The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

Smartphone Voting Reduces User Errors in Mock Election

Voters made fewer mistakes in a mock election by using smartphones rather than traditional voting methods

2 min read
Smartphone Voting Reduces User Errors in Mock Election
Image: iStockphoto

Downloading an election app on your smartphone could someday replace the need to join long lines of fellow voters, and it might make elections work better. Researchers have found that smartphone owners make fewer errors using a mobile voting system than when using traditional voting methods.

A mock election conducted by Rice University researchers showed how voting on smartphones offers a more user-friendly process compared to electronic voting machines or paper ballots, but only among voters already familiar with smartphones. If computer scientists can solve the related security challenges, mobile voting could help boost election participation among both young and old smartphone owners in the future.

"Nobody likes to wait in line at the polling place, and so mobile voting offers the opportunity to cast votes when and where it is convenient for the voter," said Phil Kortum, assistant professor of psychology at Rice University, in a press release.

Smartphone voting could do more than just  improve voter participation by allowing individuals to vote using a familiar technology. It could also reduce the administrative costs of running polling stations and managing electronic voting machines or paper ballots.

The researchers recruited 84 study participants ranging in age between 18 and 68 years, including 48 smartphone owners. They also designed a mobile voting system, reporting the details in the January 2014 issue of Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Smartphone owners among the study participants made fewer mistakes while using the mobile voting system. But there was no significant difference in error rates for non-smartphone owners who used either the mobile voting system or traditional voting methods—a finding that implies room for improvement in possible future designs for mobile voting.

The study results could help shape future voting platforms and technologies at a time when smartphone ownership continues to rise in the United States and around the world. The Pew Research Internet Project found that about 56 percent of U.S. adults owned smartphones as of June 2013. (91 percent of U.S. adults owned some kind of phone.)

But don't expect to skip out of long lines for Election Day just yet. A mobile voting system or any type of remote, online voting process still faces huge security challenges that go beyond the technical glitches of electronic voting machines. Both voters and politicians will need to feel confident that any smartphone-based voting system can authenticate registered voters, as well as secure their votes against glitches or intentional hacking.

Secure online voting would almost certainly come first before any serious consideration of mobile voting systems. A 2009 Congressional effort to make voting more accessible for U.S. military personnel deployed overseas may pave the way for online voting on a broader basis. In 2013, a number of computer scientists signed a statement endorsing the pilot program's efforts to make remote electronic voting a reality.

Image: iStockphoto

The Conversation (0)

Why the Internet Needs the InterPlanetary File System

Peer-to-peer file sharing would make the Internet far more efficient

12 min read
Horizontal
An illustration of a series
Carl De Torres
LightBlue

When the COVID-19 pandemic erupted in early 2020, the world made an unprecedented shift to remote work. As a precaution, some Internet providers scaled back service levels temporarily, although that probably wasn’t necessary for countries in Asia, Europe, and North America, which were generally able to cope with the surge in demand caused by people teleworking (and binge-watching Netflix). That’s because most of their networks were overprovisioned, with more capacity than they usually need. But in countries without the same level of investment in network infrastructure, the picture was less rosy: Internet service providers (ISPs) in South Africa and Venezuela, for instance, reported significant strain.

But is overprovisioning the only way to ensure resilience? We don’t think so. To understand the alternative approach we’re championing, though, you first need to recall how the Internet works.

Keep Reading ↓Show less