Join IEEE Spectrum editors on 27 Oct. at 1pm ET for a conversation on social audio app Clubhouse.

Close bar

There was a very interesting story over the weekend in the New York Times about people losing their electronic devices and trying to get them back or at least deactivated, and the singular refusal of many device makers to help.

For instance, if you lose or have your Kindle stolen, Amazon's policy is, says the Times, that

"... it will help locate a missing Kindle only if the company is contacted by a police officer bearing a subpoena."

This is Amazon's policy despite the fact that it knows when someone is downloading content to a Kindle.

The Times story says one person who lost his Kindle sent Amazon emails requesting the address where he could have the police send a subpoena and after getting no reply started getting suspicious that Amazon really doesn't want lost or stolen Kindles found. He is quoted in the story as saying,

"I finally concluded that Amazon knew the device was being used and preferred to sell content to anyone who possessed the device, rather than assist in returning it to its rightful owner."

Amazon's policy would also seem to encourage the theft of Kindles.

The Times story says Sirius XM Radio follows the same policy as Amazon before it will deactivate or hand over information about a missing radio. However, the Times story notes that with Sirius Satellite Radio, a Canadian company that is affiliated with Sirius XM but is a separate company, a subscriber can have his or her radio deactivated if he or she signs a statement that it has been stolen and asks the company to stop providing service to it.

Interestingly, the Times story notes that in England,

"... major cell phone players keep a centralized black list for mobile phone serial numbers, allowing consumers to flag lost or stolen phones so they cannot be re-registered."

US telcos don't provide the same service, unfortunately.

It would be useful to have a list of all tech companies who follow the "show me a police officer with a subpoena" policy.

So, Risk Factor readers, have any of you lost or had an electronic device stolen, and had the manufacturer refuse to deactivate it?

Also, what other countries' telcos have policies similar to that of England's?

The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
Vertical
A plate of spaghetti made from code with a single strand of "spaghetti code" being pulled from the top of the frame in a neverending loop on a blue gradient background.
Shira Inbar
DarkBlue1

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less
{"imageShortcodeIds":["31996907"]}