The Price Is Wrong

Apex Digital may have shaved the margins too thin on its $30 DVD player

3 min read
Illustration depicting dissection of an Apex AD2600.
Illustration: Bryan Christie

Not long ago, Apex Digital Inc., a California upstart maker of ultracheap DVD players, televisions, and other consumer electronics, was hailed as an emerging manufacturing paragon. Its Chinese-American chairman, David Ji, was chosen by Time magazine as one of 15 “global influentials” of 2002. And last year, after the company, then just five years old, had raked in a breathtaking US $1 billion in annual sales, The New York Times columnist Rob Walker enthused: “The more people buy Apex players (and jostle one another at stores to get at them), the more it seems downright unthrifty to buy anything else.”

Then a giant skeleton emerged from Apex’s closet. On 24 October, authorities from the province of Sichuan in China detained Ji on fraud charges while he was on a business trip there. Two months later, Sichuan Changhong Electric Co., in Minyang City, one of Apex’s major suppliers, disclosed that it was writing off $310 million of the $467.5 million that Sichuan Changhong said it was owed by Apex. Weeks earlier, according to published reports, Sichuan Changhong had filed suit in Los Angeles Superior Court accusing Apex, which is based in Ontario, Calif., of using bad checks to pay for hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of television sets. IEEE Spectrum’s efforts to reach Apex officials were unsuccessful.

In early January, Apex fired its first salvo. It issued statements accusing Sichuan Changhong of lying about Apex’s payments and conspiring with provincial officials to detain Ji and to force him to surrender Apex’s financial records. As of mid-January, Ji was still in China under house arrest and all parties to the dispute had communicated with the press only through prepared statements.

It may be months before all the details in the dispute are sorted out. But before its fateful venture into merchandizing TVs, Apex had dominated the U.S. DVD player market with its low-price, high-volume selling strategy. Nevertheless, an analysis by Spectrum shows that Apex must have found it difficult indeed to wring significant profits out of its DVD players, which were sometimes sold for as little as $25 through such retailers as Wal-Mart, Kmart, and Circuit City Stores. To shed some light on Apex’s margins as a consumer electronics maker, Spectrum asked Chipworks Inc., a technology research company in Ottawa, to reverse-engineer an Apex DVD player for us.

At the height of its success, between November 2003 and October 2004, Apex had 11 percent of the $2.5 billion U.S. market for DVD players, according to NPD Group, in Port Washington, N.Y., which tracks retail sales of consumer products. That share ranked Apex just behind technology leader Sony Corp., Tokyo, whose DVD players typically go for $80 and up.

Apex was not the first to conceive of the cut-rate consumer electronics model, but it certainly took the formula to new lows. Apex “is basically a marketing company with a few smart people who write specifications for a product, which is then built by contractors,” says Shyam Nagrani, a principal analyst, consumer products, for market researcher iSuppli Corp., in El Segundo, Calif.

Like other discount producers, Apex spends nothing on R and D and as little as possible on manufacturing (although just how little is, of course, the question of the moment). It buys components and subsystems in huge quantities. Assembly is carried out in the cheapest place possible, and these days, for DVD players, that generally means China, often in a factory in Zhenjiang, in the eastern province of Jiangsu. Apex bought 60 percent of the controlling interest of this state-owned manufacturing facility in 2001, according to an article in the Toronto newspaper The Globe and Mail. Most workers there are paid 450 yuan, or about US $55, a month.

Japanese companies have shifted just about all their manufacturing of DVD players to China, points out Nagrani, adding that last year, 90 to 95 percent of all DVD players were produced there. But established Japanese brands like Sony and Panasonic are built by companies that make their own chips and use better-quality parts. And, of course, their prices—at least two to three times as much as Apex’s—reflect that fact.

For the Spectrum analysis, Chipworks dissected an Apex AD2600, a single-disc player with progressive scan, a feature found on computer displays that smooths the images drawn on a TV screen, improving video quality. Although such a unit would usually sell for about $30, some retailers have offered a player such as the AD2600 for $25 as a “loss leader,” simply to get consumers into the store.

Nagrani estimates that Apex’s cost of materials is $25, tops. Assembly is extra. He adds that a retailer might want to make a profit of around $4 to $5 at a minimum. So even at $30 retail, it’s hard to see Apex making any appreciable money on its lines of low-end DVD players. And if similar economics apply to its other product lines, it’s no wonder that Apex may have found it difficult to meet its obligations.

The Conversation (0)

Q&A With Co-Creator of the 6502 Processor

Bill Mensch on the microprocessor that powered the Atari 2600 and Commodore 64

5 min read
Bill Mensch

Few people have seen their handiwork influence the world more than Bill Mensch. He helped create the legendary 8-bit 6502 microprocessor, launched in 1975, which was the heart of groundbreaking systems including the Atari 2600, Apple II, and Commodore 64. Mensch also created the VIA 65C22 input/output chip—noted for its rich features and which was crucial to the 6502's overall popularity—and the second-generation 65C816, a 16-bit processor that powered machines such as the Apple IIGS, and the Super Nintendo console.

Many of the 65x series of chips are still in production. The processors and their variants are used as microcontrollers in commercial products, and they remain popular among hobbyists who build home-brewed computers. The surge of interest in retrocomputing has led to folks once again swapping tips on how to write polished games using the 6502 assembly code, with new titles being released for the Atari, BBC Micro, and other machines.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less

Spot’s 3.0 Update Adds Increased Autonomy, New Door Tricks

Boston Dynamics' Spot can now handle push-bar doors and dynamically replan in complex environments

5 min read
Boston Dynamics

While Boston Dynamics' Atlas humanoid spends its time learning how to dance and do parkour, the company's Spot quadruped is quietly getting much better at doing useful, valuable tasks in commercial environments. Solving tasks like dynamic path planning and door manipulation in a way that's robust enough that someone can buy your robot and not regret it is, I would argue, just as difficult (if not more difficult) as getting a robot to do a backflip.

With a short blog post today, Boston Dynamics is announcing Spot Release 3.0, representing more than a year of software improvements over Release 2.0 that we covered back in May of 2020. The highlights of Release 3.0 include autonomous dynamic replanning, cloud integration, some clever camera tricks, and a new ability to handle push-bar doors, and earlier today, we spoke with Spot Chief Engineer at Boston Dynamics Zachary Jackowski to learn more about what Spot's been up to.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less

Design of Safety Critical Devices - Resolve the Conflict: reduce time to market and development costs while optimizing reliability & safety. exida's OEMx™ takes you from requirements to architecture review to detailed H/W and S/W design (FMEA to FMEDA) to accurate safety & reliability predictions quicker and at reduced cost.


Keep Reading ↓ Show less

Trending Stories

The most-read stories on IEEE Spectrum right now