March Madness at Stanford: Robots Shoot and Dunk

The winning robot sunk 18 three-pointers. Not bad for just being 22 days old

1 min read
March Madness at Stanford: Robots Shoot and Dunk
Photo: Harrison Truong

As college basketball teams around the country began playing their way down to the Final Four, Stanford engineering students had their own March Madness, complete with a cheering crowd and heated competition. This year, for Stanford’s annual battle-of-the-bots, a competition held since 1995 as part of a mechatronics class, went basketball-crazy, with the theme “scoring machines.”

Inspired by this year’s Golden State Warriors players Steph Curry and Klay Thompson, the students set out to build robots capable of shooting balls into baskets as efficiently as those basketball stars.  (Thompson recently set an NBA record of 37 points in a quarter; Curry had a 50-point game.)

Each robot had two minutes, starting from a random position at the end of the miniaturized court, and could score 1, 2, or 3 points for each ball in a basket, depending on the distance to the selected basket from the “ball inbounding zone”.

The 34 teams had 22 days to build their robots. The winning team went for the long shot (literally), and its robot made 18 three-point shots. A close competitor sunk 20 two-point shots, according to Stanford mechanical engineering professor and basketball fan Thomas Kenny, who ran this year’s project.

The students competing included sophomores, juniors, seniors, and graduate students, from mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, computer science, civil engineering, aero/astro, engineering physics, math, philosophy, business, and even fine arts.  Says Kenny: “We find that students from all across the university are seeking some of these skills to enable them to work on the problems that they care about and find the jobs that they want.”

See some of the action in the video above.

Correction to photo credit made 30 March.

The Conversation (0)

The Bionic-Hand Arms Race

The prosthetics industry is too focused on high-tech limbs that are complicated, costly, and often impractical

12 min read
Horizontal
A photograph of a young woman with brown eyes and neck length hair dyed rose gold sits at a white table. In one hand she holds a carbon fiber robotic arm and hand. Her other arm ends near her elbow. Her short sleeve shirt has a pattern on it of illustrated hands.

The author, Britt Young, holding her Ottobock bebionic bionic arm.

Gabriela Hasbun. Makeup: Maria Nguyen for MAC cosmetics; Hair: Joan Laqui for Living Proof
DarkGray

In Jules Verne’s 1865 novel From the Earth to the Moon, members of the fictitious Baltimore Gun Club, all disabled Civil War veterans, restlessly search for a new enemy to conquer. They had spent the war innovating new, deadlier weaponry. By the war’s end, with “not quite one arm between four persons, and exactly two legs between six,” these self-taught amputee-weaponsmiths decide to repurpose their skills toward a new projectile: a rocket ship.

The story of the Baltimore Gun Club propelling themselves to the moon is about the extraordinary masculine power of the veteran, who doesn’t simply “overcome” his disability; he derives power and ambition from it. Their “crutches, wooden legs, artificial arms, steel hooks, caoutchouc [rubber] jaws, silver craniums [and] platinum noses” don’t play leading roles in their personalities—they are merely tools on their bodies. These piecemeal men are unlikely crusaders of invention with an even more unlikely mission. And yet who better to design the next great leap in technology than men remade by technology themselves?

Keep Reading ↓Show less