The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

Poll Shows Concern About Drones and Domestic Surveillance

A new poll asks people what they think about domestic surveillance drones, and the answer likely won't surprise you

3 min read
Poll Shows Concern About Drones and Domestic Surveillance

With a few arguably strange exceptions, nobody likes being spied on, and when you hear the phrase "domestic surveillance," for better or worse being surveiled upon comes to mind. It's unfortunate that the recent accessibility of unmanned aircraft has gotten drones wrapped up in all of this paranoia legitimate concern, and a new poll from Monmouth University shows that people are definitely worried about law enforcement using camera-equipped drones.

The poll asked a national sample [approximately1.700 people] about four potential uses of unmanned drones by U.S. law enforcement. An overwhelming majority of Americans support the idea of using drones to help with search and rescue missions (80%). Two-thirds of the public also support using drones to track down runaway criminals (67%) and control illegal immigration on the nation’s border (64%). One area where Americans say that drones should not be used, though, is to issue speeding tickets. Only 23% support using drones for this routine police activity while a large majority of 67% oppose the idea. 

Here are the details.

1. How much have you read or heard about the use of unmanned surveillance aircraft, sometimes called drones, by the U.S. military?
A great deal  27%
Some  29%
Just a little  22%
Nothing at all  22%
2.  Do you support or oppose the use of drones to issue speeding tickets?
Support  23% 
Oppose  67%  
Don’t know  10%
3. Do you support or oppose the use of drones to control illegal immigration on the nation’s 
Support  64%
Oppose  24%
Don’t know  12%
4. Do you support or oppose the use of drones to help with search and rescue missions?
Support  80%
Oppose  11% 
Don’t know  9%
5. Do you support or oppose the use of drones to track down runaway criminals?
Support  67%
Oppose  22%
Don’t know  12%
6.  How concerned would you be about your own privacy if U.S. law enforcement started using 
unmanned drones with high tech cameras?
Very concerned  42% 
Somewhat concerned 22% 
Only a little concerned 16%
Not at all concerned 15%
Don’t know 4%

To me, these data reinforce the fact that drones (and robots in general) have a serious and not entirely logical public perception problem. For example, let's take a look at the question about drones issuing speeding tickets. It's definitely worth considering whether people would react as badly when polled on the issue of using manned aircraft to issue speeding tickets, which is a fairly common practice if all the signs they put up warning drivers about it are to be believed. If people react just as badly, then it's the ticketing, not the drone, that's the problem. If people are more comfortable with the idea of a manned aircraft issuing tickets, then we really have to start to ask questions.

For example, what if it's a manned aircraft, but tickets are issued based on a video stream sent to a police officer on the ground? Or what if it's a manned aircraft with an officer inside it ticketing speeders, but the aircraft is on autopilot? The point here is that there's essentially no difference between the functionality of a manned aircraft for this purpose compared to the functionality of an unmanned aircraft, not to mention that technically a manned aircraft on autopilot is more of a "drone" than an unmanned aircraft being continuously remote controlled, so what is it that people are worried about? 

My point here is that it's important to distinguish between whether people are bothered by the drone itself, or what the drone is doing, and it may be that the poll just doesn't go deep enough to figure out which one it is. Having said that, it's certainly true that drones are a technology that makes it cheaper and easier to conduct surveillance, and there isn't (yet) much in the way of a legal framework to prevent or restrict it. What it's important to remember, though, and even more important to communicate to people who are less familiar with robots, is that robots are tools. We build them, we program them, and we decide what it is or is not okay for them to do.

[ Poll (PDF) ] via [ CNN ]

The Conversation (0)

The Bionic-Hand Arms Race

The prosthetics industry is too focused on high-tech limbs that are complicated, costly, and often impractical

12 min read
A photograph of a young woman with brown eyes and neck length hair dyed rose gold sits at a white table. In one hand she holds a carbon fiber robotic arm and hand. Her other arm ends near her elbow. Her short sleeve shirt has a pattern on it of illustrated hands.

The author, Britt Young, holding her Ottobock bebionic bionic arm.

Gabriela Hasbun. Makeup: Maria Nguyen for MAC cosmetics; Hair: Joan Laqui for Living Proof

In Jules Verne’s 1865 novel From the Earth to the Moon, members of the fictitious Baltimore Gun Club, all disabled Civil War veterans, restlessly search for a new enemy to conquer. They had spent the war innovating new, deadlier weaponry. By the war’s end, with “not quite one arm between four persons, and exactly two legs between six,” these self-taught amputee-weaponsmiths decide to repurpose their skills toward a new projectile: a rocket ship.

The story of the Baltimore Gun Club propelling themselves to the moon is about the extraordinary masculine power of the veteran, who doesn’t simply “overcome” his disability; he derives power and ambition from it. Their “crutches, wooden legs, artificial arms, steel hooks, caoutchouc [rubber] jaws, silver craniums [and] platinum noses” don’t play leading roles in their personalities—they are merely tools on their bodies. These piecemeal men are unlikely crusaders of invention with an even more unlikely mission. And yet who better to design the next great leap in technology than men remade by technology themselves?

Keep Reading ↓Show less