T-Mobile’s 5G Plan Encompasses Far More Than Millimeter Waves

T-Mobile sees low- and mid-band frequencies as equally vital for the next generation wireless network

2 min read
T-Mobile App shown on a phone
Photo: Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Karri Kuoppamaki began his talk on Wednesday at the Brooklyn 5G Summit by discussing T-Mobile’s LTE network, an apparent anachronism. Or, as he put it, “Why am I talking about LTE? This isn’t the Brooklyn LTE Summit.”

But Kouppamaki, the Vice President of Radio Network Technology Development and Strategy for T-Mobile, had a good reason to spend the first portion of his talk discussing the current generation of wireless tech: Despite the radical departures 5G promises for network infrastructure and data rates, it will still be built on existing networks.

“People associate millimeter waves with 5G,” Kuoppamaki said, “And rightly so, it’s untapped frequencies.” The data rates offered by the 28 GHz band are an exciting opportunity, but he went on to say that he, and T-Mobile, see 5G’s potential extending far beyond this new frontier of spectrum.

T-Mobile plans to develop a 5G network across the entire spectrum—not just at the high-frequency millimeter wave band. One of the big problems for millimeter waves is their short propagation distance. They’ll be great for dense urban areas, where lower frequencies inevitably get blocked by all the obstacles anyway. But to deliver 5G across the United States, Kouppamaki argues that just as much attention must be given to mid- and low-band frequencies.

For example, a 70 MHz range in the 600 MHz band were recently auctioned off the by US government. An extremely low band, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr nonetheless referred to it as spectrum for 5G. Kuoppamaki says that was a good insight—those low-band frequencies will be needed for long-range signal propagation.

Kuoppamaki sees an entire ecosystem of spectrum servicing 5G. The low bands like the 600 MHz range will service nationwide services, while mid-band frequencies will assist high-band millimeter waves in towns and dense cities. And it doesn’t necessarily have to end there. Kuoppamaki mentioned using the 60 GHz band. “We can figure out what to do with that,” he said, “It’s a different animal.” Even so, it might have applications for in-building networks or localized outdoor networks, despite its poor distance propagation.

Kuoppamaki believes this holistic approach to 5G is the right way to go. To that end, T-Mobile is already deploying the infrastructure for a nationwide 600 MHz network. When asked whether customers would be dissatisfied with potentially lower data rates with lower bands, Kuoppamaki was undaunted, saying 5G developments would improve the entire spectrum. “Whatever we do with LTE, 5G will always be incremental to that.”

The Conversation (0)

The Cellular Industry’s Clash Over the Movement to Remake Networks

The wireless industry is divided on Open RAN’s goal to make network components interoperable

13 min read
Photo: George Frey/AFP/Getty Images

We've all been told that 5G wireless is going to deliver amazing capabilities and services. But it won't come cheap. When all is said and done, 5G will cost almost US $1 trillion to deploy over the next half decade. That enormous expense will be borne mostly by network operators, companies like AT&T, China Mobile, Deutsche Telekom, Vodafone, and dozens more around the world that provide cellular service to their customers. Facing such an immense cost, these operators asked a very reasonable question: How can we make this cheaper and more flexible?

Their answer: Make it possible to mix and match network components from different companies, with the goal of fostering more competition and driving down prices. At the same time, they sparked a schism within the industry over how wireless networks should be built. Their opponents—and sometimes begrudging partners—are the handful of telecom-equipment vendors capable of providing the hardware the network operators have been buying and deploying for years.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less