The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

Mozilla and NSF Hand Out $1.6 Million to Wireless Challenge Winners

An emergency communications network in a suitcase (or two) and an 80-foot tower for line-of-sight broadband connections claim top honors

2 min read
The Southern Connected Communities Network tower
The Southern Connected Communities Network tower.
Photo: Southern Connected Communities Network

In 2017, Mozilla and the National Science Foundation asked two questions: How can we reconnect people to the Internet and other communications networks quickly and easily when disaster takes out access? And how can we permanently connect currently unconnected communities in an affordable and scalable way?

To encourage developers to get serious about finding answers, they offered US $2 million in prize money in what they tagged the Wireless Innovation for a Networked Society challenge.

This week, the organizations awarded $1.6 million in prizes. These came on top of $400,000 that went out earlier this year to help 20 finalists get from design to working prototype.

Claiming top honors and $400,000 each were HERMES, from Rhizomatica in Philadelphia, and the Southern Connected Communities Network (SCCN) from the Highlander Research and Education Center in New Market, Tenn.
 

Technical diagram of the HERMES system.Illustration: Rhizomatica

HERMES, for “High-frequency Emergency and Rural Multimedia Exchange System,” is a communications network in a suitcase (actually, two suitcases) that can step in when traditional networks are down by using 2G GSM to connect to users and a shortwave radio system with a telescoping antenna as a backhaul. HERMES enables local calling, SMS texting, and the use of messaging apps like WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger. The innovation won in the Off-the-Grid Internet category.

SCCN uses an 80-foot tower to connect to an Internet access point and to  homes up to 25 miles away, using line-of-sight connections in the unlicensed wireless spectrum. The team has a working prototype in New Market, Tenn., connecting to an access point in Knoxville. SCCN took the top prize in the Smart Community Networks category.

Winning smaller cash prizes for Off-the-Grid Internet innovations were:

  • Project Lantern by Paper & Equator in collaboration with the Shared Reality Lab at McGill University, a portable Wi-Fi hotspot that can connect to other hotspots to create an open Wi-Fi network along with apps that allow users to transmit messages and maps ($200,000).

  • EmergenCell by Spencer Sevilla, a carrier-independent LTE network in a box that uses roaming features to support all cellphones within range, and beefs up its usefulness during emergencies by preinstalling critical emergency applications ($100,000).

  • Wind by the Guardian Project, an effort to use existing radios and sensors in smartphones to create decentralized communications networks ($50,000).

And the second- through fourth-place winners for Smart Community Networks were:

  • The Equitable Internet Initiative by Allied Media Projects, an effort to bring the Internet to more households in Detroit through shared connections ($250,000).

  • SMARTI by the San Antonio Housing Authority, a solar-powered Wi-Fi hotspot that can support 25 users within 600 feet ($100,000).

  • ESU 5 Homework Hotspot by Educational Service Unit 5, to provide Wi-Fi hotspots in parks, ball fields, libraries, and other public areas in Beatrice, Neb. ($50,000).

The Conversation (0)

Why the Internet Needs the InterPlanetary File System

Peer-to-peer file sharing would make the Internet far more efficient

12 min read
Horizontal
An illustration of a series
Carl De Torres
LightBlue

When the COVID-19 pandemic erupted in early 2020, the world made an unprecedented shift to remote work. As a precaution, some Internet providers scaled back service levels temporarily, although that probably wasn’t necessary for countries in Asia, Europe, and North America, which were generally able to cope with the surge in demand caused by people teleworking (and binge-watching Netflix). That’s because most of their networks were overprovisioned, with more capacity than they usually need. But in countries without the same level of investment in network infrastructure, the picture was less rosy: Internet service providers (ISPs) in South Africa and Venezuela, for instance, reported significant strain.

But is overprovisioning the only way to ensure resilience? We don’t think so. To understand the alternative approach we’re championing, though, you first need to recall how the Internet works.

Keep Reading ↓Show less