Tech Talk iconTech Talk

TechCrunch50 goes from ho hum to oh wow in 60 minutes flat

2843595359_9aec52c4d4.jpgDay One of TechCrunch50, for me, was a bit of a slog. A few attempts to compete with Facebook (Hangout, Tweegee)â''good luck with that. Some me-toos with a twist, like Yammer, a Twitter for business useâ''not a bad idea, but not groundbreaking. And some tools, like Blueprint for developing code for multi-core processors, and Burt, to help ad agencies design ads for the Internet, videogames, and other digital channels--useful, but niche-y

But midafternoon on day two, things suddenly got interesting, really interesting.

There was a sense that the natives were getting restless when the panel of celebrity tech-savvy judges savaged an introduction by a company called Imindi, much to the surprise, and, for the most part, delight, of the crowd. Not that people like to see a hardworking entrepreneurâ''s idea shot down, but the exchange gave a big boost to the conferenceâ''s energy level. Imindi purports to be the worldâ''s first thought engine; it taps the power of social networks to make creating a detailed mind-map easier. As Imindi explained it, a mind map is, essentially, a list of things you might be thinking about throughout your day with lines connecting them to subcategories in each space, for example, if Iâ''m thinking about my role as a parent, I theoretically might be thinking about education, health, or childrenâ''s nutrition. Iâ''m actually more likely to be trying to figure out how Iâ''m going to squeeze in dinner before leaving for back-to-school night tonight, but thatâ''s another story. Drawing a mind map might take you a long time by yourself, but using the companyâ''s tools, you can simply put in â''parentingâ'' and use other peopleâ''s subcategories to fill in the details. And then by comparing your mind map against the mind map of others, you can find people who think like you.

The obvious question is, â''why?â'' And judge Mark Cuban, founder of, owner of the Dallas Mavericks, and former contestant on Dancing With the Stars, didnâ''t mince words. â''That sounded like the biggest bunch of bullshit Iâ''ve ever heard in my life.â''

The panel did have some advice to turn the company into a success: â''Make it a corporate application, then all you need to do is find one messed up kindred soul at a big corporation.â''

Things calmed down with Me-trics, a company that letâ''s you track various activities like stress level and twitter use and then looks for correlations, seems like it has possibilities, though some panelists were skeptical that people would be willing to enter information over the long term. iCharts, a web-based application that turns data into charts, lets you publish them online, and makes those published charts searchable, also seemed like a useful idea.

Then came Tonchidotâ''s â''Sekai Camera,â'' an iPhone application that uses location data along with information from the deviceâ''s internal accelerometer to â''tagâ'' a scene in real time; the tags appear on the display as overlays as you look through the iPhoneâ''s built-in camera. The presentation brought the crowd to its feet, cheering the enthusiasm of the firmâ''s incomprehensible founder as well as the simple audacity of the idea; Tonchidot simply proposes tagging reality, from large buildings to tiny cell phones in a storeâ''s display case.

Of course, whether or not the application can actually be extended past the prototype stage is an open question. And the judges asked a lot of questions about whether this is a fantasy straight out of Neuromancer or a product that can really be implemented. Panelist Tim Oâ''Reilly, founder of O'Reilly media, said, "Itâ''s a wonderful concept, weâ''ve been fantasizing about it for years, the question is, can you build it?â''

Parried the Tonchidot spokesman: â''Please donâ''t forget imagination.â''

Postbox hit a double, that is, people both liked the idea and at least half the attendees in a straw poll were eager to try the product. Postbox is installable software, not a web-based application, that manages vast amount of email messages from different accounts in what appeared to be an intuitive and simple way, vastly better than anything out there at this point on or off the web. Personally, Iâ''ve been hanging onto Eudora for a long time now, waiting for a reason to move on. Postbox may turn to finally be that reason; at least Iâ''ll give it a try. (I already signed up for the beta, I'll let you know how it goes.)

And then Swype hit a home run. And for more on that, go to my next post.

Photo: Tonchidot's SekaiCamera in action.

Controversial India-U.S. Nuclear Deal Hangs in Balance

A major agreement lifting restrictions on nuclear commerce with India, which Washington and Delhi have been negotiating for years, finally has reached its final hurdle, approval by Congress. The Bush administration has just a couple of weeks to get the U.S. legislatureâ''s assent before adjournment, and may not succeed. The draft agreement has been immensely controversial in both India and the United States, as well as in several other influential countries. Just the thought of it came close to bringing down the Indian government this summer.

The main Indian opposition party, the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, has condemned the agreement as a â''nonproliferation trapâ'' that will prevent the country from realizing its full military potential. The Hindu right has been particularly incensed by reports that Delhi made back-channel promises to never test nuclear weapons again, as a condition of getting a go-ahead for the deal from the Nuclear Suppliers Group , 45 countries that export nuclear technology.

The decision on Sept. 6 by the Nuclear Suppliers Group to support the deal was the next-to-last hurdle that the agreement had to clear before going to Congress. The Arms Control Associationâ''the ordinarily staid and cautious voice of the American arms control establishmentâ''assailed the supplier groupâ''s move as â''a nonproliferation disaster of historic proportionsâ'' supported only by â''Orwellian claims.â'' Londonâ''s Financial Times called the U.S.-India agreement â''a bad dealâ'' that â''makes a mockery of the non-proliferation treatyâ'' and threatens to â''accelerate the nuclear arms race between India and Pakistan.â''

So enraged has been the Arms Control Association, two weeks ago it circulated a report from Platts Nuclear News Flash claiming that Germany was caving into the U.S. position because of crass commercial concerns. (According to the Platts report, Franceâ''a supporter of the U.S.-India dealâ''would let Germanyâ''s Siemens retain a one-third stake in the French nuclear manufacturer Areva if Germany dropped objections to the Indian deal in the suppliers group, which it has been chairing.)

Letâ''s calm down a little and consider the various arguments and counter-arguments analytically.

First, itâ''s true as an Indian expert author argued in Spectrum last year, that Indiaâ''s performance in nuclear energy has consistently lagged behind expectations, and that claims made for the deal by the Indian government should therefore be treated with suspicion. But doesnâ''t this cut both ways? Indiaâ''s past shortcomings have had a good deal with its go-it-alone path; the agreement with the United States, if approved by Congress, will allow the country to import nuclear reactors for the first time since its initial 1974 nuclear weapons test, and tentative plans call for it to buy about eight.

Second, itâ''s true that making it easier for India to import nuclear fuel also will make it easier for the country to obtain fissile material for its atomic bombs; nuclear material is fungible. But isnâ''t the horse already out of the barn? India has gone nuclear and will not give up its arsenal unless every other nuclear weapons state does the sameâ''a position it has consistently adhered to since the 1950s, when its diplomats first starting calling nuclear nonproliferation an attempt to disarm the unarmed, while leaving the armed free to keep arming.

Yes, it sticks in the craw (third) to now allow India to import nuclear technology freely, after it used imported technology, in defiance of pledges made, to get material for its first bomb. But is this â''rewardingâ'' India, or just acknowledging that something has changed that canâ''t be unchanged? And (fourth) how much, really, will the agreement further heat up an arms race between India and Pakistan thatâ''s already very heated?

Maybe this is the really decisive point: for sure, the special treatment India gets in the deal is bound to enrage Pakistanis, whose ongoing assistance is crucial to hunting down Al Qaedaâ''s leaders, ending the global war on terror, and bringing U.S. troops home. Given Pakistanâ''s extreme instability, is it really a good idea to feed flames there, without truly compelling cause?

Just for the sake of a few reactor sales, do we want to worsen the odds of an Islamist government coming to power in nuclear-armed Pakistan?


CERN accelerator

Find the full-size image at Slashdot

The LHC successfully circulated protons around the accelerator ring earlier this morning. (it was 9 am European time, so the Fermilab people were having a "pajama party" in their remote control center in Battavia, Illinois).

The live webcast from the LHC control rooms still going on. Check it out!

But an experimental physicist on the project who just got back from CERN told me that the "real" collisions won't commence until October. "This is when the real fun will start!" he said.

Electric Supergrids Gaining Traction

Incomplete and constrained transmission grids pose a serious impediment to the use of renewable energy sources such as wind power. Proposals launched over the past week show that support for more lines is going mainstream.

Last week none other than Greenpeace called for an underwater power grid criss-crossing the North Sea to accelerate the installation of dozens of new offshore wind farms. In "A North Sea Electricity Grid [R]Evolution", Greenpeace Belgium and Brussels-based environmental consulting firm 3E map out an offshore network composed of 6,200 kilometers of undersea lines. According to their models, this grid extension could add 68 gigawatts of wind power capacity by 2020 -- enough to meet 13% of net power demand of seven North Sea countries.

Yesterday the Washington, D.C.-based Council on Competitiveness, an alliance of corporate CEOs, university presidents and labor leaders, lent its support to grid expansion, urging the next U.S. president to create a "national transmission superhighway." The proposal is part of a broader "100-Day Energy Action Plan". The Council would empower the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to determine when and where expanded transmission capacity is needed, overriding state authorities. "As with the interstate highway system and the information superhighway, our leaders must knit together the current patchwork of regulations and oversight into a seamlessly connected electrical power highway," states the plan.

Proposals that need to be debated.

The North Sea Grid a la Greenpeace:


A $100 Billion Plan to Create 2 Million Green Jobs

A report released today (Sept. 9) by John Podestaâ''s Center for American Progress lays out a plan that could create 2 million new jobs in two years by spending $100 billion to â''jumpstartâ'' a clean energy economy. The report, written by economist Robert Pollin and colleagues at the University of Massachusettsâ''s Political Economy Research Institute, would focus investments on energy-efficient building, mass transportation, smart electrical grids, wind and solar, and advanced biofuels. Funds could come from the proceeds of auctioned carbon emission credits and could be allocated in the form of tax credits, direct government spending, and loan guarantees.

Lame Battery Equals Great Bike Ride

Thanks to the good folks at Garmin, who had the foresight to equip their $650 Edge 705 cycling computer with what must be the worst rechargeable battery they could find, today I had a wonderful early autumn ride through the prairie-grass laden fields of suburban Minneapolis. I was unconcerned about my heart rate, my pedaling cadence, my location, elevation or speed. The distance I traveled mattered not a whit. And time just didn't matter.

More LHC!

In addition to being the biggest particle physics experiment in history, the Large Hadron Collider will likely also soon win the prize for most random collection of media attempting to describe it. The gamut is huge: from the sublime to the mundane, from education to infotainment, and finally to the outright wackadoo, the experiment is so complicated that everyone is having a crack at explaining it to his or her target demographic. (Though the hip-hop-particle-physicist demographic is likely quite small, I would argue that it is also the most awesome.)

Now, a nascent comic book from PhD comics (via Boingboing). The LHC is the kind of thing the cliche "a picture is worth a thousand words" was invented for.


LHC Countdown: T minus one


My God, it's full of stars.

Tonight at 8 pm on the History Channel, Johns Hopkins University theoretical physicist David Kaplan hosts a program that will explain the significance of the Large Hadron Collider, which is the largest particle physics experiment in history and after twenty-some years of design and construction is finally ready to be fired up tomorrow. The show is called "The Next Big Bang."

Later today I'll also be posting a video about the LHC (albeit with considerably lower production values and a less hyperbolic title). I was at CERN in July and got a chance to see parts of the 27-kilometer accelerator ring, 100 meters underground, a couple of days before they finished construction and closed it up. After the experiments get going in the tunnels, the radiation will be too intense to allow anyone in.

The picture above shows the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS), one of four equidistant experimental particle detectors that are strung around the accelerator ring like Cathedral-sized beads. CMS is on the French side; its fraternal twin, ATLAS, is on the Swiss side. The LHC is so big that it spans the border of the two countries.

Follow IEEE Spectrum on Twitter

Well, better late than never. Follow IEEE Spectrum on Twitter for updates from the Web site and reports from the field, like the sweet tweets from senior editor Tekla Perry as she ogles new goodies at Tech Crunch 50 this week.

FDA Holds Public Hearings on Nanotechnology

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has decided to take on the daunting task of figuring out how the size of a material (versus its chemical composition) affects its toxicity.

In keeping with the theme of pithy little size innuendos like â''size mattersâ'', this is a big nut to crack. A lot of work, research, development of new tools, creating of new measurement standards, and lots of money and time will be required to sort it out.

But instead of â''letâ''s roll up our sleeves and get to workâ'' we get â''letâ''s have a public meeting.â''

There must be some real or imagined benefit to engaging in this kind of public theater, but I imagine whatever it is it will not likely bring us any closer to determining how the size of particles imparts its level of toxicity.

The assumption behind these types of meetings is to foster an environment of openness and transparency with the general public.

But I canâ''t help but think that TNTLog has it about right when it laments about public acceptance of technologies whether â''any kind of education, or even twenty years in a Soviet Gulag would change such entrenched views?â''


Tech Talk

IEEE Spectrum’s general technology blog, featuring news, analysis, and opinions about engineering, consumer electronics, and technology and society, from the editorial staff and freelance contributors.

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up for the Tech Alert newsletter and receive ground-breaking technology and science news from IEEE Spectrum every Thursday.

Load More