

The Conversation (0)

Why the Internet Needs the InterPlanetary File System

Peer-to-peer file sharing would make the Internet far more efficient

12 min read
Horizontal
An illustration of a series
Carl De Torres
LightBlue

When the COVID-19 pandemic erupted in early 2020, the world made an unprecedented shift to remote work. As a precaution, some Internet providers scaled back service levels temporarily, although that probably wasn’t necessary for countries in Asia, Europe, and North America, which were generally able to cope with the surge in demand caused by people teleworking (and binge-watching Netflix). That’s because most of their networks were overprovisioned, with more capacity than they usually need. But in countries without the same level of investment in network infrastructure, the picture was less rosy: Internet service providers (ISPs) in South Africa and Venezuela, for instance, reported significant strain.

But is overprovisioning the only way to ensure resilience? We don’t think so. To understand the alternative approach we’re championing, though, you first need to recall how the Internet works.

Keep Reading ↓Show less