The July 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

Women Less Likely To Be Shown Ads for High-Paying Jobs

Study shows gender discrimination in targeted advertisements, cause unknown

2 min read
A woman between two men.
Photo: Getty Images

Men are more likely to be shown online ads for high-paying executive jobs than women, according to Carnegie Mellon University researchers. The finding is a result of experiments with simulated user profiles to analyze targeted advertisements served by Google’s DoubleClick ad network on third-party websites.

The study shows that gender discrimination in the world of targeted ads is real. But the researchers don’t know who or what is responsible, Anupam Datta, associate professor of electrical and computer engineering said in a press release. Datta and his colleagues presented their results at the Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposiumin Philadelphia last week.

The researchers have developed a tool called AdFisher. The tool creates hundreds of simulated users and then changes their preferences or online behavior so that the researchers can study the impact of those changes, such as a change in ads that the users receive.

To study the effect of gender, the CMU team created 1,000 virutal users—half female and the other half male—and had them visit 100 top employment sites. The male profiles were much more likely to be shown ads for a career coaching service for executive positions paying over $200,000. The Google ad network showed this ad to the male users more than 1800 times, but only about 300 times to women.

It’s hard to pinpoint the source of the discrimination, the researchers say. Google’s ad targeting system is complex, basing ads on factors such as personal information and browsing history. In the study, though, the user profiles were fresh and behaved the same way, so the only differentiating factor was gender.

It could be that advertisers choose to target the audience they want to reach. Or it could be unintended results of machine learning algorithms that drive the ad recommendation engines. But those algorithms are programmed by humans and are programmed to learn from user behavior. So they could be reflecting real-world prejudices.

Google’s had a string of embarrassing moments with its algorithms. From The Verge:

Earlier this month, for example, Google was forced to apologize after its new Photos app tagged pictuers of black people as gorillas. And in April, researchers found that the results for a Google image search for the term "CEO" were only 11 percent female, a figure that compares poorly to real life stats, with female executives making up 27 percent of US CEOs.

Much more sleuthing of these online targeting systems is clearly required before researchers can draw any big conclusion.

Datta said in a press release that there’s no evidence that Google is doing anything illegal or that it violates its own policies. He is now working with Microsoft Research to get a detailed peek inside Microsoft’s ad ecosystem. 

The Conversation (0)

How the FCC Settles Radio-Spectrum Turf Wars

Remember the 5G-airport controversy? Here’s how such disputes play out

11 min read
This photo shows a man in the basket of a cherry picker working on an antenna as an airliner passes overhead.

The airline and cellular-phone industries have been at loggerheads over the possibility that 5G transmissions from antennas such as this one, located at Los Angeles International Airport, could interfere with the radar altimeters used in aircraft.

Patrick T. Fallon/AFP/Getty Images

You’ve no doubt seen the scary headlines: Will 5G Cause Planes to Crash? They appeared late last year, after the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration warned that new 5G services from AT&T and Verizon might interfere with the radar altimeters that airplane pilots rely on to land safely. Not true, said AT&T and Verizon, with the backing of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, which had authorized 5G. The altimeters are safe, they maintained. Air travelers didn’t know what to believe.

Another recent FCC decision had also created a controversy about public safety: okaying Wi-Fi devices in a 6-gigahertz frequency band long used by point-to-point microwave systems to carry safety-critical data. The microwave operators predicted that the Wi-Fi devices would disrupt their systems; the Wi-Fi interests insisted they would not. (As an attorney, I represented a microwave-industry group in the ensuing legal dispute.)

Keep Reading ↓Show less