The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

The Mac Is Selling Like Never Before Thanks to the M1 Chip

Apple’s homegrown chip fulfills Steve Jobs’s “whole widget” design philosophy

3 min read
Illustration of a rainbow and Apple M1 chip
Harry Campbell

The Mac is enjoying a year that any PC maker would envy. It kicked off 2021 by doubling the number of shipments compared with the same period last year, according to the International Data Corp. Apple's CEO, Tim Cook, said in April that over half of all Macs sold are now powered by Apple Silicon, the company's new, in-house line of processors. A successor to the first chip, which will likely be called M1X or M2, is likely to be announced by the time you read this.

That's a shocking success. If you'd told me that just a year ago, I would have said you were nuts.

Critics (like me) love Macs, but consumers often balk at their cost. Before Apple Silicon, affordable Macs were saddled with slow processors, while premium models struggled to justify sky-high prices. This came to a head in Apple's infamous MacBook Pro 15 with the Intel Core i9 processor. Despite a price tag that topped US $2,399, the machine ran so hot and performed so poorly that Apple had to patch the firmware to fix the problem. Debacles like this left Apple eager to switch to its own silicon.

The latest iMac, starting at a tolerable $1,299, is a summary of what M1 means for Mac design. It's a gorgeous departure from the prior iMac, a third as thick yet more powerful, trading the old monochrome chassis for a colorful slate. It's everything most people need in one package, and it's only the tip of the iceberg. The entire Mac line will be reimagined for Apple Silicon by the end of 2022.

Steve Jobs's “whole widget" design philosophy, focused on the end user's experience, was perfected with the iPhone, and now it has come full circle, to the Mac.

This is a threat to the PC. Wintel PCs—those running the Windows operating system on Intel x86 processors—have dominated the PC market since Intel's defeat of IBM's PowerPC architecture in the 1990s. Intel took advantage with a vast processor line that left consumers scratching their heads. Few questions are more likely to earn a blank stare than “What's the difference between Intel's U-Series and H-Series?"

Buying a new M1-powered iMac (or any M1 Mac), by contrast, is as simple as buying an iPhone. It's an extension of Steve Jobs's “whole widget" design philosophy, focused on the end user's experience instead of specifications. The idea was perfected with the iPhone, and now it has come full circle, to the Mac.

Mac enthusiasts are eager to see Apple flex its new “M" muscles with faster chips that crush Intel's best. Apple is expected to release a more powerful chip this year alongside a graphics upgrade of its own design. But pricing, not performance, is where Apple can truly hammer the PC.

“I think they have room to lower their prices on M1 designs when M2 comes in," says Patrick Moorhead, founder and principal analyst at Moor Insights & Strategy, in Austin, Texas. “Think of a new MacBook SE, as an example, that gets down to a price point of $699. That has the capability to move markets."

PC makers should quake in fear: An affordable MacBook would wipe the floor with current midrange laptops like Acer's Aspire, Dell's Inspiron, and HP's Pavilion.

Yet there may be a ceiling on the Mac's popularity. Top-tier games haven't embraced Apple Silicon, and the company continues to struggle with outreach to developers like Activision and Electronic Arts. Gamers will stick with Windows so long as it supports games the Mac does not.

The Mac's success will also bring lots of flattery, in the form of imitation. Microsoft is working on its own in-house chip, Intel has a new CEO and a long-term plan to partner with other chip makers, and Nvidia will acquire Arm once regulatory hurdles are cleared.

This could lead to a PC processor showdown the likes of which we've not seen in 30 years. “A fire has been lit under Intel, and Advanced Micro Devices, and Qualcomm, and Arm," said Moorhead. “All eyes are on the CPU."

It's impossible to say who will win just yet. But I'll enjoy the fireworks.

The Conversation (1)
Gareth Qually06 Aug, 2021
INDV

Maybe a touch optimistic thinking Apple will reach new levels of market dominance. If anything, it will be a signal to the industry that the ARM powered machines have been ready for the desktop/laptop for many years. I am excited by what they are doing and they are certainly are 'thinking different' again which can only be good for a diverse industry.

Deep Learning Could Bring the Concert Experience Home

The century-old quest for truly realistic sound production is finally paying off

12 min read
Vertical
Image containing multiple aspects such as instruments and left and right open hands.
Stuart Bradford
Blue

Now that recorded sound has become ubiquitous, we hardly think about it. From our smartphones, smart speakers, TVs, radios, disc players, and car sound systems, it’s an enduring and enjoyable presence in our lives. In 2017, a survey by the polling firm Nielsen suggested that some 90 percent of the U.S. population listens to music regularly and that, on average, they do so 32 hours per week.

Behind this free-flowing pleasure are enormous industries applying technology to the long-standing goal of reproducing sound with the greatest possible realism. From Edison’s phonograph and the horn speakers of the 1880s, successive generations of engineers in pursuit of this ideal invented and exploited countless technologies: triode vacuum tubes, dynamic loudspeakers, magnetic phonograph cartridges, solid-state amplifier circuits in scores of different topologies, electrostatic speakers, optical discs, stereo, and surround sound. And over the past five decades, digital technologies, like audio compression and streaming, have transformed the music industry.

Keep Reading ↓Show less
{"imageShortcodeIds":[]}