The Mars Challenge

Human exploration of the red planet will inspire new generations of engineers

3 min read
President Kennedy at his 1961 speech launching the Apollo program.
Photo: NASA

This is part of IEEE Spectrum’s Special Report: Why Mars? Why Now?

photo of President Kennedy Moon Shot: President Kennedy’s 1961 speech launching the Apollo program helped set in motion a wave of technological advancement. Photo: NASA

This past autumn, I met with all 1700 first-year engineering students at Purdue University. I asked them what their generation’s greatest technological legacy might be. Repeatedly, they told me: sending people to Mars.

I was surprised, but I shouldn’t have been. Human achievement takes countless forms, and none has proved more revolutionary than space exploration. It energizes engineering, resuscitates research, and galvanizes new generations. After all, fearless optimism and an accompanying willingness to do what’s hard are what set great engineers apart. As U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower once said, engineers “build not merely for the needs of men but for their dreams as well.”

Ironically, it wasn’t dreams but rather fear that triggered the race to space. The October 1957 launch of Sputnik set in motion a wave of technological advancement unsurpassed in history, the ripples of which are still being felt today. For more than a decade, policy-makers and the public genuinely believed that the future depended on engineers and scientists and that education would have to inspire young people to pursue those careers.

In the United States, Congress provided loans for college students and funded improvements in science, mathematics, and foreign-language instruction at elementary and secondary schools. In Europe, NATO set up a science committee, which proposed to launch “a satellite for peaceful outer space research…and circling the earth by 1960.”

Glorious things came out of that era. On 25 May 1961, President John F. Kennedy delivered his legendary man-on-the-moon speech, and eight years later, Apollo 11 made good on it. It was one of the United States’ finest hours, and for a time, at least, virtually anything seemed possible. And so the impact continued to reverberate through the rest of the 20th century and on into this one, albeit as an increasingly weakened echo.

Nevertheless, innovation and technology directly or indirectly inspired by the space race still shape the way we live and work. And I’m not talking about Tang or the Space Pen: Satellite communications, satellite navigation, photovoltaics, fault-tolerant computing, and countless specialty materials and biomedical sensors all came out of the space program.

The International Space Station demonstrated that after the Cold War, industrialized nations could work together in space without requiring the motivation of fear or nationalism. That’s important, because fear and nationalism can’t get us to Mars. It’s too big an undertaking for any one country, and the commitment will have to persist despite changes in world politics. It’s an undertaking on a scale that will require many of the world’s best minds.

Yet developed nations are seeing far too many of their best and brightest shunning engineering as a career. Countless panels and study groups have lamented the problem and proposed solutions. Common to all these solutions is the conviction that engineering once again needs to inspire—that we need to harness the power of dreams with projects like a human mission to Mars.

Here at Purdue, I get to see some of those dreams made real. Hundreds of our engineers now work in the aerospace industry, among them William H. Gerstenmaier, who directs NASA’s human exploration program. And 22 Purdue graduates have become astronauts, including Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon, and Eugene Cernan, the last—or as he would say, “the most recent.”

Cernan, who earned a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Purdue in 1956, finds my students’ vision of reaching for the Red Planet not at all far-fetched. “As long as we give them the tools, as long as we give them the education and the inspiration, there’s no question in my mind that they will take us to Mars,” he says. “Where it’s going to lead, who knows? But I can tell you this with absolute certainty: It’s going to happen.”

For more articles, go to Special Report: Why Mars? Why Now?

About the Authors

LEAH H. JAMIESON is the John A. Edwardson Dean of Engineering at Purdue University, in West Lafayette, Ind. She served as president of IEEE in 2007.  JOHN NORBERG, a senior writer at Purdue, is author of Wings of Their Dreams: Purdue in Flight (Purdue University Press, 2003).

The Conversation (0)

How Can We Get​ Blockchains to Talk to Each Other?

The field is fragmented, but common protocols are on the way

4 min read
An artists impression of two blockchain blocks trying to communicate with each other.
iStockPhoto

This article is part of our exclusive IEEE Journal Watch series in partnership with IEEE Xplore.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less

Clever Compression of Some Neural Nets Improves Performance

MIT researchers find an efficient way to prune speech-recognition AIs while still boosting accuracy

3 min read
Icon based illustration showing an AI language processing cycle.
iStockPhoto

As neural networks grow larger, they become more powerful, but also more power-hungry, gobbling electricity, time, and computer memory. Researchers have explored ways to lighten the load, especially for deployment on mobile devices. One compression method is called pruning—deleting the weakest links. New research proposes a novel way to prune speech-recognition models, making the pruning process more efficient while also rendering the compressed model more accurate.

The researchers addressed speech recognition for relatively uncommon languages. To learn speech recognition using only supervised learning, software requires a lot of existing audio-text pairings, which are in short supply for some languages. A popular method called self-supervised learning gets around the problem. In self-supervised learning, a model finds patterns in data without any labels—such as “dog” on a dog image. Artificial intelligence can then build on these patterns and learn more focused tasks using supervised learning on minimal data, a process called fine-tuning.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less

Fundamentals of radome and bumper measurements using the R&S QAR

This whitepaper examines how the R&S QAR quality automotive radome tester can help

1 min read

Due to design challenges, radar sensors are usually hidden behind bumpers or emblems, which can influence how well the radar sensor can interpret the outgoing and incoming data. To test radome and bumper influence on radar sensors, this whitepaper examines how the R&S®QAR quality automotive radome tester can help. Register now and download our free whitepaper.