Close

Qualcomm Introduces New Chipsets for 60-Gigahertz Wi-Fi

The chipsets are the first to utilize the new 802.11ay standard

2 min read
New chipsets use the new 802.11ay Wi-Fi standard
Illustration: iStockphoto

Millimeter waves aren’t just for 5G networks. The gigahertz frequencies could also be a boon for Wi-Fi. Routers like the Nighthawk XR700, which sends and receives signals at 60 gigahertz, have emerged in the past few years, though they’ve remained useful largely for specialized applications like online gaming.

“60-GHz Wi-Fi is not new by any means,” says Caleb Banks, a senior manager of product marketing at Qualcomm. “But it’s very complex. Putting millimeter-wave technology into a mobile device is challenging.”

Qualcomm hopes to make 60-GHz Wi-Fi easier with two new chipsets, announced today. The chipsets, the QCA64x8 and QCA64x1, make use of the new IEEE standard 802.11ay. 802.11ay improves upon the 2014 standard 802.11ad, which laid the groundwork for 60-GHz Wi-Fi.

Traditionally, the 2.4-GHz and 5-GHz bands have been synonymous with Wi-Fi. However, data demands continue to grow—particularly with applications like AR/VR on the horizon—and the old Wi-Fi spectrum bands won’t be able to cope on their own.

At first blush, 60-GHz Wi-Fi offers a whole host of advantages over 2.4- and 5-GHz Wi-Fi. The higher frequency offers multigigabit speeds and much lower latency. A 60-GHz router could also theoretically be more power efficient, since it will take far less time for uploads and downloads, meaning it can spend more time in power-saver mode.

That said, 60-GHz Wi-Fi faces some of the same challenges as 5G cellular networks, which will operate in similar regions of the spectrum. “The limitation to 60 GHz—and millimeter waves in general—is range,” says Banks. By range, Banks means that the problem is not just that millimeter waves don’t have as much effective distance as longer-wavelength, lower-frequency communications do, but also their inability to penetrate objects. “2.4 and 5 [GHz] are great,” says Banks. “They’ll go through walls.” 60 GHz will not.

That said, Qualcomm still sees potential. “60-GHz Wi-Fi has lots of great applications, if you have line of sight,” Banks says. That includes straightforward applications like high-speed downloads to emerging uses like Wi-Fi sensing to detect people and gestures using millimeter waves.

The Wireless Gigabit Alliance (WiGig), a trade association focused on developing the 60-GHz band, helped develop the 802.11ad standard that underpins 60-GHz Wi-Fi. The standard was published in 2014, but it became apparent that the band, as it was utilized at the time, wasn’t as effective as it could be.

802.11ay became WiGig’s (and WiGig’s parent organization, Wi-Fi Alliance’s) effort to improve upon 802.11ad. The new standard adds channel bonding, which combines multiple channels to use more spectrum simultaneously. 802.11ay took the speeds offered by the earlier standard—about 5 gigabits per second—and raised them up to 10 gigabits per second or more.

Banks says Qualcomm’s new chipsets will be interoperable with 60-GHz Wi-Fi devices on the market today, despite being built on different standards.

And for those wondering if cellular data and Wi-Fi might somehow mix as they both push into these new bands of spectrum, there’s no reason to expect any sort of hybrid emerging from a merging of the two. “Cellular is carefully licensed and allocated,” says Banks. “What Wi-Fi brings to the table is an ecosystem of products in an unlicensed spectrum.” There’s no reason to suspect that distinction to disappear in the millimeter-wave band.

The Conversation (0)

The Cellular Industry’s Clash Over the Movement to Remake Networks

The wireless industry is divided on Open RAN’s goal to make network components interoperable

13 min read
Photo: George Frey/AFP/Getty Images
DarkBlue2

We've all been told that 5G wireless is going to deliver amazing capabilities and services. But it won't come cheap. When all is said and done, 5G will cost almost US $1 trillion to deploy over the next half decade. That enormous expense will be borne mostly by network operators, companies like AT&T, China Mobile, Deutsche Telekom, Vodafone, and dozens more around the world that provide cellular service to their customers. Facing such an immense cost, these operators asked a very reasonable question: How can we make this cheaper and more flexible?

Their answer: Make it possible to mix and match network components from different companies, with the goal of fostering more competition and driving down prices. At the same time, they sparked a schism within the industry over how wireless networks should be built. Their opponents—and sometimes begrudging partners—are the handful of telecom-equipment vendors capable of providing the hardware the network operators have been buying and deploying for years.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less