Although Japan’s earthquake early-warning system sent out millions of automated alerts via TV, radio, and cellphone last Friday to warn people of the 9.0-magnitude quake, not everyone got the message. The idea behind the alerts is to give people a brief window—typically tens of seconds—to mentally and physically prepare themselves before the arrival of the first tremors. But if you happened to be in Tokyo watching TV that day, you might have assumed all was right with the world. 

In a revealing video, “Yuanzency” juxtaposed the feeds from six Tokyo TV stations at the time of the quake:

Only NHK, in the upper left-hand corner, is on the ball. Seconds after seismometers detect the quake off the coast of northeastern Japan, an alert pops up, with a map showing the epicenter and the affected region; shortly afterward, live video of quivering buildings is being televised. The other five commercial stations continue with their usual afternoon programming and ads for another several minutes, by which time viewers would have already noticed that the room around them was violently shaking.

To be fair to the laggards, NHK, as a public broadcasting entity, is legally obligated to carry such emergency alerts from the Japan Meteorological Agency. But in the face of impending disaster, the interests of viewers should trump advertisers, shouldn’t they?

Meanwhile, though, some Japanese are complaining of early-warning fatigue. As of noon on 16 March (local time), the country had experienced 3 aftershocks greater than magnitude 7.0 and 48 larger than 6.0, and the vast majority of those had triggered an early-warning message. The problem isn’t so much the messages but the distinctive ringtone that prefaces each one:

Sounds pleasant enough—harmonic, slightly insistent yet not too hysterical. But for those who’ve received dozens of such alerts in the last week, the tone now carries an ominous association. “I duck underneath the table every time I hear the Warning. It’s like an air-raid siren,” tweeted UnConiglioNero.

Why not change the tune? suggests Kiske. “The sound of the warning is so scary. Can we get Brian Eno to compose a new melody?”

[Via Global Voices]

This is part of our ongoing coverage of Japan's earthquake and nuclear emergency.


The Conversation (0)

Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development

It’s hard to learn, but your code will produce fewer nasty surprises

11 min read
A plate of spaghetti made from code
Shira Inbar

You’d expectthe longest and most costly phase in the lifecycle of a software product to be the initial development of the system, when all those great features are first imagined and then created. In fact, the hardest part comes later, during the maintenance phase. That’s when programmers pay the price for the shortcuts they took during development.

So why did they take shortcuts? Maybe they didn’t realize that they were cutting any corners. Only when their code was deployed and exercised by a lot of users did its hidden flaws come to light. And maybe the developers were rushed. Time-to-market pressures would almost guarantee that their software will contain more bugs than it would otherwise.

Keep Reading ↓Show less