Researchers Create “Spray-On” 2D Antennas

The titanium carbide antennas are thinner, lighter, and more flexible than traditional metal antennas

4 min read
Researchers from Drexel University have developed a way to 'spray paint' invisibly thin antennas from a type of two-dimensional material called MXene.
Photo: Kanit Hantanasirisakul/Drexel University

Engineers are good at making minuscule antennas. Nowadays, we can cram antennas into our smartphones or smartwatches without much trouble. But from the perspective of those devices, the antennas inside them are still bulky and take up too much space.

Now, researchers at Drexel University, in Philadelphia, have developed a two-dimensional, “spray-on” antenna that can be used for wearables, IoT devices, and anything else that could conceivably benefit from thin, lightweight, and flexible antennas. They published their work today in Science Advances.

The transparent titanium carbide antenna is a good option for any device in which you don’t want to actually see the antenna, says Asia Sarycheva, a Ph.D. student in Drexel’s Department of Materials Science and Engineering, who conducted the research. “With smart windows, for example, you have to have transparent circuits to send signals. Or solar cells—you need everything [to be] transparent.”

Of course, the antenna isn’t truly two-dimensional, but it is incredibly thin. It’s made from a type of material called a MXene—characterized by a metal like titanium or molybdenum bonded with carbides or nitrides.

The “spray-on” description is exactly what it sounds like. By dissolving MXenes in water, researchers produce a kind of water-based ink. Then, “we can just use a simple spray gun from Home Depot, and just spray the shape we want,” Sarycheva says.

Researchers from Drexel University have developed a way to 'spray paint' invisibly thin antennas from a type of two-dimensional material called MXene. Photo: Kanit Hantanasirisakul/Drexel University

The antenna the group constructed is roughly 100 nanometers thick. For comparison, copper antennas used today have a minimum thickness of about 3,000 nm. Then, “as soon as the ink dries, it’s ready to be used as an antenna,” says Babak Anasori, a nanomaterials researcher at Drexel.

Anasori says their group became interested in this approach when they found, in 2016, that a titanium carbide MXene has high electromagnetic interference shielding, which suggested to them that it would block unwanted electromagnetic signals. Around the same time, they noticed that researchers were publishing papers using nanomaterials, like carbon nanotubes, as antennas.

In addition to resisting electromagnetic interference, MXenes like titanium carbide had another advantage over carbon nanotubes. “We had MXene, which has a higher conductivity than these materials,” he says. “MXene as a bulk material, when you have a solution and spray it—it has a higher conductivity than carbon nanotubes in bulk.” That was all the inspiration they needed to pursue MXenes as a viable candidate to compete with traditional antennas and emerging alternatives.

And an early test supported their suspicions that MXenes could work. “We were getting a performance equivalent with copper antennas with one simple test,” Anasori says. So they looked further into it.

There are two methods to make a traditional antenna. One option is to create an incredibly thin sheet of metal and cut the antenna you need out of it. The other option is to construct it out of a paste of nanometals. The problem in both situations is the amount of processing it takes to produce thin sheets of metal or nanometal paste. And even then, the antennas are still bulky, relative to the small devices engineers want to put them in.

“With respect to transparent antennas, we believe there are applications we cannot imagine.”

Two-dimensional, sprayable antennas solve those problems. Not only are they lighter, they don’t require an immense amount of processing to create. “We can make ours in a few steps,” says Anasori. There’s no complicated manufacturing that goes into developing the MXenes—just add water and you’re ready to spray whatever antenna you need.

MXenes can also overcome a principle that limits how thin metal antennas can get, called the skin depth. In a nutshell, metal that is too thin cannot effectively pass electric current across its surface, which hampers its ability to function as an antenna. A 2D material like MXene doesn’t seem to share this restriction. “The conventional formula for MXene skin depth is 100 microns,” says Sarycheva, or about six orders of magnitude thicker than the antennas the team constructed.

Yet their antennas still passed signals without trouble. That said, it’s not entirely clear why a principle like skin depth doesn’t apply to a material like MXene. “We want to dig a little bit further into how the skin depth is working on a 2-dimensional nanoscale,” says Sarycheva.

Anasori says their antennas could easily be used in devices like smartphones, or other devices where the antenna is enclosed. Because their current solution is water-based, and MXenes are hydrophilic, the antennas will slough off whatever surface they’re printed on as soon as they get wet again.

That’s why the team is now exploring new composites to use as a solution, rather than water, which would open the door on sprayable antennas for applications in wet or humid environments. One option the team is looking at is suspending the MXene in simple polymers.

“There is a lot of work to be done on the fundamental side,” says Anasori, “and many other applications we want to explore.” Besides devices that would benefit from their transparent nature, like smart windows or solar panels, Sarycheva believes these antennas would be a natural fit for RFIDs on products in workerless stores. But their speculations don’t end there.

“With respect to transparent antennas,” says Anasori, “we believe there are applications we cannot imagine.”

The Conversation (0)

The Cellular Industry’s Clash Over the Movement to Remake Networks

The wireless industry is divided on Open RAN’s goal to make network components interoperable

13 min read
Photo: George Frey/AFP/Getty Images

We've all been told that 5G wireless is going to deliver amazing capabilities and services. But it won't come cheap. When all is said and done, 5G will cost almost US $1 trillion to deploy over the next half decade. That enormous expense will be borne mostly by network operators, companies like AT&T, China Mobile, Deutsche Telekom, Vodafone, and dozens more around the world that provide cellular service to their customers. Facing such an immense cost, these operators asked a very reasonable question: How can we make this cheaper and more flexible?

Their answer: Make it possible to mix and match network components from different companies, with the goal of fostering more competition and driving down prices. At the same time, they sparked a schism within the industry over how wireless networks should be built. Their opponents—and sometimes begrudging partners—are the handful of telecom-equipment vendors capable of providing the hardware the network operators have been buying and deploying for years.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less