The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

US DOT Issues E-Gizmos Guidelines for Cars

Recommending the disabling of most in-vehicle electronic devices for drivers

3 min read
US DOT Issues E-Gizmos Guidelines for Cars

Yesterday, U.S. Department of TransportationSecretary Ray LaHood announced voluntary guidelines (pdf) to "encourage automobile manufacturers to limit the distraction risk for in-vehicle electronic devices." The guidelines cover communication, entertainment, information gathering and navigation devices that are not necessary for the safe operations of a vehicle by the driver.

With electronics "driving"(pdf) new automobile features and competitive positioning, it will be interesting to see how closely the automotive manufacturers follow these guidelines. Last year, for example, Volkswagen said it viewed its vehicles as "rolling computers" and that connecting consumer electronics to its vehicles' systems was a high-priority.

The Department of Transportation press release states that the guidelines will be rolled out in three phases. Phase I suggests "criteria that manufacturers can use to ensure the systems or devices they provide in their vehicles are less likely to distract the driver with tasks not directly relevant to safely operating the vehicle, or cause undue distraction by engaging the driver's eyes or hands for more than a very limited duration while driving."

The Phase I criteria focus on electronics built into the car and address human-electronic system interface issues (e.g., limit a device's operation to one hand only). Phase I also recommends essentially disabling "in-vehicle electronic devices while driving, unless the devices are intended for use by passengers and cannot reasonably be accessed or seen by the driver, or unless the vehicle is stopped and the transmission shift lever is in park."

The basic idea is to keep the driver's hands on the wheel and eyes on the road. US DOT recommends disabling:

  • Visual-manual text messaging;
  • Visual-manual internet browsing;
  • Visual-manual social media browsing;
  • Visual-manual navigation system destination entry by address;
  • Visual-manual 10-digit phone dialing;
  • Displaying to the driver more than 30 characters of text unrelated to the driving task.

Phase II guidelines are likely to focus on "devices or systems that are not built into the vehicle but are brought into the vehicle and used while driving, including aftermarket and portable personal electronic devices such as navigation systems, smart phones, electronic tablets and pads, and other mobile communications devices."

Phase III guidelines are likely to focus on "voice-activated controls to further minimize distraction in factory-installed, aftermarket, and portable devices."

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers reacted cautiously to the announcement, the Washington Postreported. It is generally supportive of reducing the opportunity for distracted driving, but wants what it calls the "two-second rule" to be the guiding principle.  In the words of a Alliance spokesperson:

"Basically, any task behind the wheel that takes more than two seconds to complete or can’t be completed in a couple of brief chunks would be locked out or would be prohibited."

Currently, there are no penalties attached for not following the proposed DOT guidelines, which has disappointed the National Safety Council, the New York Timesreported. The NSC wants tougher, mandatory requirements not mere guidelines imposed on automotive manufacturers.

The DOT press release noted that President Obama's FY 2013 budget request includes some $330 million over the next six years to fund distracted driving programs. The programs are aimed to increase awareness of the dangers of distracted driving and encourage states to pass laws to curb it. So expect a lot more advertisements about the dangers of distracted driving for the next several years.

The guidelines, which were published in the Federal Register yesterday, have a 60-day public comment period. If the reaction of readers at the Washington Post to the news of the guidelines is any indication, DOT should expect a lot of not-so-supportive comments.

Any comments from Risk Factor readers on the guidelines? For instance, should they be mandatory as the National Safety Council is advocating?

The Conversation (0)

We Need More Than Just Electric Vehicles

To decarbonize road transport we need to complement EVs with bikes, rail, city planning, and alternative energy

11 min read
A worker works on the frame of a car on an assembly line.

China has more EVs than any other country—but it also gets most of its electricity from coal.

VCG/Getty Images
Green

EVs have finally come of age. The total cost of purchasing and driving one—the cost of ownership—has fallen nearly to parity with a typical gasoline-fueled car. Scientists and engineers have extended the range of EVs by cramming ever more energy into their batteries, and vehicle-charging networks have expanded in many countries. In the United States, for example, there are more than 49,000 public charging stations, and it is now possible to drive an EV from New York to California using public charging networks.

With all this, consumers and policymakers alike are hopeful that society will soon greatly reduce its carbon emissions by replacing today’s cars with electric vehicles. Indeed, adopting electric vehicles will go a long way in helping to improve environmental outcomes. But EVs come with important weaknesses, and so people shouldn’t count on them alone to do the job, even for the transportation sector.

Keep Reading ↓Show less