Internet Spam Fighter Weathers Massive Attack

Cybercrooks hit Spamhaus with largest DDoS attack ever recorded

2 min read
Internet Spam Fighter Weathers Massive Attack

Imagine this: a band of criminals imperils a city by putting its police precincts under siege to the point that the police are so busy protecting themselves that they are incapable of doing anything else. Something analogous was just narrowly avoided on the Internet, when anti-spam watchdog Spamhaus came under the largest denial-of-service attack ever recorded. Spamhaus, which helps keep e-mail inboxes free from come-ons hawking male enhancement pills, low-interest loans, and foreclosed properties, was reportedly in the crosshairs of spammers angry about being added to Spamhaus’ blacklists, which make it more challenging to ply their illicit trade.

The attacks, which threatened to knock the not-for-profit Web guardian’s site offline, were a bit of evil genius, using a quirk in the way the Internet works to water Spamhaus’ plants with a fire hose. On 18 March, the attackers began employing a distributed denial of service (DDoS) technique known as DNS reflection. It’s designed to overwhelm a site after the attacker sends simultaneous information requests to thousands of servers with source addresses spoofed so that responses to the DNS queries are all routed to the victim’s servers. In this case, Spamhaus’ servers were being force fed more than 300 gigabits per second, says San Francisco-based CloudFlare.

Spamhaus retained the services of CloudFlare, which specializes in deflecting unwanted Internet traffic away from companies’ servers, to keep its sites from being crushed under the weight of the incoming data deluge. For the sake of comparison, Dan Holden, director of security research at Arbor Networks, told the Wall Street Journal that, “Up until this, the largest attack we had seen was a 100-gigabit attack in 2010 [targeting a U.S. bank] and an 80-gigabit attack in 2012.”

“It is a small miracle that we're still online,” Spamhaus researcher Vincent Hanna told the Journal.

Holden also noted that the attack against Spamhaus caused collateral damage across the Web because some servers along the paths between Spamhaus and the servers that were queried to set off the data tsunami were overwhelmed by the volume of data they had to handle.

But as of this morning, reports are coming in that the attackers—probably frustrated that their best shots failed to put Spamhaus down for the count—have retreated to their corner, probably to plot some more. According to a BBC report, Spamhaus accused Cyberbunker, a Dutch Web-hosting company, of being the brains of the operation. Meanwhile, the BBC reports on the unverified claims of a man who said to be in contact with the attackers. Acting as their mouthpiece, he explained their rationale: "[Spamhaus abuses its] position not to stop spam but to exercise censorship without a court order."

Spamhaus’ Hanna disputed that claim, telling the Journal that, "We have 1.7 billion people who watch over our shoulder. If we start blocking emails that they want, they will obviously stop using us."

The Conversation (0)

Why the Internet Needs the InterPlanetary File System

Peer-to-peer file sharing would make the Internet far more efficient

12 min read
Horizontal
An illustration of a series
Carl De Torres
LightBlue

When the COVID-19 pandemic erupted in early 2020, the world made an unprecedented shift to remote work. As a precaution, some Internet providers scaled back service levels temporarily, although that probably wasn’t necessary for countries in Asia, Europe, and North America, which were generally able to cope with the surge in demand caused by people teleworking (and binge-watching Netflix). That’s because most of their networks were overprovisioned, with more capacity than they usually need. But in countries without the same level of investment in network infrastructure, the picture was less rosy: Internet service providers (ISPs) in South Africa and Venezuela, for instance, reported significant strain.

But is overprovisioning the only way to ensure resilience? We don’t think so. To understand the alternative approach we’re championing, though, you first need to recall how the Internet works.

Keep Reading ↓Show less