The December 2022 issue of IEEE Spectrum is here!

Close bar

Fusion Is Not Free

Who's paying for ITER's big appetite?

1 min read
Fusion Is Not Free

fusion 1

Who's Buying What? Countries will pay in casings, concrete, and conductors. The European Union must find €600 million in cuts to meet its budget.

fusion2

The world's biggest bet on fusion, the ITER nuclear fusion reactor, may finally be getting over its money troubles. Delegates from ITER's seven international partners agreed in July on a new budget for the construction of the experimental reactor. They estimate that the total costs of the machine and its facilities, slated for completion at Cadarache in southern France by 2019, will tally about 16 billion, or US $21 billion. When the partners signed the original ITER agreement in 2006, they estimated the construction costs—in 2010 currency—at just 5.2 billion (US $6.9 billion). But tweaks to the original reactor design, coupled with rising prices for building materials, have inflated budget projections, inviting some criticism from scientists who say the money could be better spent on nearer-term green-energy R&D. Under the new budget agreement, the European Union will contribute no more than 6.6 billion (US $8.7 billion) to construction costs. Each of the six other member countries will be responsible for delivering about 1.5 billion worth of hardware—conductors, coils, shields, power supplies—instead of cash. Now that ITER's budget issues are settled, construction crews can start putting pickaxes in dirt.

Keep Reading ↓Show less

This article is for IEEE members only. Join IEEE to access our full archive.

Join the world’s largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to all of Spectrum’s articles, podcasts, and special reports. Learn more →

If you're already an IEEE member, please sign in to continue reading.

Membership includes:

  • Get unlimited access to IEEE Spectrum content
  • Follow your favorite topics to create a personalized feed of IEEE Spectrum content
  • Save Spectrum articles to read later
  • Network with other technology professionals
  • Establish a professional profile
  • Create a group to share and collaborate on projects
  • Discover IEEE events and activities
  • Join and participate in discussions
This photograph shows a car with the words “We Drive Solar” on the door, connected to a charging station. A windmill can be seen in the background.

The Dutch city of Utrecht is embracing vehicle-to-grid technology, an example of which is shown here—an EV connected to a bidirectional charger. The historic Rijn en Zon windmill provides a fitting background for this scene.

We Drive Solar

Hundreds of charging stations for electric vehicles dot Utrecht’s urban landscape in the Netherlands like little electric mushrooms. Unlike those you may have grown accustomed to seeing, many of these stations don’t just charge electric cars—they can also send power from vehicle batteries to the local utility grid for use by homes and businesses.

Debates over the feasibility and value of such vehicle-to-grid technology go back decades. Those arguments are not yet settled. But big automakers like Volkswagen, Nissan, and Hyundai have moved to produce the kinds of cars that can use such bidirectional chargers—alongside similar vehicle-to-home technology, whereby your car can power your house, say, during a blackout, as promoted by Ford with its new F-150 Lightning. Given the rapid uptake of electric vehicles, many people are thinking hard about how to make the best use of all that rolling battery power.

Keep Reading ↓Show less