The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

The Beatles' Rock Band Vs. Yours

Is there too much Beatles in the Beatles game?

2 min read

Yes, the new Beatles Rock Band game is great for all the reasons you've heard - including those I mention in my cover story for Spectrum.  But now that I've had a couple weeks to play around with the finished product, there's something I'm wondering:  is one rock band too much for one game?

Part of what made Guitar Hero and Rock Band great was their ability to transport you, the player, onto the stage.  You felt like you were the star, even when you were playing well known songs.  You weren't limited to one artist, you could make your own playlist from a variety of songs - the dumber and louder the better.  Plus, you weren't assuming the role of some celebrity.  You made your own avatars.  The characters on screen were nobodies, and when you scored big it felt kind of like getting discovered. The Nowhere Man (or Woman) was you.

From the second you boot up the Beatles game, though, you know who owns this club.  It's all Fab, all the time, from the Cavern Club to the psychedelic montages.  There is no you, there is just Them.   I wonder how the game would have felt if it had all the incredible Beatles songs, but without the John/Paul/George/Ringo avatars.   Or if you subbed out one of the Fab Four and put yourself on stage with them instead.  My guess is that it would felt better.  Also, the songs aren't dumb and loud by any stretch - no Eye of the Tiger here - instead their smart and quiet, another problem.  When was the last time you air-guitared "Strawberry Fields?"  It's presumptuous to think that every song will work in a Rock Band game, and the fact is that many of the Beatles songs don't. 

The game is an amazing technical and artistic achievement, but it is not the greatest videogame of all time - like many lazy critics would like you to believe.  It's obsequious karaoke, and the next Band game needs to put back the rock.





The Conversation (0)

Deep Learning Could Bring the Concert Experience Home

The century-old quest for truly realistic sound production is finally paying off

12 min read
Image containing multiple aspects such as instruments and left and right open hands.
Stuart Bradford

Now that recorded sound has become ubiquitous, we hardly think about it. From our smartphones, smart speakers, TVs, radios, disc players, and car sound systems, it’s an enduring and enjoyable presence in our lives. In 2017, a survey by the polling firm Nielsen suggested that some 90 percent of the U.S. population listens to music regularly and that, on average, they do so 32 hours per week.

Behind this free-flowing pleasure are enormous industries applying technology to the long-standing goal of reproducing sound with the greatest possible realism. From Edison’s phonograph and the horn speakers of the 1880s, successive generations of engineers in pursuit of this ideal invented and exploited countless technologies: triode vacuum tubes, dynamic loudspeakers, magnetic phonograph cartridges, solid-state amplifier circuits in scores of different topologies, electrostatic speakers, optical discs, stereo, and surround sound. And over the past five decades, digital technologies, like audio compression and streaming, have transformed the music industry.

Keep Reading ↓Show less