Study: Copper Supports Ultrafast Broadband, to a Point

Standard twisted pair cables can handle frequencies up to 5 gigahertz—but no higher

2 min read
A pair of twisted copper cables with green and yellow insulation
iStockphoto

Widely used twisted pair cables first invented by Alexander Graham Bell in 1881 could support ultrafast broadband where fiber-optic networks cannot, although they will inevitably hit a speed limit, a new study finds.

Fiber optic cables are replacing copper wires to help deliver high-speed broadband access. However, such upgrades can prove expensive in both densely populated cities and sparsely populated rural areas, as well as underdeveloped and developing countries, limiting their widespread deployment.

“Moving to fiber optics is an inevitable process for a future-proof network,” says study lead author Ergin Dinc, now a senior R&D engineer at Isotropic Systems in England. “However, replacing all the copper cables is a very costly and time-consuming operation. In places where this replacement is not practical, alternative ways to improve Internet speeds are required.”

In the new study, Dinc and his colleagues at the University of Cambridge, in England, investigated twisted pairs, which are made up of a pair of insulated copper wires that are twisted together to help protect them against electromagnetic interference. Twisted pairs remain commonplace in telephone and data networks.

Available digital subscriber line (DSL) technologies such as G.fast operate in the frequency spectrum up to 212 megahertz and enable data rates up to 2 gigabits per second, and the emerging DSL technology aims to extend the frequency spectrum up to 848 megahertz and targets data rates up to 10 Gb/s. In the new study, the scientists explored the upper limits of twisted pair operations at frequencies of more than 1 gigahertz using a device known as a microstrip balun.

A microstrip is an electrical transmission line used to convey microwave-frequency signals that consists of a conductor separated from a grounded plane by a dielectric layer. A balun is a device that can transform a balanced signal to an unbalanced one, or vice versa. The experiments with the device soldered the individual wires of a twisted pair to the top and bottom of the microstrip balun. The researchers note their design may find use in future DSL networks to extend the frequency spectrum of existing systems.

The researchers found standard twisted pairs could support a bandwidth of up to 5 GHz, and they could move this upper bound to even higher frequencies by using shorter twist lengths. Still, above 5 GHz, twisted pairs start radiating like antennas and cannot transmit more data.

“Copper cables can transmit more data, but it is nowhere near what fiber-optic cables can achieve,” Dinc says. “Therefore, replacing fiber-optic cables is a necessity, but while doing this, we can also improve the copper network to increase user data rates while this transition is happening.”

The scientists detailed their findings online 26 April in the journal Nature Communications.

The Conversation (2)
Evariste Galois 10 May, 2022

I didn't see any distances mentioned. I assume the cable length is limited, much more so than for fiber. I also didn't understand the point about the twist length--the twist length of an existing (buried) twisted pair can't be altered, so isn't this value fixed?

Luca Brockschmidt 09 May, 2022
INDV

You write "The researchers found standard twisted pairs could support a bandwidth of up to 5 GHz". That would indeed be incredible. However, the researchers mention in their abstract that twisted pair cables support *carrier frequencies* up to 5 GHz.

The Cellular Industry’s Clash Over the Movement to Remake Networks

The wireless industry is divided on Open RAN’s goal to make network components interoperable

13 min read
Photo: George Frey/AFP/Getty Images
DarkBlue2

We've all been told that 5G wireless is going to deliver amazing capabilities and services. But it won't come cheap. When all is said and done, 5G will cost almost US $1 trillion to deploy over the next half decade. That enormous expense will be borne mostly by network operators, companies like AT&T, China Mobile, Deutsche Telekom, Vodafone, and dozens more around the world that provide cellular service to their customers. Facing such an immense cost, these operators asked a very reasonable question: How can we make this cheaper and more flexible?

Their answer: Make it possible to mix and match network components from different companies, with the goal of fostering more competition and driving down prices. At the same time, they sparked a schism within the industry over how wireless networks should be built. Their opponents—and sometimes begrudging partners—are the handful of telecom-equipment vendors capable of providing the hardware the network operators have been buying and deploying for years.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less