Could Energy Costs Doom Aereo’s TV Streaming Service?

It’s not just set-top boxes that are power hogs

2 min read
Could Energy Costs Doom Aereo’s TV Streaming Service?
Photo: Bebeto Matthews/AP Photo

Back before Netflix, Hulu, or even cable television, we all relied on antennas to capture video signals. What's old is new again with Aereo, a TV streaming service that takes the concept of rabbit ears into the 21st century.  

Most of the news about the start-up has centered on its legal battles with incumbent broadcast networks, but according to a report in the Wall St. Journal, it's the company’s hardware that could pose the biggest challenge as it tries to grow.

When you sign up for Aereo, you are assigned a tiny remote antenna and DVR that can record live broadcasts and play them back as streaming video. If you want to record Parks and Recreation on NBC, for instance, that miniature antenna tunes into the right frequency for your location. Even if other people record the same show, the recording for each customer is unique. The signal goes to Aereo’s transcoding equipment that converts the signal to one that can be sent over the Internet. 

The problem is that each antenna uses about five to six watts of power. That’s less than many set-top boxes consume, but the difference is in who pays the energy bill. With cable, the customer, not the cable company, pays for the power consumption of the set-top box. The Wall St. Journal noted that if Aereo were to scale its New York subscription base to about 350 000 customers, the energy cost would be roughly US $2 million per year. New York, which has relatively high energy prices for the United States, is also not its only market. Chet Kanojia, CEO of Aereo, told the Wall St. Journal he hoped to be in nearly 20 markets by the end of the year. 

The company is busy looking into solutions, like integrated hardware designs with lower energy needs and going off of the grid with fuel cells. Aereo is not alone in trying to slash power consumption to deliver its service. Other sectors that enable our digital and mobile lifestyles, including data centers and telecoms, are also looking at low-power designs to cut costs.

If distributed generation or technological fixes do not pan out, another solution would be to raise the subscription price from its current $8 per month. But raising the price for access to traditional broadcast TV might be a hard sell against other streaming services like Hulu or Netflix, the latter of which took home an Emmy Award this year for its show House of Cards.

Kanojia spoke with IEEE Spectrum earlier this year, and he said he relishes the challenges, technical and otherwise, that his company faces.

“It’s really an incredible experience to be able to be part of something this interesting,” he said at the time, “because it’s got fascinating technology that spans from RF to compression technologies to hardware systems that we build ourselves to massive storage systems, playback equipment, consumer experiences, not to mention legal and policy stuff that goes around our business.”

Photo: Bebeto Matthews/AP Photo

The Conversation (0)

How the FCC Settles Radio-Spectrum Turf Wars

Remember the 5G-airport controversy? Here’s how such disputes play out

11 min read
This photo shows a man in the basket of a cherry picker working on an antenna as an airliner passes overhead.

The airline and cellular-phone industries have been at loggerheads over the possibility that 5G transmissions from antennas such as this one, located at Los Angeles International Airport, could interfere with the radar altimeters used in aircraft.

Patrick T. Fallon/AFP/Getty Images

You’ve no doubt seen the scary headlines: Will 5G Cause Planes to Crash? They appeared late last year, after the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration warned that new 5G services from AT&T and Verizon might interfere with the radar altimeters that airplane pilots rely on to land safely. Not true, said AT&T and Verizon, with the backing of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, which had authorized 5G. The altimeters are safe, they maintained. Air travelers didn’t know what to believe.

Another recent FCC decision had also created a controversy about public safety: okaying Wi-Fi devices in a 6-gigahertz frequency band long used by point-to-point microwave systems to carry safety-critical data. The microwave operators predicted that the Wi-Fi devices would disrupt their systems; the Wi-Fi interests insisted they would not. (As an attorney, I represented a microwave-industry group in the ensuing legal dispute.)

Keep Reading ↓Show less