Nickel Cells Sell More-Affordable Hydrogen Power

New fuel cell efficiently generates electricity without costly precious-metal catalysts

3 min read
Conceptual photo of a hydrogen fuel cell with wheels
Science Source

Conventional hydrogen fuel cells hold great promise as clean, efficient sources of energy for vehicles and other applications, but they rely on precious-metal catalysts that drive up their cost. Now scientists have created a precious-metal-free hydrogen fuel cell with a record-high performance and durability and virtually negligible catalyst costs.

Hydrogen, the most common element in the universe, has long been touted as a clean and abundant energy alternative to fossil fuels—or at least as an ample storage medium for renewable-generated power to portably run big machinery like trains, planes, and trucks. When hydrogen reacts with oxygen in fuel cells to generate electricity, instead of yielding pollutants as fossil fuels do, the result is simply water.

Standard hydrogen fuel cells rely on acidic chemicals and catalysts made of precious metals such as platinum to drive the reactions between hydrogen and oxygen that generate electricity. In contrast, alkaline polymer electrolyte fuel cells rely on alkaline chemicals and can use earth-abundant metals as catalysts, eliminating the need for precious metals. However, these latter fuel cells still fall short on performance and durability compared to conventional fuel cells.

Now scientists have developed a precious-metal-free alkaline polymer electrolyte fuel cell with a record-high peak power density of 210 milliwatts per square centimeter, more than five times as much power as its previous counterparts.

A pair of square blue boxes sandwiches silver plates and material. It is connected by tubes to a large apparatus labelled Fuel Cell Test System. The new precious-metal-free hydrogen fuel cell boasts 5x more peak power density and 20x longer operation time than other competing comparable fuel cells. Cornell University/PNAS

The new device relies on a catalyst made of a solid nickel core surrounded by a shell 2 nanometers thick made of carbon doped with nitrogen. This catalyst is located at the anode, where the hydrogen is oxidized, or loses electrons, and is paired with a cobalt-manganese catalyst at the cathode, where oxygen is reduced, or gains electrons.

The carbon layers on the new anode catalyst help boost the rate at which hydrogen is oxidized, and the nitrogen in these carbon layers can serve as sites to spur oxidation, altogether boosting fuel cell performance. In addition, the anode catalyst’s shell prevents the nickel from oxidizing to form nickel oxides that can both dramatically slow hydrogen oxidation and lead the catalyst to deteriorate.

The new catalyst also proved dramatically more tolerant to carbon monoxide than platinum. Commercial production of hydrogen gas often results in trace amounts of carbon monoxide, so a high tolerance to carbon monoxide is key to practical hydrogen fuel cell applications.

The scientists found their new fuel cell could operate in a stable manner for more than 100 hours. In comparison, another precious-metal-free fuel cell using nickel nanoparticles essentially stopped operating within 5 hours.

The scientists do note that a conventional fuel cell with precious-metal catalysts operating under acidic conditions can deliver about 1.2 to 1.5 watts per square centimeter, roughly five to seven times as much as the new fuel cell. Still, “one has to keep in mind that acidic fuel cells have been under development for decades, while alkaline ones have been for less than 10 years,” says study coauthor Héctor Abruña, an electrochemist at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. “We feel confident that with further developments and some optimization, we could reach 1 watt per square centimeter within two to three years, which would be a major and enabling breakthrough.”

Future research might boost the fuel cell’s durability by improving the support membranes within the device, Abruña says. “While these results are very promising, a significant amount of work remains before these devices can be broadly deployed,” he notes.

The scientists detailed their findings online 21 March in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The Conversation (1)
FB TS 29 Mar, 2022

It is extremely bad idea to use hydrogen as fuel for land/sea/air transportation because it is pretty much explosive!

Imagine a future world w/ all kinds of hydrogen vehicles, tanker trucks, gas stations everywhere!

Are we seriously thinking that there will be never any accidents/leaks/ruptures/mishandling to trigger massive explosions?

Not to mention there is no need to use hydrogen for anything!

All light vehicles are already becoming electric & all heavy/big land/sea/air (diesel) vehicles

(like trucks & trains & construction/mining/agriculture/military vehicles & ships & aircraft)

just need us to start producing biodiesel/biofuel at large scales from all possible industrial/agricultural/forestry waste/biomass & even trash & sewage!

How to Prevent Blackouts by Packetizing the Power Grid

The rules of the Internet can also balance electricity supply and demand

13 min read
How to Prevent Blackouts by Packetizing the Power Grid
Dan Page

Bad things happen when demand outstrips supply. We learned that lesson too well at the start of the pandemic, when demand for toilet paper, disinfecting wipes, masks, and ventilators outstripped the available supply. Today, chip shortages continue to disrupt the consumer electronics, automobile, and other sectors. Clearly, balancing the supply and demand of goods is critical for a stable, normal, functional society.

That need for balance is true of electric power grids, too. We got a heartrending reminder of this fact in February 2021, when Texas experienced an unprecedented and deadly winter freeze. Spiking demand for electric heat collided with supply problems created by frozen natural-gas equipment and below-average wind-power production. The resulting imbalance left more than 2 million households without power for days, caused at least 210 deaths, and led to economic losses of up to US $130 billion.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less