Close

The Consumer Electronics Hall of Fame: BRK First Alert Smoke Alarm

The chain of events leading to the first popular smoke alarm for homes started with a chain-smoking technician

4 min read
First Alert smoke alarm
Circle of Life: BRK’s first battery-operated smoke detector for residential use was released in 1976, a year after its main rival, Statitrol, got a similar product to market.
Photo: First Alert/BRK Brands

The race to create the modern residential smoke alarm began in earnest in the mid-1960s, not long after Duane D. Pearsall founded a company called Statitrol to sell heating and ventilation equipment. In 1963, a chain-smoking Statitrol technician exhaled cigarette smoke toward an ion generator, causing an ionization detector to spike. Similar phenomena had been reported as early as the 1930s. But this time, something big would come of it: Statitrol engineers immediately began devising a smoke detector that would exploit the phenomenon.

As is so often the case with technology, the pioneer, in this case Statitrol, would not be the one to reap long-lasting commercial success. In the end, most of that went to its main rival, BRK.

The construction of an ionization-type smoke detector involves placing a small amount of radioactive material (typically americium) in a tiny chamber between a pair of electrical plates. As the radioactive material decays, it releases energetic particles that ionize air molecules and set up a current between the charged plates. Smoke that enters impedes the current, tripping the alarm.

Ionization detectors were a big improvement over the previous technology, which detected heat rather than smoke and typically didn’t trigger an alarm until the area where the detector was mounted was aflame. Smoke, of course, typically spreads far faster than flames, so an ionization detector is much more likely to sound the alarm in advance of the spread of flames, providing critical additional seconds or minutes for escape.

The technological implementations weren’t sophisticated, but using radioactive material in a consumer item was a big deal at the time. The Atomic Energy Commission (now the Nuclear Regulatory Commission) had to approve all commercial use of radioactive elements. The AEC okayed smoke detectors for commercial properties in 1963, but didn’t green-light them for residential use until 1969.

Statitrol may have had a head start, but BRK claims to have beaten it to market with a battery-operated residential smoke detector. According to BRK, a model it commercialized in 1969 was the first such product to earn approval from Underwriters Laboratories (UL), the world’s most prominent safety-certifying agency.

f2 Photo: First Alert/BRK Brands

The whole point of that product seems to have been to secure a UL listing, however. And there were yet more regulatory hurdles to get over. Residential building codes had provisions only for smoke detectors connected to mains power. It wasn’t until 1974 that the National Fire Protection Association revised its NFPA 74 standard to support the installation of battery-operated models. BRK may have had a battery-operated model in 1969, but as of 1975 it was still pitching its AC models in ads.

In 1975, Statitrol began mass-producing what is widely regarded as the first practical battery-operated ionization-type smoke detector for the residential market, the SmokeGard 700. By the end of 1975, a little under 10 percent of all U.S. homes had a smoke detector.

That year, the National Bureau of Standards (now the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST) began a project to evaluate smoke-alarm technology. That project, known as the Indiana Dunes tests, concluded in 1976. Even before it was finished, the results were conclusive: smoke detectors would save lives.

Around the same time, several technological advances were being incorporated into smoke detectors, “including solid-state circuitry...more effective sensing and alarm sounding, and the option of AA batteries in some models,” according to the Safe Community Project, a nonprofit dedicated to fire safety and run by active and retired firefighters and medics.

By the early 1970s, with smoke detectors obviously on the cusp of being a big business, GE, Gillette, and Norelco entered the market. In 1976, BRK commercialized its first battery operated detector for residential use that carried the First Alert brand name.

The timing couldn’t have been better, because the U.S. government and independent safety agencies were all then touting the results of the Indian Dunes study. In 1976, the National Fire Protection Association Life Safety Code “required” that all U.S. homes have smoke alarms (technically this was a recommendation; the Life Safety Code is very influential but does not carry the force of law).

Though the new market had spawned half a dozen competitors, at least, BRK enjoyed two big advantages. It had been doing business with electrical contractors all along, so it had a channel into the home-builder market. As important, if not more so, was the distribution deal it had signed in 1974 with Sears, then the single most important national retailer of tools and do-it-yourself equipment in the United States.

With regulations and technology coming together, sales of smoke detectors took off, going from what NIST calls “token usage” through 1975 to reach millions of homes in just a few years. The share of U.S. residences with smoke alarms doubled to 20 percent by the end of 1976, and by 1990 roughly 90 percent of all U.S. homes had at least one. Since 1992 the figure has been roughly 95 percent. BRK First Alert was an early success, and it’s been among the sales leaders ever since.

The number of deaths in fires has been on a continuous downward trend for at least 100 years. The rate of reduction diminished through the 1950s and 1960s, however, before plunging again thanks to smoke detectors. The death rate was cut by half between 1975 and 2000. According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, a U.S. government agency, there are about 300,000 residential fires each year, leading to approximately 2,000 deaths. Two-thirds of those deaths occur in homes lacking smoke alarms or with nonfunctional alarms.

BRK is now a subsidiary of Newell Brands, in Hoboken, N.J. And Statitrol? It was sold by founder Duane Pearsall to Emerson Electric in 1977. It is no longer in business.

The Conversation (0)

Video Friday: Guitar Bot

Your weekly selection of awesome robot videos

3 min read
Closeup of a robotic arm strumming an acoustic guitar

Video Friday is your weekly selection of awesome robotics videos, collected by your friends at IEEE Spectrum robotics. We’ll also be posting a weekly calendar of upcoming robotics events for the next few months; here's what we have so far (send us your events!):

ICRA 2022: 23–27 May 2022, Philadelphia
ERF 2022: 28–30 June 2022, Rotterdam, Germany
CLAWAR 2022: 12–14 September 2022, Açores, Portugal

Let us know if you have suggestions for next week, and enjoy today's videos.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less

Dress Smart: This T-Shirt Senses Breathing Problems

Prototype garment provides wireless, real-time monitoring of a wearer’s respiratory patterns

2 min read
Close up of a person wearing dark long sleeved shirt. Multiple blue sensors and wires cover it.

This new smart T-shirt has thin antennas incorporated in the cloth, which detect deformations in the antennas as the user breathes in and out.

Université Laval

This article is part of our exclusive IEEE Journal Watch series in partnership with IEEE Xplore.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less

Adhesives Gain Popularity for Wearable Devices

Adhesive formulations help with challenging assembly of wearables and medical sensors

3 min read

A major challenge in wearable device assembly is to maximize the reliability of embedded circuits while keeping the package thin and flexible.

Shutterstock

This is a sponsored article brought to you by Master Bond.

Master Bond adhesive formulations provide solutions for challenging assembly applications in manufacturing electronic wearable devices. Product formulations include epoxies, silicones, epoxy-polyurethane hybrids, cyanoacrylates, and UV curing compounds.

There are some fundamental things to consider when deciding what is the right adhesive for the assembly of electronic wearable devices. Miniaturization of devices, and the need to meet critical performance specifications with multiple substrates, require an analysis of which chemical composition is most suitable to satisfy the required parameters.

These preliminary decisions are often predicated on the tradeoffs between different adhesive chemistries. They may vary widely, and in many cases are essential in achieving the needed goals in adhering parts and surfaces properly.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less