You have to admire their imagery.

In April, the managing director of the Wall Street JournalRobert Thomsoncalled news aggregators like Google, Yahoo, etc., promiscuous tech tapeworms.

At the World Media Summit in Beijing, Rupert Murdoch, owner of the world's second largest media company News Corporation ,which includes newspapers such as the Sun and the Times in the UK, The Australian and The Daily Telegraph in Australia and the New York Post and Wall Street Journal in the US, along with over twenty magazines, and various radio and TV investments such as Fox Broadcasting in the US (see here for all the various holdings), called aggregators "content kleptomaniacs" and "plagiarists," among other things, according to the BBC.

Quoting from the BBC article:

"The aggregators and plagiarists will soon have to pay a price for the co-opting of our content. ... If we do not take advantage of the current movement toward paid content, it will be the content creators - the people in this hall - who will pay the ultimate price and the content kleptomaniacs who triumph."

Associated Press chief executive Tom Curley supported Mr. Murdoch's call for the paying for news content and said that "content creators must act quickly and decisively act to take back control of our content"

An AP story quotes Mr. Curley as saying that,

"Crowd-sourcing web services such as Wikipedia, YouTube and Facebook, have become preferred customer destinations for breaking news, displacing web sites of traditional news publishers.... We will no longer tolerate the disconnect between people who devote themselves - at great human and economic cost - to gathering news of public interest and those who profit from it without supporting it."

It will be interesting to see whether Google and others will be willing to pay for content, or whether they will instead be inspired to become news gathering organizations themselves, and aim to put AP, News Corp and the others out of business.

The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
A plate of spaghetti made from code
Shira Inbar

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less