Close

The Consumer Electronics Hall of Fame: Microsoft Xbox

Xbox was a blindingly spectacular exception in Microsoft’s otherwise mostly dismal record in consumer-oriented hardware

3 min read
Photo: Tony Cenicola/The New York Times/Redux
Photo: Tony Cenicola/The New York Times/Redux

photo Four’s a Crowd: The Xbox was introduced into an already crowded game-systems market in 2001 and clawed its way to the top with blazing graphics and a huge catalog of compatible games. Photo: Evan Amos/Wikipedia

It’s very unusual for any product category in the consumer-tech market to sustain four profitable competitors. In 2001, the year that Microsoft introduced its Xbox console, the game-systems market already had three: Nintendo, Sega, and Sony. Then, as now, Microsoft was eminent in software, but its record with hardware was woeful. The company’s failures included a grab bag of items that even tech nostalgists need to be reminded of, such as the Microsoft Mouse (1983), cordless phones (1998), and desktop speakers (1998).

Suffice it to say that in 1998 there were excellent reasons why no one would have expected Microsoft to succeed with hardware any more ambitious than the computer peripherals it had been dabbling in. That was the year Microsoft CEO Bill Gates approved a proposal to build what would be the most powerful, most feature-laden, and, quite possibly, most expensive game system when it hit the market.

photo Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, then a professional wrestler with acting ambitions, was the guest star at the Xbox’s unveiling at the 2001 CES. Photo: Jeff Christensen/Liaison/Getty Images

Then, as now, Microsoft engineers had a bone-deep understanding of the self-reinforcing circle created when you have a common hardware platform that a) works well and b) is easy to write software for. Drawing on Microsoft’s experience with PCs, they reasoned that if developers could just jump right in, creating a game rather than investing weeks or months figuring out how to write for the system, those developers could quickly create many software titles, raising the odds that a few of them would become hits. Those successes would increase the popularity of the platform, which would draw more developers, who would write more applications for the platform—some of which would become hits, making the platform more popular. And so on.

This paradigm ruled in the world of PCs; there was no reason why it wouldn’t work for a game system. In fact, the designers concluded, it would make sense if the game system actually was a PC, or something very similar. If successful, it could ride the PC industry’s economies of scale for years to come. On the software side, not only would PC application developers be able to quickly figure out how to write for the system, but the pool of potential developers would be enormous.

photo X Man: Seamus Blackley was a quarter of the quartet regarded as the core of the team that designed the original Xbox. Photo: Spencer Platt/Hulton Archive/Getty Images

Kevin Bachus, Seamus Blackley, Otto Berkes, and Ted Hase formed the nucleus of the team developing what they then referred to as the DirectX Box. They went with the PC industry standard x86 processor architecture, but elected to order a custom-designed 733-megahertz Intel “Coppermine” Pentium III (Sony’s PlayStation 2 was built around RISC processors from MIPS Computer Systems, which were commonly used in workstations). The graphics processing unit was the 233-MHz NV2A GPU from Nvidia. The designers added a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, and a hard drive—that last item being novel for game systems at the time.

To prime the pump, Microsoft in 2000 bought game developer Bungie, then in the process of creating Halo. Bungie had made public some brief clips of Halo, but those meager glimpses stoked a fervor among gamers to get their hands on it.

In 2001, Microsoft co-introduced the Xbox and Halo. It was roughly twice as powerful as Sony’s PlayStation 2, introduced the year before. The cabinet with the sculpted X on top looked muscular. For gamers who liked first-person shooters, Halo was insane fun. The system sold out; Halo set game sales records. There have been other hit games on the Xbox, but 18 years later the Xbox/Halo combination remains one of the longest running, most successful hardware-software one-two punches in computer history.

That original Xbox processor had a single core that ran at 733 MHz. Today, gamers are looking forward to playing Halo Infinite, scheduled to come out sometime in the second half of 2019, on Xbox Ones that incorporate processors that (as of this writing) run at 2.3 gigahertz and integrate eight cores.

Enter the member experience for exclusive contests and more.
The Conversation (0)

Intel Invests $20 billion in Ohio for Advanced Fabs

First major chip plant in the U.S. midwest slated to begin production in 2025

3 min read
An arial view of large white building surrounded by black parking lots is embedded in a mix of farmland and forest.

A rendering of Intel's Ohio fab site as it might look when complete in 2025.

Intel

Intel has chosen to expand its advanced manufacturing in a U.S. state neither the company nor any other chipmaker has a presence in, Ohio. Intel announced today that it will build two leading edge logic fabs east of Columbus at a cost of $20 billion. Construction is set to start in 2022 and production should begin in 2025, Intel says. The company gave no information about the fabs' capacities in terms of wafers per month. But it said the site, situated on four square kilometers in Licking County, could be expanded over the decade for a total investment of $100 billion.

The new fabs are part of a reset of Intel's manufacturing, a plan called IDM 2.0, that would see Intel regain its ability to make chips at the most advanced nodes and offer foundry services to other companies. It also comes as the United States embarks on an effort to grow advanced chipmaking capacity. Currently, all cutting edge chipmaking is done in Taiwan and South Korea. Both of the latter companies have announced plans for new cutting edge fabs in the United States, and the government plans to incentivize domestic production with $52-billion in incentives. The bill that would supply that money, the CHIPS Act, has passed in the U.S. Senate, but has not yet been taken up in the House of Representatives. "The scope and pace of Intel’s expansion in Ohio... will depend heavily on funding from the CHIPS Act," said Keyvan Esfarjani, Intel senior vice president of manufacturing, supply chain and operations in a press release.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less

For Better AR Cameras, Swap Plastic Lenses for Silicon Chips

Metalenz adds the power of polarization to its innovative PolarEyes chips

5 min read
Silicon Nanostructures

Metalenz uses standard semiconductor manufacturing processes to build metasurfaces comprising nanostructures that control light, with one chip replacing multiple traditional camera lenses.

Metalenz

This week, startup Metalenz announced that it has created a silicon chip that, paired with an image sensor, can distinguish objects by the way they polarize light. The company says its “PolarEyes” will be able to make facial authentication less vulnerable to spoofing, improve 3D imaging for augmented and virtual reality, aid in telehealth by distinguishing different types of skin cells, and enhance driving safety by spotting black ice and other hard-to-see road hazards.

The company, founded in 2017 and exiting stealth a year ago, previously announced that it was commercializing waveguides composed of silicon nanostructures as an alternative to traditional optics for use in mobile devices.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less

Adhesives Gain Popularity for Wearable Devices

Adhesive formulations help with challenging assembly of wearables and medical sensors

3 min read

A major challenge in wearable device assembly is to maximize the reliability of embedded circuits while keeping the package thin and flexible.

Shutterstock

This is a sponsored article brought to you by Master Bond.

Master Bond adhesive formulations provide solutions for challenging assembly applications in manufacturing electronic wearable devices. Product formulations include epoxies, silicones, epoxy-polyurethane hybrids, cyanoacrylates, and UV curing compounds.

There are some fundamental things to consider when deciding what is the right adhesive for the assembly of electronic wearable devices. Miniaturization of devices, and the need to meet critical performance specifications with multiple substrates, require an analysis of which chemical composition is most suitable to satisfy the required parameters.

These preliminary decisions are often predicated on the tradeoffs between different adhesive chemistries. They may vary widely, and in many cases are essential in achieving the needed goals in adhering parts and surfaces properly.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less