Racetrack Memory Gets a Boost

With ultrafast pulses, it's possible to write bits in picoseconds—100 times faster than today's technologies

2 min read
All-optical switching. Data is stored in the form of ‘bits’, which contains digital 0 (North Poles down) or 1 (North Poles up). Data writing is achieved by ‘switching’ the direction of the poles via the application of short laser pulses (in red).
Illustration: Eindhoven University of Technology

Zapping a magnetic nanowire with an ultrafast laser can create a new type of fast, efficient memory, according to researchers in the Netherlands.

Light has long been used to move data around quickly, and with the growing number of devices in the Internet of Things, the demand for moving data around a chip is soaring. It’s faster and more energy efficient if that can be done without adding extra electronics to convert the light into an electrical signal. “The problem is you cannot store light, it’s very difficult,” says Mark Lalieu, a PhD candidate in applied physics at Eindhoven University of Technology and an author of a recent paper on the work in Nature Communications. He and his colleagues have designed a device to act as an on-chip buffer, a sort of random-access memory for light pulses.

The technologies the team is working with have both been around for several years. One is using femtosecond pulses of light to flip the direction of magnetization within a material. Unfortunately, it can take several laser pulses to achieve the switching, so the writing time for a bit is long. The other technology is a so-called racetrack memory, a length of wire in which bits of memory are moved along by electrical current, at rates greater than a kilometer per second.

Lalieu, along with his professors Bert Koopmans and Reinoud Lavrijsen, combined the two technologies, and used a synthetic ferromagnet for the nanowire. The wire consists of a layer of cobalt and a layer of gallium, which are magnetized in opposite directions. Hitting the wire with a laser pulse heats the material, causing the magnetic spin of the two materials to interact with each other and flip to the opposite of whatever it was before, creating the 1s and 0s of digital logic.

As each bit is written, the electrical current in the wire moves it along, leaving an empty space for the next bit, so neither the wire nor the laser have to move. The upshot is that bits can be written in picoseconds, somewhere from 100 to 1,000 times faster than current technology.

The prototype the team built used micron-sized wires. To use it on chips, they’ll have to shrink it down to nanometer scale and combine it with chip-scale fast lasers.

In a review of research into writing magnetic memory with ultrashort light pulses, Alexey V. Kimel of Radboud University in the Netherlands and Mo Li of the University of Washington, say that such an approach seems like a promising way to deal with “the explosive increase in the rate of data generation and storage.” They write, “femtosecond opto-magnetism will have an important role in the further development of technology, as it enables exploring the mechanisms of magnetic switching at the fastest-ever timescale.”

The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
A plate of spaghetti made from code
Shira Inbar

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less