EC Sees Heavy Pricetag to UK Nukes Plan

European Commission competition czars say planned UK price supports for new nuclear generation could unnecessarily cost taxpayers £17 billion

2 min read
EC Sees Heavy Pricetag to UK Nukes Plan
Photo: EDF Energy

Government incentives for a pair of proposed nuclear reactors could cost U.K. taxpayers as much as £17.62 billion, thus exceeding the reactors' projected cost. The EC figure is a preliminary estimate included in an initial report to London published on Friday by European Commission competition czars. The letter notifies the British government that—as we predicted in December—Brussels is launching a formal investigation to assess whether the subsidies violate European state aid rules. 

The preliminary findings suggest that the U.K. and E.C. are on a collision source. As the Financial Times summed it up this weekend: "The severity of [the EC's] initial concerns will cast a shadow over government hopes to win approval for the deal."

The pair of reactors concerned are French-designed 1600-megawatt EPR reactors that Paris-based Électricité de France (EDF) wants to build at the Hinkley Point nuclear power station on England’s southwest coast. In October, the government of British prime minister David Cameron (pictured above at one of Hinkley Point's existing 1970s-era reactors) guaranteed EDF approximately £92.50 ($151) for every megawatt-hour generated at Hinkley Point. That price is nearly double the average amount paid to U.K. generators last year.

EDF insists that without the so-called contract-for-difference guarantee, U.K. power prices, as well as carbon credits that the plant would earn, are too low and uncertain to justify the £16 billion investment. And the U.K. government argues that it needs up to 16 000 MW of new nuclear to meet ambitious greenhouse-gas reduction goals that call for a near decarbonization of the electricity system by 2030. 

However, European limits on state aid forbid aid to new nuclear generation. The UK tried to add an exemption for nuclear generation during a recent rewrite of the state aid rules, but its motion failed. Hence its insistence in public statements that the price guarantee, as well as government backing for the plant's financing, do not represent subsidies. As Secretary of State for Energy Edward Davey insisted when the deal was announced in October: "For the first time, a nuclear station in this country will not have been built with money from the British taxpayer."

The EC doesn't seem to be buying that. As Commission Vice-President and competition chief Joaquín Almunia described the initial findings: "The nuclear plant operator will ultimately receive a fixed level of revenues and will therefore not be exposed to market risks...It would appear to be difficult for the UK to provide a greater degree of certainty." [emphasis added]

The EC also questions whether there is a "market failure" that requires correction. It suggests that the subsidies might therefore be unnecessary and/or that they will freeze out competitors, including developers of renewable resources such as offshore wind power. 

The Conversation (0)

How to Prevent Blackouts by Packetizing the Power Grid

The rules of the Internet can also balance electricity supply and demand

13 min read
Vertical
How to Prevent Blackouts by Packetizing the Power Grid
Dan Page
DarkBlue1

Bad things happen when demand outstrips supply. We learned that lesson too well at the start of the pandemic, when demand for toilet paper, disinfecting wipes, masks, and ventilators outstripped the available supply. Today, chip shortages continue to disrupt the consumer electronics, automobile, and other sectors. Clearly, balancing the supply and demand of goods is critical for a stable, normal, functional society.

That need for balance is true of electric power grids, too. We got a heartrending reminder of this fact in February 2021, when Texas experienced an unprecedented and deadly winter freeze. Spiking demand for electric heat collided with supply problems created by frozen natural-gas equipment and below-average wind-power production. The resulting imbalance left more than 2 million households without power for days, caused at least 210 deaths, and led to economic losses of up to US $130 billion.

Keep Reading ↓ Show less
{"imageShortcodeIds":[]}