Mass Customization Hurting Airbus 380 Production

Engineers Said To Be "Irked" By Airline Requests for Special Passenger Creature Comfort Features

2 min read
Mass Customization Hurting Airbus 380 Production

Last year I wrote a story for Spectrum on in-flight entertainment systems and how airlines use them not only to attract new business but also to relieve the stress of passengers cooped up in a confined space for hours on end. However, an article in today's Bloomberg News indicates that providing passenger creature comforts may have gone a step too far, at least in regard to the AirbusA380.

As noted here and here, Airbus has had trouble producing the A380, which was delivered 2 years behind schedule and double its originally estimated $6 billion cost. French and German engineers used different software tools which led to early production planes having to be rewired. 

According to the Bloomberg story, another production problem has been that Airbus has allowed the airlines to extensively customize the A380. For instance, airlines in addition to installing state-of-art in-flight entertainment systems, have added showers, enclosed suites and bar lounges which have proved popular with both passengers and the airlines but have caused problems for engineers in trying to ramp up production.

Bloomberg quoted Rupinder Vig, an analyst at Morgan Stanley in London, as saying, "They [Airbus] customized the plane to death, and that’s preventing them from reaching the production levels they'd talked about."

Airbus Chief Executive Officer Thomas Enders admitted to Bloomberg that customization has proved to be "a big challenge" - i.e., a big headache, especially to the Airbus production engineers who are trying desperately to increase production line efficiency. The Bloomberg article says the engineers are "irked" by all the changes.

Boeing, the article goes on to say, limits the amount of airline customization in its 787 Dreamliner by having a pre-set number of different customization packages available for airlines to choose from. Then again, Boeing's 787  doesn't have much cabin space to play with as an Airbus 380. Airbus markets this extra space as "more room to breath" in.

Probably the only saving grace is that the world-wide recession has slowed the demand for the A380, with 13 of the 16 airlines who ordered the aircraft pushing back their desired delivery dates. Lufthansaannounced just yesterday that it was deferring delivery of 15 of its order of A380's, for example.

However, as the article notes, the additional costs incurred by the mass customization haven't helped Airbus' bottom line, and there are doubts about whether the plane will ever turn a profit.

The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
Vertical
A plate of spaghetti made from code
Shira Inbar
DarkBlue1

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less
{"imageShortcodeIds":["31996907"]}