Fiber Optic Cables Could Shake Up Our Understanding of Deep-Sea Quakes

Tiny perturbations in signal polarizations can hint at underwater seismic events

3 min read
The Curie cable lands in Valparaiso, Chile in 2019.
The Curie cable lands in Valparaiso, Chile in 2019. Researchers hope the cable, and other undersea cables like it, could be used to detect earthquakes on the ocean floor.
GOOGLE

There’s a lot we don’t know about the ocean floor, thanks to crushing pressures and perpetual darkness. But there are still repercussions from what happens down there. Deep sea earthquakes, for example, can result in devastating tsunamis. So it would be nice to keep an eye on the ocean floor.

Fortunately, despite the remote and punishing environment, we already have a plethora of potential eyes on the bottom of the sea. There are around 400 fiber optic cables spanning the oceans. These cables are already the backbone of the global Internet—what if they could be the backbone of deep-sea monitoring and research efforts as well?

That’s precisely what a group of researchers from the California Institute of Technology, Google, and the University of L’Aquila in Italy have been working on. In a paper published in Optica, the group outlines a technique for using perturbations in the polarization of signals traveling through the fiber to detect undersea earthquakes and sea waves, like tsunamis.

“Most of the cables are four kilometers down in the ocean, and you cannot go down and see what’s going on down there,” says Antonio Mecozzi, a professor of physics at the University of L’Aquila and one of the paper’s co-authors. The researchers used Google’s Curie cable, which connects Los Angeles with Valparaiso, Chile.

“Only strong perturbations by earthquakes are able to affect the polarization in a way we can measure.”

The first thing the researchers discovered is that the Curie cable’s baseline level of polarization perturbations is remarkably stable. In other words, as the optical signals travel along the length of the cable, the polarization of those signals does not change much due to the cable itself. “The fact that the transmission system is so stable, it’s the reason why we could use it to measure [other vibrations],” says Mecozzi. “Only strong perturbations by earthquakes are able to affect the polarization in a way we can measure.”

The researchers found that by taking data readily available from the receivers at the ends of the Curie cable, they could hunt for the deviations from baseline levels that hinted at an earthquake or powerful underwater waves.

The technique still requires some development to make it more sensitive. As it is, Mecozzi says that if the cable had not had a stable baseline, the group likely would not have been able to pick out any further changes in polarization caused by quakes.

There’s also some needed refinement in how to detect different types of earthquakes. The researchers realized that quakes sometimes didn’t leave telltale perturbations. Curiously, whether or not an earthquake appeared in the receiver data was independent of the quake’s magnitude. The researchers aren’t sure exactly why some quakes showed up and some didn’t, but they have theories.

“Earthquakes have a complicated rupture process that occurs in the earth,” says Jorge Castellanos, a graduate student in geophysics at the California Institute of Technology and another co-author on the paper. “And earthquakes radiate all sorts of waves, they don’t just radiate one type of wave.” Whether or not an earthquake registered via polarization perturbations, Castellanos thinks, might depend on what types of seismic waves reached the cable, and from which direction.

It’s also currently not possible to localize an earthquake along the cable using the method. For a short, regional cable, that might not be a huge issue, but the Curie cable is over 10,000 kilometers long. Knowing that an earthquake happened in the vicinity of the cable somewhere along that length is admittedly not very helpful information by itself.

However, the researchers know they are currently limited in their understanding of the detection technique because they’ve only tested it on the one cable. They hope that similar analyses of data from other cables will give them a better idea of how general their findings are, or if the Curie cable is a fortunate anomaly.

And ultimately, using multiple cables could help solve the localization problem that emerges from using just one cable. By analyzing the data from multiple cables traversing the same general area of the ocean floor, and seeing which cables were affected by perturbations, monitoring systems could develop a better idea of where a quake happened.

Castellanos says that the technique doesn’t have to be limited to detecting undersea earthquakes or underwater waves that might develop into dangerous tsunamis. It is, again, really difficult to monitor the ocean floor in any capacity. As the perturbation technique becomes more refined, he speculates that things like deep ocean temperatures could be monitored, based on differences in how deep-sea waves affect the cable’s polarization over time. That could be useful for studying how climate change is affecting, or being affected by, deep ocean systems. Given time, the information gained from these slight changes in cable signal polarizations could create a sea change in our understanding of the deep ocean.

The Conversation (0)

How the FCC Settles Radio-Spectrum Turf Wars

Remember the 5G-airport controversy? Here’s how such disputes play out

11 min read
This photo shows a man in the basket of a cherry picker working on an antenna as an airliner passes overhead.

The airline and cellular-phone industries have been at loggerheads over the possibility that 5G transmissions from antennas such as this one, located at Los Angeles International Airport, could interfere with the radar altimeters used in aircraft.

Patrick T. Fallon/AFP/Getty Images
Blue

You’ve no doubt seen the scary headlines: Will 5G Cause Planes to Crash? They appeared late last year, after the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration warned that new 5G services from AT&T and Verizon might interfere with the radar altimeters that airplane pilots rely on to land safely. Not true, said AT&T and Verizon, with the backing of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, which had authorized 5G. The altimeters are safe, they maintained. Air travelers didn’t know what to believe.

Another recent FCC decision had also created a controversy about public safety: okaying Wi-Fi devices in a 6-gigahertz frequency band long used by point-to-point microwave systems to carry safety-critical data. The microwave operators predicted that the Wi-Fi devices would disrupt their systems; the Wi-Fi interests insisted they would not. (As an attorney, I represented a microwave-industry group in the ensuing legal dispute.)

Keep Reading ↓Show less
{"imageShortcodeIds":["29845282"]}