Holy Grail: Self-Sustaining Fusion

A reactor is on the horizon--but will it always be on the horizon?

2 min read

Thermonuclear fusion is, in principle, a hugely attractive energy source. It relies on a fuel, hydrogen, that abounds everywhere in the world, and on processes that release no greenhouse gases. In contrast to nuclear fission, it yields only short-lived radioactive waste that is relatively easily handled and cannot be made into raw material for nuclear weaponry.

If a fusion reactor could be made to work economically, the payoff would truly be a Holy Grail. The rub: enormous amounts of pressure and heat are required to make fusion happen, and even if the technical feat of creating self-sustaining fusion reactions can be accomplished in principle, there remain the challenges of achieving a net energy gain and, even tougher, a net economic gain.

Illustration: ITER

Power Squeeze: In the gourd-shaped toroidal cavity of the proposed tokamak reactor, a plasma is heated and compressed by magnetic fields set up by the surrounding coils to generate self-sustaining fusion reactions.

So great are those challenges, in fact, that the prospect of building a commercially viable reactor has come to resemble an ever-receding mirage--a promise that is somehow always just 25-50 years ahead.

In fusion, hydrogen isotopes are made to combine to form helium, bringing an enormous energy yield with the release of neutrons and alpha particles. One way of doing this, called intertial confinement fusion, is to train giant lasers on pellets of hydrogen fuel. That's what's being done at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's National Ignition Facility in California, mainly to test and evaluate some of the processes that take place in thermonuclear weapons.

The favored approach for electricity generation, dubbed magnetic confinement, is to achieve compression and heating of the isotopes by means of powerful fields, usually in toroidal machines. It got its first big tests at the Joint European Torus, Abingdon, UK, and at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory in New Jersey, where reactors momentarily demonstrated sustained reactions in the mid-1990s.

The next main event is to be the design and completion of ITER, the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, an international collaboration in a US $5 billion plant to generate continuous self-sustaining reactions in a so-called burning plasma. ITER has suffered many vicissitudes since its conception more than a decade ago, including decisions by the U.S. government to drop out of and then rejoin the group. The U.S. Department of Energy has now declared ITER its highest priority among major new facilities and upgrades, but the project still awaits a final design and selection of a site.

No project of this scale gets adopted without a lot of politics. U.S. President George W. Bush decided to get back into ITER under considerable pressure from Britain's leader, Tony Blair, and evidently he backed a proposed site near Barcelona in return for Spain's support in the Iraq war. The European Union, meanwhile, has thrown its support to a site in southern France, at the Cadarache nuclear complex; the choice between that site and one in Japan was to have been made on 20 December in Washington, D.C.

Keep Reading ↓Show less

This article is for IEEE members only. Join IEEE to access our full archive.

Join the world’s largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to all of Spectrum’s articles, podcasts, and special reports. Learn more →

If you're already an IEEE member, please sign in to continue reading.

Membership includes:

  • Get unlimited access to IEEE Spectrum content
  • Follow your favorite topics to create a personalized feed of IEEE Spectrum content
  • Save Spectrum articles to read later
  • Network with other technology professionals
  • Establish a professional profile
  • Create a group to share and collaborate on projects
  • Discover IEEE events and activities
  • Join and participate in discussions
This photograph shows a car with the words “We Drive Solar” on the door, connected to a charging station. A windmill can be seen in the background.

The Dutch city of Utrecht is embracing vehicle-to-grid technology, an example of which is shown here—an EV connected to a bidirectional charger. The historic Rijn en Zon windmill provides a fitting background for this scene.

We Drive Solar

Hundreds of charging stations for electric vehicles dot Utrecht’s urban landscape in the Netherlands like little electric mushrooms. Unlike those you may have grown accustomed to seeing, many of these stations don’t just charge electric cars—they can also send power from vehicle batteries to the local utility grid for use by homes and businesses.

Debates over the feasibility and value of such vehicle-to-grid technology go back decades. Those arguments are not yet settled. But big automakers like Volkswagen, Nissan, and Hyundai have moved to produce the kinds of cars that can use such bidirectional chargers—alongside similar vehicle-to-home technology, whereby your car can power your house, say, during a blackout, as promoted by Ford with its new F-150 Lightning. Given the rapid uptake of electric vehicles, many people are thinking hard about how to make the best use of all that rolling battery power.

Keep Reading ↓Show less