The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

The NPfIT Is Dead!! Long Live The Summary Care Record!!

Original UK National Electronic Healthcare Record System Vision Officially Declared "No Longer Possible"

2 min read
The NPfIT Is Dead!! Long Live The Summary Care Record!!

The UK's National Health Service's (NHS) admitted this week in a letter to London-area acute hospital trust executives that not all their hospitals will be getting a national, integrated electronic health record (EHR) system (called the National Programme for IT (NPfIT) aka Connecting for Health) as promised, the Financial Times of London says in a story today.

Quoting from a letter from Ruth Carnall, the NHS chief executive of the London strategic health authority to London hospital trust executives, she writes that the NHS will "it will no longer be possible to provide the comprehensive [EHR] solution that was anticipated in 2003." Instead, only about half of the 32 London acute hospital trusts will be receiving a fully integrated EHR system.

What about the London hospitals left out? The FT says,

"In place of a dedicated means of sharing records across hospitals, and between hospitals and primary care - a key goal of the programme - London will have to rely on the national summary care record, Ms Carnall says. However, this contains little other than allergies and current medication, and does not yet carry referral or discharge information."

In addition, London's ambulance service and GP offices won't be getting full EHR systems either, says the FT.

I suspect that few if any hospitals (or GPs) outside of London will be receiving EHR systems either, given that there has been major problems in making that work as well.

The NHS decision to drastically reduce its EHR commitment in London and go with the controversial summary care record (SCR) approach instead goes a long way towards explaining why the government has been pushing so hard to get millions of patient records uploaded into the SCR database before a report that it had commissioned discussing possible security, privacy and other issues was released.

So after 7 plus years of effort, billions of pounds spent, and loads of government hype, what most NHS patients and doctors likely will end up getting is a glorified personal health record that may or may be secure and private, and which may or may not improve their health care.

I wonder if the NPfIT business case will now be updated to reflect this new reality.

The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
Vertical
A plate of spaghetti made from code
Shira Inbar
DarkBlue1

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less
{"imageShortcodeIds":["31996907"]}