Off-Grid Electricity Projects Are Starved for Funds

Despite the promise of off-grid solar, 99 percent of funding still goes to grid projects

2 min read

Photo: Tahir Ahmed/Barcroft/Getty Images
Bright Minds: Students in Odisha, India, use solar-powered lamps to study.
Photo: Tahir Ahmed/Barcroft/Getty Images

Despite innovative off-grid technology and high-profile initiatives, electrification in sub-Saharan Africa still trails population growth. In 2009 there were 585 million people in the region without power. Five years later, that figure had risen to 632 million, according to the latest International Energy Agency statistics.

A first-of-its-kind analysis of the flow of capital, released in September by the United Nations’ Sustainable Energy for All program, shows that off-grid systems simply are not getting the support they deserve.

“This research shows that only 1 percent of financing for electrification is going into this very promising and dynamic energy solution,” says program CEO Rachel Kyte, who calls the findings “a wake-up call” to the international community.

The 20 countries targeted in the U.N. report account for 80 percent of the estimated 1.06 billion people around the globe living without electricity. The report found that total investment in electricity infrastructure averaged US $19.4 billion a year in 2013 and 2014 (the latest year with full statistics). Of that, only $200 million per year was dedicated to off-grid systems.

This is “alarming,” the authors write, considering off-grid solar’s “enormous promise” to rapidly and cheaply deliver basic electrical services compared with the ability of traditional grids. The International Energy Agency estimates that 70 percent of rural electrification is best achieved by off-grid systems, including solar.

The report does note a few hopeful developments: The World Bank this year committed $150 million to rural off-grid renewable projects in Kenya, and companies installing pay-as-you-go off-grid solar systems raised $223 million last year.

Even those solar enterprises, however, face an enduring “grid is best” mentality. “Most of the political actors in this sphere still believe that the ‘real’ power is the national grid,” says Daniel Becker, founder of Rafiki Power, a company that has built minigrids in Tanzania and wants to invest throughout East Africa.

Becker says vague plans for extending national power grids also create a barrier to off-grid developers. “No one wants to give you money to build a minigrid where the government says the grid will be there in five years,” he says.

Other financing hang-ups relate to project scale and revenue expectations. Lenders and governments are only willing to support projects providing about 10,000 electrical connections, Becker says, whereas Rafiki’s modeling predicts that cost-saving economies of scale start to kick in after 200,000 to 300,000 connections.

And then there is the matter of funders’ expectations that off-grid investments will be paid back with fees from rural consumers. That contradicts the history of electrification in major economies, where urban consumers subsidized power-grid extensions to the hinterlands. “If the government plan is to electrify certain regions, they need to subsidize part,” says Elham Ibrahim, the African Union’s Commissioner for Infrastructure and Energy.

Andy Schroeter, whose Laos-based firm Sunlabob Renewable Energy has been an off-grid rural electrification pioneer since 2001, echoes Becker’s views. For over a decade, he says, international lenders have prioritized low cost over long-term sustainability, resulting in shoddy systems that lack local support.

In Myanmar, international investment in electrification has risen sharply in recent years amid democratic reforms. Sunlabob recently completed a Japanese government-funded project there, installing 11 village minigrids at a price of $8.20 per watt of peak solar generation.

But Schroeter says award values have crashed, noting that a recent minigrid project in Myanmar backed by the World Bank was awarded to a bidder for $4.20 per watt. “For this price, you really can’t come up with a long-lasting project. It’s impossible,” says Schroeter.

A version of this article appears in our Energywise blog.

This article is for IEEE members only. Join IEEE to access our full archive.

Join the world’s largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to all of Spectrum’s articles, podcasts, and special reports. Learn more →

If you're already an IEEE member, please sign in to continue reading.

Membership includes:

  • Get unlimited access to IEEE Spectrum content
  • Follow your favorite topics to create a personalized feed of IEEE Spectrum content
  • Save Spectrum articles to read later
  • Network with other technology professionals
  • Establish a professional profile
  • Create a group to share and collaborate on projects
  • Discover IEEE events and activities
  • Join and participate in discussions