The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

Georgia Tech Rescue Robot Moves Like a Snake, Doesn't Look Like One

Scalybot 2 is definitely the least snakey of all the snakebots we've seen, but it's got the locomotion down perfectly

2 min read
Georgia Tech Rescue Robot Moves Like a Snake, Doesn't Look Like One

On Wednesday we wrote about a robotic rescue snake that could be deployed into disaster areas by trained dogs. Georgia Tech has also been working on snake-inspired rescue robots, and they've come up with a new form of robotic locomotion based on a trick that snakes have been using for years, called rectilinear movement.

Rectilinear locomotion is when a snake moves by lifting up the scales on its belly, moving them forward, and then putting them back down on the ground again and pulling the rest of its body along, turning itself into a sort of traveling wave of muscle. Since the snake doesn't have to undulate its entire body, it's an efficient (albeit slow) form of locomotion that's especially adaptable to high-angle surfaces with varying friction, and to narrow crevices without much room to maneuver. 

Hamid Marvi, a Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. candidate at Georgia Tech, has created a robot called Scalybot 2 that's able to mimic a snake's rectilinear locomotion (although it looks nothing like our scaly friends). Two separate sets of rotating motorized scales allow the robot to move, and the angle of each set of scales is independently controllable to adapt to different slopes and changes in surface properties. The advantages? Highly adaptable and very efficient movement. Watch:

Watching this video vaguely reminded me of another search and rescue robot from the Tokyo Institute of Technology called Bari-Bari-II, which you should check out here if you haven't seen it before.

It's pretty cool that we've seen robots that can emulate just about all of the different forms of locomotion exhibited by non-robotic snakes: besides the rectilinear locomotion seen here, there are lots of snakebots out there that can do lateral undulation, ones that can climb, and even a few that exhibit a sort of sidewinding. The final type of snake locomotion is called concertina movement, and it's when a snake anchors itself with one part of its body to move another part of its body ahead, and then alternates. Concertina movement is very inefficient, but it works in areas where the snake doesn't have enough room to undulate and it's substantially faster than rectilinear locomotion.

All these different types of locomotion are the reason why we see so many snake robots out there: snakes are powerful, efficient, and above all, versatile. They've had about a hundred million years to figure out how to get around, and as people with pet snakes (like myself) will tell you, we still have a lot to learn from them. 

[ Georgia Tech ]

The Conversation (0)

The Bionic-Hand Arms Race

The prosthetics industry is too focused on high-tech limbs that are complicated, costly, and often impractical

12 min read
A photograph of a young woman with brown eyes and neck length hair dyed rose gold sits at a white table. In one hand she holds a carbon fiber robotic arm and hand. Her other arm ends near her elbow. Her short sleeve shirt has a pattern on it of illustrated hands.

The author, Britt Young, holding her Ottobock bebionic bionic arm.

Gabriela Hasbun. Makeup: Maria Nguyen for MAC cosmetics; Hair: Joan Laqui for Living Proof

In Jules Verne’s 1865 novel From the Earth to the Moon, members of the fictitious Baltimore Gun Club, all disabled Civil War veterans, restlessly search for a new enemy to conquer. They had spent the war innovating new, deadlier weaponry. By the war’s end, with “not quite one arm between four persons, and exactly two legs between six,” these self-taught amputee-weaponsmiths decide to repurpose their skills toward a new projectile: a rocket ship.

The story of the Baltimore Gun Club propelling themselves to the moon is about the extraordinary masculine power of the veteran, who doesn’t simply “overcome” his disability; he derives power and ambition from it. Their “crutches, wooden legs, artificial arms, steel hooks, caoutchouc [rubber] jaws, silver craniums [and] platinum noses” don’t play leading roles in their personalities—they are merely tools on their bodies. These piecemeal men are unlikely crusaders of invention with an even more unlikely mission. And yet who better to design the next great leap in technology than men remade by technology themselves?

Keep Reading ↓Show less