The August 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

Long-Lived Blue OLED Could Lead to Better Displays

Researchers extend the lifetime of blue phosphorescent OLEDs, bringing them much closer to commercial use

2 min read
Long-Lived Blue OLED Could Lead to Better Displays
Photo: Joseph Xu/Michigan Engineering

Many displays in smartphones and televisions generate red and green light with phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes but use more energy-hungry fluorescent devices for blue. That's because blue PHOLEDs only last for a couple of days. Now researchers have found a way to extend the lifetime of blue PHOLEDs by a factor of 10, bringing them much closer to commercial use.

“We moved that 55 hours to 616 hours, which is a pretty big step,” says Stephen Forrest, head of the Optoelectronic Components and Materials group at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. “It’s still not really long enough, but it’s getting close.”

The pixels in smartphone displays consist of red, green, and blue OLEDs. But while the red and green phosphorescent OLEDs still retain half their brightness after a million hours of use, the blue fades within hours. Chris Giebink, then a Ph.D. student in Forrest’s lab, proposed an explanation back in 2009. He thought that when the OLED was turned on and the holes and electrons were excited to a higher energy level, these excitons would collide with the phosphor’s molecular bonds and dump their extra energy into them, destroying the molecule.

'Researchers have extended the lifetime of blue PHOLEDs by a factor of 10, bringing them much closer to commercial use.'

So instead of trying to build a better phosphorescent molecule, Forrest’s group took an engineering approach to the problem. The semiconductor layer of an OLED is generally doped with phosphors that control the characteristics of the light they emit. Forrest’s team dispersed the dopant material along a gradient, placing different concentrations at different locations. When the phosphor is doped uniformly, Forrest says, the excitons tend to cluster along the edge—increasing the chance of the molecular mayhem of exciton collisions. But with the dopants dispersed along a gradient, collisions are less likely. “We still have the same amount of excitons, but just spread them out spatially,” Forrest says.

Not only does the spreading extend the lifetime of the molecule, it also makes the blue version more efficient than its red and green counterparts, because the excitons are also less likely to collide with each other and waste energy. And Forrest says the results, published in today’s Nature Communications, shows that Giebink was correct about the failure mechanism.

After running at 1000 candela per square centimeter for 616 hours, the team’s blue PHOLED still produces 80 percent of its possible light output. That’s not quite good enough for commercial use, Forrest says, but now that the failure mechanism is understood, it should be possible to improve that by a factor of 100, or even 1000, more than enough to make the device commercially viable.

The Conversation (0)

The First Million-Transistor Chip: the Engineers’ Story

Intel’s i860 RISC chip was a graphics powerhouse

21 min read
Twenty people crowd into a cubicle, the man in the center seated holding a silicon wafer full of chips

Intel's million-transistor chip development team

In San Francisco on Feb. 27, 1989, Intel Corp., Santa Clara, Calif., startled the world of high technology by presenting the first ever 1-million-transistor microprocessor, which was also the company’s first such chip to use a reduced instruction set.

The number of transistors alone marks a huge leap upward: Intel’s previous microprocessor, the 80386, has only 275,000 of them. But this long-deferred move into the booming market in reduced-instruction-set computing (RISC) was more of a shock, in part because it broke with Intel’s tradition of compatibility with earlier processors—and not least because after three well-guarded years in development the chip came as a complete surprise. Now designated the i860, it entered development in 1986 about the same time as the 80486, the yet-to-be-introduced successor to Intel’s highly regarded 80286 and 80386. The two chips have about the same area and use the same 1-micrometer CMOS technology then under development at the company’s systems production and manufacturing plant in Hillsboro, Ore. But with the i860, then code-named the N10, the company planned a revolution.

Keep Reading ↓Show less
{"imageShortcodeIds":[]}