The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

Not Much New in Yesterday's Congressional Hearings on Toyota & Runaway Cars

US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Says It Has Two EEs Working For It

2 min read
Not Much New in Yesterday's Congressional Hearings on Toyota & Runaway Cars

Yesterday marked the end for this week, anyway, of Toyota's testimony in front of a US congressional committee. Next week, Toyota representatives will testify in front of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation where many expect it will receive a more "cordial" welcome, if testifying in front of any government investigative committee can be deemed cordial. The Senate committee looks like it will be focusing more on the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) role in the recall, and has sent a letter to the NHTSA inspector general to look into how NHTSA handles recalls in general.

Yesterday's US House Committee on Energy and Commerce hearings didn't produce much more insightful information on the cause of complaints of sudden unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles. Toyota President Akio Toyoda apologized and promised to listen more to Toyota customer complaints, including setting up teams to investigate unintended acceleration complaints within 24 hours. He still insisted that there was no defect in Toyota's electronic throttle design, although he did not contradict the testimony on Tuesday that something other than floor mat or sticky pedals might be the cause of runaway cars. President Toyoda also said that he was not fully aware of the complaints about unintended acceleration until recently.

Secretary of U. S. Department of Transportation Ray LaHood said once again that Toyota cars that were being recalled and not yet fixed were "not safe" although, like last time, he backed off that claim when pressed. He also clarified that of the 125 engineers who worked for NHTSA, two were electrical engineers. However, he did not specify their roles at NHTSA nor did he mention any software engineers on NHTSA's engineering staff.

A good "blow by blow" review of the day's hearing can be found here at the Washington Post.

What is most likely to happen next given the two hearings so far and what is expected to happen at next week's hearing is that the US Congress will demand NHTSA conduct a review of electronics and software use in vehicles and determine whether more rigorous governmental safety standards are needed; a congressional demand will be made for all vehicles to contain comprehensive black boxes; and there will likely be demands for lower triggers for mandatory vehicle recalls.

Each would create additional costs for car manufacturers and ultimately to consumers, so it will be interesting to see what actually ends up making it into law after the risk/reward negotiations/debates take place among consumer advocates, politicians, regulators, car manufacturers and their suppliers.

The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
Vertical
A plate of spaghetti made from code
Shira Inbar
DarkBlue1

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less
{"imageShortcodeIds":["31996907"]}