Too Close for Comfort

Maybe Gillette's M3Power has just too much pulsing action

3 min read

When I was a boy on the verge of manhood, my father advised me to put off shaving for as long as possible: he warned me that it would change from a fun, optional kind of thing to a necessary one rather quickly.

Impetuousness beat out common sense, and one morning a few days shy of my 13th birthday, I found myself leaning over the bathroom sink sporting a full foam beard. I scraped carefully, and my dad's double-edge Wilkinson Sword safety razor annihilated the downy growth on my cheeks and upper lip in about five strokes.

After a couple of years, I was grooming a hirsute beast that sleepily regarded me in the mirror every morning, hacking at an increasingly bristly growth from cheekbones to chest. My father was right. Shaving had become for me what it is for many men and quite a few women: a boring daily chore only rock stars can ignore.

Over the years I've toyed with straight razors and disposable ones, electric razors with floating heads and electric razors with screens, and razors with one blade, two, and three. I finally settled on Gillette's Mach3 Turbo triple-bladed razor, whose long-lasting cartridges give me a consistently smooth, fast shave. Lots of other men agree--it's the best-selling razor in the world.

I was never tempted to switch--until last April, when Gillette offered me a trial of a prototype battery-powered, motorized version of my beloved Mach3. This was the M3Power, formally launched in May in a bid to steal a march on its archrival, Schick-WilkinsonSword. Just like Pepsi and Coke, these two behemoths have taken to trying to carve out new niches by introducing a stream of variations on a basic product.

Photo: Gillette

HANDY HANDLE

The Gillette M3Power uses an AAA battery in its handle to power its "pulsing action."

You could call the US $15 M3Power the diet Vanilla Coke of razors. Hefting it in my hand, I found it to be only slightly heavier than my regular $5 Mach3, owing mostly to the AAA battery in the handle and the small motor-driven oscillating mechanism that makes the blades vibrate. As with the Mach3, the disposable blade cartridge snaps onto the end of the handle. Gillette claims the vibration stimulates facial hair to stand up and away from the skin, allowing for a closer shave.

I must admit to a certain thrill when I pressed the power button on the electric-green handle and the razor vibrated enthusiastically in my hand. My follicles would be stimulated, hairs standing stiff, eager for the harvest.

Clad in a terry cloth robe for the occasion, I turned to the Gillette publicist who delivered the prototype to IEEE Spectrum 's offices, where I was to try out the M3Power in our men's room. She never left my side--and couldn't leave without the M3Power, lest I hawk it on eBay before its release or, worse, sell it to Schick-WilkinsonSword for some reverse-engineering to get around the 62 patents Gillette claims to have on the invention.

I took the M3Power to my gel-lathered face, attacking some four-day stubble on my left cheek. It fared well, but no better than the regular Mach3 I used on my right cheek. So far, it was a tie. But not for long. Things got downright nasty when I went to work under my chin, using the M3Power exclusively. Hello, nicks, cuts, razor burn, blood, and general unpleasantness. I hadn't experienced a burn like this since...well, I can't remember when, honestly.

Photo: Stephen Cass

THE AFTERMATH

Nicks and razor burn sent this Spectrum editor back to his old Gillette Mach3 Turbo.

Maybe my follicles were overstimulated, I theorized aloud, my hairs too excited, the blades pulling up just enough skin to nick. Or maybe there was a little too much hard-core vibrating action.

The publicist corrected me for saying "vibrating." "Pulsing action is what Gillette calls it," she said.

Tomayto, tomahto. If I want my hairs to stand on end when I'm shaving, I'll just have my wife throw the toaster in the shower with me.

Keep Reading ↓Show less

This article is for IEEE members only. Join IEEE to access our full archive.

Join the world’s largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to all of Spectrum’s articles, podcasts, and special reports. Learn more →

If you're already an IEEE member, please sign in to continue reading.

Membership includes:

  • Get unlimited access to IEEE Spectrum content
  • Follow your favorite topics to create a personalized feed of IEEE Spectrum content
  • Save Spectrum articles to read later
  • Network with other technology professionals
  • Establish a professional profile
  • Create a group to share and collaborate on projects
  • Discover IEEE events and activities
  • Join and participate in discussions

From WinZips to Cat GIFs, Jacob Ziv’s Algorithms Have Powered Decades of Compression

The lossless-compression pioneer received the 2021 IEEE Medal of Honor

11 min read
Vertical
Photo of Jacob Ziv
Photo: Rami Shlush
Yellow

Lossless data compression seems a bit like a magic trick. Its cousin, lossy compression, is easier to comprehend. Lossy algorithms are used to get music into the popular MP3 format and turn a digital image into a standard JPEG file. They do this by selectively removing bits, taking what scientists know about the way we see and hear to determine which bits we'd least miss. But no one can make the case that the resulting file is a perfect replica of the original.

Not so with lossless data compression. Bits do disappear, making the data file dramatically smaller and thus easier to store and transmit. The important difference is that the bits reappear on command. It's as if the bits are rabbits in a magician's act, disappearing and then reappearing from inside a hat at the wave of a wand.

Keep Reading ↓Show less