The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

Poker Pros Battle Artificial Intelligence to a Statistical Draw

Top poker players fought a computer program to a draw despite winning slightly more chips

2 min read
Hands holding a bunch of poker chips.
Photo: iStockphoto

Humans can breathe easier for now after four of the world’s best poker players held their own against the best artificial intelligence in no-limit Texas hold’em. The poker pros played a combined total of 80,000 hands with the computer program, named Claudico, during an intense two-week competition.

The "Brains Vs. Artificial Intelligence" was the first major battle between top human poker players and a computer program in heads-up (two-player) no-limit Texas hold’em, a version of poker that allows for unrestricted bet sizes. The human players held a $732 713 lead over Claudico by the end of the contest, which was held at the Rivers Casino in Pittsburgh. But considering that $170 million was bet, the humans’ edge was too small to translate into a statistically significant win over the computer program. 

imgIt’s quite possible that the AI is going to catch up to and surpass the humans and we won’t be able to tell. Find out why here.

"We knew Claudico was the strongest computer poker program in the world, but we had no idea before this competition how it would fare against four Top 10 poker players," said Tuomas Sandholm, a professor of computer science at Carnegie Mellon University, in a press release. "It would have been no shame for Claudico to lose to a set of such talented pros, so even pulling off a statistical tie with them is a tremendous achievement."

The human players who participated in the competition rank among the world’s top 10 in heads-up, no-limit Texas hold’em. Bjorn Li came out ahead of Claudico by $529 033, followed by Doug Polk with $213 671, and Dong Kim with $70 491. Jason Les fell behind the AI by $80 482.

Sandholm and his colleagues who designed Claudico would have probably come out looking like winners in any case. They created Claudico as an improved version of a previous program, called Tartanian7, which had beaten all other artificial intelligence challengers in a previous no-limit Texas Hold’em contest during the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence’s Annual Computer Poker Competition last July. The computer scientists saw the competition against top human poker players as an unprecedented experiment to test Claudico’s capabilities.

"Beating humans isn't really our goal; it's just a milestone along the way," Sandholm said in the press release. "What we want to do is create an artificial intelligence that can help humans negotiate or make decisions in situations where they can't know all of the facts."

Still, the Carnegie Mellon team plans to use the 80 000 hands played with the poker pros to better train and test future computer programs. Sanholm said he was confident that artificial intelligence would soon be able to beat the best of what humanity has to offer.

The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
Vertical
A plate of spaghetti made from code
Shira Inbar
DarkBlue1

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less
{"imageShortcodeIds":["31996907"]}