Robotic Onesie Assists Babies at Risk for Cerebral Palsy

A motorized skateboard plus a machine-learning algorithm help infants explore the world and form valuable brain connections

4 min read

A young infant reaches for a toy using the SIPPC device.
Photo: Hugh Scott (Reprinted from Sooner Magazine, Summer 2015)

It’s not everyday that you see a six-month-old zipping across the floor on a motorized skateboard. Unless you are at the University of Oklahoma, that is.

There, a team of biomedical engineers and physical therapists have developed a motorized device to help infants at risk for cerebral palsy develop motor and cognitive skills. After a promising pilot study, the group began a larger trial of 56 infants this year. They use a robot equipped with power steering, a sophisticated machine-learning algorithm, and an endearing little cap studded with dozens of electrodes that track brain activity.

Cerebral palsy encompasses a number of early neurological disorders that affect movement and muscle coordination. The disorder can be caused by one of numerous insults early in life, including brain damage during birth, infection, and trauma. The condition is usually not diagnosed until the child reaches his or her first birthday, yet medical professionals agree that early intervention will often improve a child’s capabilities.

imgPhoto: University of Oklahoma

Early in her career at the University of Illinois in Chicago, Thubi Kolobe, a physical therapist and researcher, developed a movement test to predict which premature infants are most likely to develop CP or other developmental disorders. With the ability to identify those infants, she set out to intervene during a critical window of development (between 2 and 8 months of age), when a child begins kicking, moving and eventually crawling. The ability to move is not only important for the formation of motor skills, but also for brain development. As infants explore the world around them, they create new brain connections and develop cognitive skills such as spatial cognition, problem solving, and depth perception.

Crawling tends to be a reward-based learning process, so if an infant tries to move and doesn’t get the desired effect—as occurs with many children with CP, who do not crawl until an average age of 2, if at all—they may stop trying, and the brain eventually prunes away those motor and spatial connections. 

In 2003, Kolobe joined the faculty at OU and soon began collaborating with OU engineering professors Andrew Fagg, David Miller and Lei Ding to construct a device to help at-risk infants explore their environment and receive positive feedback that promotes brain development and encourages new motor skills. “As soon as you start to crawl, the world seems like a much bigger place,” says Fagg. “We hope, with the crawling, we’ll set them up to build other capabilities that will be really important later on in life.”

Now in its third iteration, the Self-Initiated Prone Progression Crawler or SIPPC (pronounced “sip-see”), is building on earlier elements: a soft pad that rolls along on three wheels and a sensor-studded outfit into which the infant is strapped. Fifty times per second, the 12 movement sensors would send measurements to a computer, depicting the child’s movement in 3-D on a nearby monitor. Additionally, cameras mounted on the SIPPC captured what each of the infant’s limbs was doing at a given time.

Perhaps more importantly, the movement sensor data was digested by a machine-learning algorithm that determined what the baby is trying to do, then directed the robot to give him or her an extra boost in the appropriate direction, rewarding the infant’s attempts. So if a baby girl tried to push off with her back feet, but without enough force to actually move, the robot would helpfully zip her a few inches ahead. If she moved an arm as if to push to the side, the robot could almost simultaneously turn her in that direction. Pilot tests with earlier versions of the device demonstrated that infants who wore the sensor-laden suit more often engaged the robot, and had more limb movement, than infants who did not.

Funded by the National Science Foundation’sNational Robotics Initiative, the team has now begun the aforementioned study of 56 infants between the ages of 4 and 8 months. This time, SIPPC includes a cap dotted with dozens of small, EEG electrodes for detecting real-time brain activity as the infants navigate. Right now, that brain data is being collected to see if there is a measurable change in brain activity over time as a result of using the device. Someday, however, it might even be used to create a brain-machine interface in which brainwaves alone predict an infant’s intention to move. “But that would be a long way off,” admits Fagg. “EEG is a very challenging domain, with very noisy data, and having an infant in motion dramatically increases the amount of noise.”

The study has another 6 to 9 months to go, and it will take time to get through the “overwhelming” amount of data produced by the experiment, says Fagg. Each session produces about 10 gigabytes of data, and the team just passed 1,000 sessions. “It’s wearing everybody down,” he says.

But there is light on the horizon. So far, the results seem to align with the pilot results, and parents are so encouraged by their children’s progress that they routinely ask to buy the device for home use. But the technology is not quite ready for that yet, says Fagg. “One needs to do a much larger-scale study with researchers at several universities,” he notes. “In the long run, we’d like to be there, but we need to do the science first.”

The Conversation (0)