Close

Andrew Ng X-Rays the AI Hype

AI pioneer says machine learning may work on test sets, but that’s a long way from real world use

2 min read
2017 photo of computer scientist Andrew Ng  at his office in Palo Alto, Calif.
Photo: Eric Risberg/AP

“Those of us in machine learning are really good at doing well on a test set," says machine learning pioneer Andrew Ng, “but unfortunately deploying a system takes more than doing well on a test set."

Speaking via Zoom in a Q&A session hosted by DeepLearning.AI and Stanford HAI, Ng was responding to a question about why machine learning models trained to make medical decisions that perform at nearly the same level as human experts are not in clinical use. Ng brought up the case in which Stanford researchers were able to quickly develop an algorithm to diagnose pneumonia from chest x-rays—one that, when tested, did better than human radiologists. (Ng, who co-founded Google Brain and Coursera, is currently a professor at Stanford University.)

There are challenges in making a research paper into something useful in a clinical setting, he indicated.

“It turns out," Ng said, “that when we collect data from Stanford Hospital, then we train and test on data from the same hospital, indeed, we can publish papers showing [the algorithms] are comparable to human radiologists in spotting certain conditions."

But, he said, “It turns out [that when] you take that same model, that same AI system, to an older hospital down the street, with an older machine, and the technician uses a slightly different imaging protocol, that data drifts to cause the performance of AI system to degrade significantly. In contrast, any human radiologist can walk down the street to the older hospital and do just fine.

“So even though at a moment in time, on a specific data set, we can show this works, the clinical reality is that these models still need a lot of work to reach production."

This gap between research and practice is not unique to medicine, Ng pointed out, but exists throughout the machine learning world.

“All of AI, not just healthcare, has a proof-of-concept-to-production gap," he says. “The full cycle of a machine learning project is not just modeling. It is finding the right data, deploying it, monitoring it, feeding data back [into the model], showing safety—doing all the things that need to be done [for a model] to be deployed. [That goes] beyond doing well on the test set, which fortunately or unfortunately is what we in machine learning are great at."

The Conversation (0)

The Femtojoule Promise of Analog AI

To cut power by orders of magnitude, do your processing with analog circuits

12 min read
A list of characters and letters in blue, white black and yellow.

Machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) have already penetrated so deeply into our life and work that you might have forgotten what interactions with machines used to be like. We used to ask only for precise quantitative answers to questions conveyed with numeric keypads, spreadsheets, or programming languages: "What is the square root of 10?" "At this rate of interest, what will be my gain over the next five years?"

But in the past 10 years, we've become accustomed to machines that can answer the kind of qualitative, fuzzy questions we'd only ever asked of other people: "Will I like this movie?" "How does traffic look today?" "Was that transaction fraudulent?"

Keep Reading ↓ Show less
{"imageShortcodeIds":[]}