The original 1982 ItalDesign Capsula concept car, a strange dark grey car
The original 1982 ItalDesign Capsula concept
Photo: Italdesign

The only thing edgier than a flying robocar is half a flying robocar. That’s the concept that Italdesign and Airbus are to unveil this week at the Geneva Auto Show.

Yes, yes, you’re thinking that now you’ve seen everything. Except that you haven’t seen it yet. As for us here at IEEE Spectrum, we’ll believe it when we see it. 

And, no, this flying car has nothing to do with that other Airbus flying-vehicle project, the Vahana autonomous air taxi. That’s the one being developed by A3, the airplane manufacturer’s Silicon Valley subsidiary. As our recent posts attest, we aren’t too enthralled with Vahana, nor with the Ehang air taxi that’s being readied for use in Dubai.

The Italdesign-Airbus concept would assign the flying job not to the vehicle itself but to a large drone—one measuring some 5 meters by 5 meters, according toAutomotive News. When you’re mired in traffic, you’d just call on that pterodactyl, which would come and swoop down, grab the upper half of the robocar and waft it and you away. Only the upper half—the passenger cab—gets lifted: the bottom half—the drivetrain and wheels—stays put, inching its way through traffic, and eventually finding its way home.

This concept is just another application of the layer-cake design of the Capsula, a 1982 thought experiment by Italdesign. The bottom layer carries the automotive guts—chassis, engine, brakes, wheels, even the spare wheel—leaving space on top for different “capsules”. Depending on the capsule you choose, you could get a sedan, light truck, police car, ambulance, or any other vehicle.

And to what destination, pray tell, would the big drone carry you? Maybe you’d choose from among many spare bottom halves predeployed all around your city. Then the drone drops you and the upper layer onto one. Presto! You’re a car again.

And if your newly assembled layer cake of a car gets stuck in traffic, you could call on the drone to rescue you yet again. So could all the other people, until at last the road network got so chockablock with aimlessly moving bottom halves that there’d be no choice but to get airborne and stay that way.

The Conversation (0)

We Need More Than Just Electric Vehicles

To decarbonize road transport we need to complement EVs with bikes, rail, city planning, and alternative energy

11 min read
A worker works on the frame of a car on an assembly line.

China has more EVs than any other country—but it also gets most of its electricity from coal.

VCG/Getty Images

EVs have finally come of age. The total cost of purchasing and driving one—the cost of ownership—has fallen nearly to parity with a typical gasoline-fueled car. Scientists and engineers have extended the range of EVs by cramming ever more energy into their batteries, and vehicle-charging networks have expanded in many countries. In the United States, for example, there are more than 49,000 public charging stations, and it is now possible to drive an EV from New York to California using public charging networks.

With all this, consumers and policymakers alike are hopeful that society will soon greatly reduce its carbon emissions by replacing today’s cars with electric vehicles. Indeed, adopting electric vehicles will go a long way in helping to improve environmental outcomes. But EVs come with important weaknesses, and so people shouldn’t count on them alone to do the job, even for the transportation sector.

Keep Reading ↓Show less