Satellites Spot Carbon Pollution From Oil and Gas Wells

Methane-tracking satellites named Claire and Iris pressure oil and gas producers to act

4 min read
An image of GHGSat's methane-tracking microsatellite.
Iris is an upgraded methane-tracking microsatellite built by the company GHGSat, and is scheduled to launch in early 2020.
Photo: GHGSat

Berkeley, California banned the installation of natural gas pipes to new residential construction projects last month. The city is committed to slashing its carbon footprint, and natural gas is a carbon double-whammy: when burned, it releases carbon dioxide and, when leaked, its main ingredient, methane, is a far more potent greenhouse gas than CO2.

Several dozen California cities appear set to follow Berkeley's lead. Which helps explain why the U.S. government’s plan to scrap mandatory monitoring for methane leaks is getting few cheers from the oil and gas industry. Paying attention to gas leaks is critical to defending their product's social license.

Those leaks, meanwhile, may soon have nowhere to hide thanks to a growing wave of private, methane-detecting satellites being placed in orbit. Canada's GHGSat led the charge in 2016 with its carbon-tracking Claire microsatellite, and the company now has a second-generation microsat ready to launch. Several more methane-detecting satellites are coming, including one from the Environmental Defense Fund. If gas producers don't find and squelch their own pollution, this proliferation of remote observers will make it increasingly likely that others will shine a spotlight on it.

Methane molecules trap heat more than 80 times more effectively than CO2 during their first two decades in Earth’s atmosphere. Today, there are 2.5-times more methane molecules up there than there were prior to the Industrial Revolution. In all, rising methane emissions contribute about one-fifth of the thickening radiation blanket that has already warmed the world by nearly 1 degree C since 1850.

The extra methane comes from a wide range of sources, including wetlands, cattle, landfills, and all segments of the natural gas supply chain. The latter is under particular scrutiny thanks to recent research coordinated by EDF showing that U.S. oil and gas operations leak about 60 percent more methane than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency had estimated. Fixing those leaks will be on the agenda next week as global leaders gather in New York for the United Nations Climate Action Summit. Their task is to accelerate action toward climate change mitigation goals agreed to in Paris in 2015: limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius or, at most, 2.0 degrees this century.

This image produced by the satellite Claire shows a methane plume rising from an oil and gas facility in Texas. This image produced by the satellite Claire shows a methane plume rising from an oil and gas facility. Photo: GHGSat

Stéphane Germain, GHGSat’s president, says his firm built its second satellite—named Iris—to meet demand from clients. While Claire proved out GHGSat's equipment and analytical methods for carbon pollution tracking, Germain says Iris will provide better resolution, precision, and throughput required to expand the business.

The technology improvements on Iris are a mix of lessons learned from Claire and some original engineering. Tweaks to Claire’s spectrometer and optics will make Iris more sensitive. In order to measure small emissions sources with Claire, GHGSat must combine at least 10 or so images of a site, sometimes from multiple flyovers, to get a statistically significant reading of methane emissions. “Whereas it might have taken us 20 measurements to see smaller plumes with Claire, we should be able to see those plumes with a single pass with Iris,” says Germain.

Much of the boost comes from better optics that reduce stray light and internal reflections. Some improvements are possible thanks to a tighter spectral detection range. Whereas Claire was designed to detect both CO2 and methane, Iris’s spectrometer will only see the telltale light absorption patterns for methane.

“Whereas it might have taken us 20 measurements to see a plume with Claire, we should be able to see that plume with a single pass with Iris.”

Trading breadth for performance makes business sense because market intelligence firms already provide good estimates of CO2 pollution from industrial facilities. (Pollution provides competitors with a proxy for each others' production.) In contrast, the presence of methane leaks is something that oil and gas operators—with thousands of wells, processing stations and pipelines—are still trying to learn about in their own operations. They need good data, says Germain, to focus leak prevention investments where they will pay off fastest through increased gas delivery and, where applicable, avoided carbon taxes.

GHGSat has also squeezed a potentially game-changing system onto Iris’s microwave-sized platform: an optical communications downlink, which is virtually nonexistent on large commercial satellites and will be a first for a microsat. If the experimental 1-gigabit-per-second laser-based transmission works, it will replace Iris's 2-megabit-per-second radio and smash GHGSat's greatest operational bottleneck. “We could have a thousand-fold increase in downlink capacity, which would allow us to take many, many more observations per satellite,” says Germain.

Most satellites stick to radio transmission because of the precision required to safely beam powerful lasers down at Earth. Iris’s optical downlink, called Darkstar-Q8, uses steerable MEMS mirrors guided by a star tracker from Toronto-based Sinclair Interplanetary to lock the laser signal on to GHGSat’s ground stations. Data processing happens on the latest industrial-grade processor from Montreal-based Xiphos Technologies, the Q8, which Iris will help certify for spaceflight.

The only question is—when? Iris’s scheduled launch this month was pushed back to early 2020 after satellite launch leader Arianespace suffered the first failure of its Vega rocket in July. GHGSat’s planned 2020 launch of its third satellite, already in development, may also be pushed back.

GHGSat's launch delays may be a source of stress at the firm as additional commercial players circle its market. One, Palo Alto-based startup Bluefield Technologies, vows to launch its first methane-detecting satellite next year. Many more firms are developing ground- and drone-based methane sensing, which EDF and Stanford University highlighted last week with the publication of results from a multi-year mobile monitoring challenge.

Germain says the EDF-led satellite project—MethaneSAT—should be complimentary to GHGSat’s. Iris will take 12 kilometer-by-12 km snapshots with 25 meter-by-25 m pixels, offering pinpoint detection over a relatively narrow field of view. MethaneSAT, in contrast, will shoot a 200 km-by-200 km picture with great precision but comparatively coarse 1-square-km pixels. If they both work as promised, methane hotspots identified by MethaneSAT can be traced to specific sites by Claire, Iris, and their successors.

Editor’s note: This story is published in cooperation with more than 250 media organizations and independent journalists that have focused their coverage on climate change ahead of the UN Climate Action Summit. IEEE Spectrum’s participation in the Covering Climate Now partnership builds on our past reporting about this global issue. 

The Conversation (0)

Smokey the AI

Smart image analysis algorithms, fed by cameras carried by drones and ground vehicles, can help power companies prevent forest fires

7 min read
Smokey the AI

The 2021 Dixie Fire in northern California is suspected of being caused by Pacific Gas & Electric's equipment. The fire is the second-largest in California history.

Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images

The 2020 fire season in the United States was the worst in at least 70 years, with some 4 million hectares burned on the west coast alone. These West Coast fires killed at least 37 people, destroyed hundreds of structures, caused nearly US $20 billion in damage, and filled the air with smoke that threatened the health of millions of people. And this was on top of a 2018 fire season that burned more than 700,000 hectares of land in California, and a 2019-to-2020 wildfire season in Australia that torched nearly 18 million hectares.

While some of these fires started from human carelessness—or arson—far too many were sparked and spread by the electrical power infrastructure and power lines. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) calculates that nearly 100,000 burned hectares of those 2018 California fires were the fault of the electric power infrastructure, including the devastating Camp Fire, which wiped out most of the town of Paradise. And in July of this year, Pacific Gas & Electric indicated that blown fuses on one of its utility poles may have sparked the Dixie Fire, which burned nearly 400,000 hectares.

Until these recent disasters, most people, even those living in vulnerable areas, didn't give much thought to the fire risk from the electrical infrastructure. Power companies trim trees and inspect lines on a regular—if not particularly frequent—basis.

However, the frequency of these inspections has changed little over the years, even though climate change is causing drier and hotter weather conditions that lead up to more intense wildfires. In addition, many key electrical components are beyond their shelf lives, including insulators, transformers, arrestors, and splices that are more than 40 years old. Many transmission towers, most built for a 40-year lifespan, are entering their final decade.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less