The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

The Downsizing of Microsoft’s Surface

Seriously Microsoft? You’re calling a 10.6-inch tablet “Surface”?

2 min read
The Downsizing of Microsoft’s Surface

 

I’m so disappointed. Microsoft yesterday announced its purported iPad killer, a tablet with a 10.6-inch diagonal screen called Surface. I’m not disappointed by the tablet itself—I haven’t seen more than a picture of it yet, so I can’t really say if its amazing or not. What’s got me down is the name: Surface.

This isn’t a new product name for Microsoft. Microsoft introduced the “Microsoft Surface” five years ago. That time, the Surface was a 30-inch—and later 40-inch--diagonal tabletop computer intended for businesses, with a multitouch display that could recognize bar-coded objects placed upon it. By 2009, you could find Surface computers in the occasional bar, bank, or retailer; I even spotted them occasionally in corporate lobbies or lounges. In 2011, Microsoft updated the Surface, making it thinner, lighter, and incorporating Corning’s Gorilla Glass, a chemically strengthened material used in iPhones and other mobile devices.

The Microsoft Surface wasn’t cheap—the original price was $15,000, coming down to $7600 last year—but there have been rumors that a consumer version was in the works, and any day now, it seemed, we’d be

covering our homes with surface computers. At least that’s the vision Microsoft execs—first Bill Gates, later Steve Balmer—presented year after year in the company’s keynote at the annual Consumer Electronics Show (see video, below).

So I’ve been waiting for a consumer Surface, thinking it was going to be really really cool. I thought it would turn my kitchen counter into a space-age command center, allowing me to spin pictures and push recipes around and, oh, maybe design a building or two while dinner is in the oven. Sure, I may be squinting at a little computer screen now, but in a couple of years, in my Microsoft-seeded fantasies, I knew I’d have a gigantic Surface to play with.

The reimagined consumer Surface, introduced yesterday, does have a few things in common with the tabletop Surface. It’ll run Windows, of course, and it has a multitouch screen. And the display surface will be Gorilla Glass.

But even if it’s a great little pad computer, I sure wouldn’t call 10.6 inches of display a Surface.

Photo top left: Surface circa 2012

Photo center right: Surface circa 2008

Video below: Bill Gates introducing the Surface, 2008

Follow me on Twitter @TeklaPerry

 

 

The Conversation (0)

Deep Learning Could Bring the Concert Experience Home

The century-old quest for truly realistic sound production is finally paying off

12 min read
Vertical
Image containing multiple aspects such as instruments and left and right open hands.
Stuart Bradford
Blue

Now that recorded sound has become ubiquitous, we hardly think about it. From our smartphones, smart speakers, TVs, radios, disc players, and car sound systems, it’s an enduring and enjoyable presence in our lives. In 2017, a survey by the polling firm Nielsen suggested that some 90 percent of the U.S. population listens to music regularly and that, on average, they do so 32 hours per week.

Behind this free-flowing pleasure are enormous industries applying technology to the long-standing goal of reproducing sound with the greatest possible realism. From Edison’s phonograph and the horn speakers of the 1880s, successive generations of engineers in pursuit of this ideal invented and exploited countless technologies: triode vacuum tubes, dynamic loudspeakers, magnetic phonograph cartridges, solid-state amplifier circuits in scores of different topologies, electrostatic speakers, optical discs, stereo, and surround sound. And over the past five decades, digital technologies, like audio compression and streaming, have transformed the music industry.

Keep Reading ↓Show less
{"imageShortcodeIds":[]}